- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Non-Official Battlefield 2042 Thread - I have retired as this thread's keeper...
Posted on 10/8/21 at 9:17 am to finchmeister08
Posted on 10/8/21 at 9:17 am to finchmeister08
Lol. All the presets were High so maybe I’ll tinker with the settings to try and play at 1440p 144Hz.
1
Posted on 10/8/21 at 9:18 am to southpawcock
Also I had no idea this map was based on a real place. Pretty neat actually.. I do like they are actually using Russia and their flag and real life stuff instead of fake armies to avoid controversy.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 11:44 am to southpawcock
But no China, can’t upset them. I still think the specialist thing is dumb af and if it’s a must that we have them, just make them apart of the class system that is missing. And bring back team uniforms!
Look how beautiful this was:
This is trash:
Look how beautiful this was:
This is trash:
Posted on 10/8/21 at 11:48 am to hg
That's just so lazy..
Posted on 10/8/21 at 12:10 pm to hg
Posted on 10/8/21 at 12:13 pm to hg
You get me.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 12:15 pm to sicboy
quote:
Actual strategy and not twitch shooting?
Battlefield takes the least amount of strategy of any shooter. You and your squad barely have any impact on the results. Which is fine, that is what BF is, large combat. But to act like it's a game that takes strategy is funny. And yes, players that are not as "twitchy" will like it more because you are bound to shoot somebody in the back at some point.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 12:18 pm to Mystery
battlefield has always played as if it was lock at 30 fps even though it wasn't. the overall movement didn't feel as smooth as to me like CoD does. it's hard to explain.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 12:20 pm to finchmeister08
quote:
it's hard to explain.
It’s just a different build/engine. Has always been that way. 3 was the smoothest the game ever felt.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 12:21 pm to finchmeister08
I just get bored with BF after a few days/weeks. It is a fun game to me but I do not like large scale battles. I want my play to actually matter. Getting wins or losses in those games mean next to nothing to me.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 12:35 pm to Mystery
I think I’m vibing with you on that…I don’t need 128 players. I don’t need all that chaos. Give 10 v 10 or even some 6 v 6 in a game that makes the gun the focus.
This post was edited on 10/8/21 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 10/8/21 at 12:59 pm to The Sad Banana
Jesus we get it you hate battlefield for years now. Good grief dude take it somewhere else.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 1:00 pm to finchmeister08
You're just used to arcade style from CoD. Battlefield feels wayyyyy better always.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 1:12 pm to The Sad Banana
Rush game mode is what I first remember about BF and what made it for me. Just playing Rush on BF3 and taking over the objective and then BASE jumping down to the next one was an awesome gaming experience. Not sure where or why Conquest became their go-to. I mean yea when there’s that many players on a map trying to hold a spot it does feel like me or my team have little impact on helping do that. Also the controls at times especially the vehicles seem overly complicated.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 1:16 pm to hg
Yeah. I like BF3 on console because it was what, 12 v 12? That Damavand Peak BASE jump was so damn cool. But what may keep me into this is being able to do it again with Portal.
I’m not a fan of the BF2042 base game.
I’m not a fan of the BF2042 base game.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 1:18 pm to hg
I grew up on Rush too at least the early days then switched to conquest when they stopped caring about rush.
I love this hold T to swap attachments on the fly though. Feel like other games will be copying it soon.
I love this hold T to swap attachments on the fly though. Feel like other games will be copying it soon.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 1:18 pm to The Sad Banana
quote:
I don’t need all that chaos
Battlefield has always been chaos. Destruction, tanks, jets, hawks......I mean...
quote:
I don’t need 128 players.
Again...this is battlefield....I’m not sure what you are expecting..
quote:
Give 10 v 10 or even some 6 v 6 in a game that makes the gun the focus.
I wouldn’t get your hopes up ever in regards to BF making this type of gameplay a priority.
You don’t have bullet drop or recoil in BF for it to throw you into a 20ft x 20ft box to duke it out.
This post was edited on 10/8/21 at 1:20 pm
Posted on 10/8/21 at 1:21 pm to Blitzed
Ya that's what is irritating me. This is battlefield not cod.
Even rush on BF3 was 32v32.
Even rush on BF3 was 32v32.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 1:29 pm to UltimateHog
BF3 actually had the CQ combat DLC and it was fun. But again I don’t play BF for that type of play.
This post was edited on 10/8/21 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 10/8/21 at 1:31 pm to Blitzed
Yep, personally glad they got away from the CQC even for add ons. 32v32 rush is as small as I want to go.
Be like queueing up for team deathmatch or something.
Be like queueing up for team deathmatch or something.
Page 21 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News