- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Harry Potter Video Game to Have Trans-Inclusive Character Creation
Posted on 3/8/21 at 4:57 pm to sicboy
Posted on 3/8/21 at 4:57 pm to sicboy
quote:
The only reason this is news is because Rowling had been on the war path against trans.
Has she? Or did she simply support a lady who was fired for stating there were two sexes?
Posted on 3/8/21 at 6:03 pm to St Augustine
quote:
Has she? Or did she simply support a lady who was fired for stating there were two sexes?
No. There was more than that. Look it up.
Posted on 3/8/21 at 6:19 pm to sicboy
quote:
Look it up.
I’ll take your word for it. Good for JK.
Posted on 3/8/21 at 6:29 pm to St Augustine
You can disagree with something and not be a prick about it.
Posted on 3/9/21 at 10:43 am to sicboy
quote:
Everybody, meet bruce.

Posted on 3/9/21 at 1:27 pm to sicboy
quote:
No. There was more than that.
No, there wasn't. She just views sex as mattering more than gender identity, and Letter People lost their goddamn minds that she dare speak her mind and not kneel before them in supplication.
This post was edited on 3/9/21 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 3/9/21 at 1:46 pm to sicboy
quote:"I'm going to make a vague claim, but it's on you to find the proof."
No. There was more than that. Look it up.

Posted on 3/9/21 at 2:16 pm to Drewbie
Not my fault he hasn't been paying attention. He can do his own work.
Google ”rowling" and "trans". Not that hard.
Google ”rowling" and "trans". Not that hard.
Posted on 3/9/21 at 2:38 pm to sicboy
quote:Yeah, that's not how the burden of proof is distributed.
Not my fault he hasn't been paying attention. He can do his own work.
Also, you can google just about anything with the right keywords and find what you want to find, reputable or not. That's why "just google it" stopped being a good argument in about 6th grade.
This post was edited on 3/9/21 at 2:42 pm
Posted on 3/9/21 at 3:35 pm to sicboy
quote:
Rowling had been on the war path against trans.
“War path”
Posted on 3/9/21 at 3:40 pm to theducks
The appropriate response to this thread is somewhere between “okay cool” and not clicking on it at all.
Posted on 3/9/21 at 6:24 pm to Drewbie
quote:
Also, you can google just about anything with the right keywords and find what you want to find, reputable or not. That's why "just google it" stopped being a good argument in about 6th grade.
If you Google "does Rowling hate trans", sure. I didn't tell you to do that.
Posted on 3/10/21 at 8:41 am to sicboy
For the record, your search suggestion brings up nothing but beat writers and blog posts full of speculation and opinion pieces. Nothing anywhere near actual news or legitimate reporting. Two of the top 3 sites listed were glamour.com and slate.com
As usual, the slightest bit of research brings the ridiculousness of cancel culture to light.

quote:What a war path. How dare she not be ok with biological women being reduced to "people who menstruate".
After reading an article that referred to “people who menstruate,” instead of “women,” Rowling took to Twitter: “?‘People who menstruate.’ I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?” She added: “If sex isn’t real, the lived reality of women globally is erased.?.?. . I do not believe it’s hateful to say so.”
In a follow-up essay, Rowling elaborated. “?‘Woman’ is not a costume. ‘Woman’ is not an idea in a man’s head.?.?. . The ‘inclusive’ language that calls female people ‘menstruators’ and ‘people with vulvas’ strikes many women as dehumanizing.” Brava.

As usual, the slightest bit of research brings the ridiculousness of cancel culture to light.
This post was edited on 3/10/21 at 9:32 am
Posted on 3/10/21 at 12:41 pm to Drewbie
You guys debating the opinion of some old rich British woman's opinion on men who want to cut their dick off and wear mini-skirts is just a whole new level of gaming board sadness.
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:17 pm to Will Cover
Y'all are such snowflakes
Posted on 3/10/21 at 10:42 pm to Will Cover
quote:
gender placement for the school dormitories
If there is no such thing as gender, then why does this matter? Should just be "dormitories", right?
Posted on 3/15/21 at 12:06 pm to Will Cover
whew, I wasn't gonna buy it unless I could make a pre-pubescent child wear a dress that covers her dick. Glad that's settled.
Popular
Back to top
