- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What temp do you NEED to get crawfish up to?
Posted on 4/1/22 at 12:33 pm to Irregardless
Posted on 4/1/22 at 12:33 pm to Irregardless
I use a maverick thermaprobe on every crawfish in the pot. Yes it takes a little more prep work but I suffer for my batch.
This post was edited on 4/1/22 at 12:34 pm
Posted on 4/1/22 at 12:40 pm to Tiger Ryno
quote:
I use a maverick thermaprobe on every crawfish in the pot. Yes it takes a little more prep work but I suffer for my batch.
Posted on 4/1/22 at 1:31 pm to Tiger Ryno
Probe each one up the tail?
Posted on 4/1/22 at 1:58 pm to Irregardless
Yeah I rarely bring it up to a full rolling boil. Once I see steam and small bubbles/foam forming let it go for a few minutes or so and cut the heat. I let them soak for at least 30 minutes though.
Posted on 4/1/22 at 2:06 pm to bigberg2000
A lot of flack here OP, but the reality is "boiling" shrimp and crawfish is completely unnecessary and furthermore poor cooking.
I sous vide shrimp now at home when I'm doing under 3 lbs. It works awesome. Set it at 145* and you can cook them for 1-2 hours and serve them hot as soon as you are ready to eat. Also works great for cocktail shrimp.
Crawfish or a low country boil is different, but there's 0 reason to get your water back up to a "boil". It allows you to be able to soak them longer, use less seasoning, and not overcook them.
I sous vide shrimp now at home when I'm doing under 3 lbs. It works awesome. Set it at 145* and you can cook them for 1-2 hours and serve them hot as soon as you are ready to eat. Also works great for cocktail shrimp.
Crawfish or a low country boil is different, but there's 0 reason to get your water back up to a "boil". It allows you to be able to soak them longer, use less seasoning, and not overcook them.
Posted on 4/1/22 at 2:19 pm to baldona
quote:
and furthermore poor cooking.
Posted on 4/1/22 at 5:50 pm to Gaston
All the God only knows what is in there with them needs to get to 165 + for 10 seconds. If they are getting boiled it should get that at least . Got to remember what they live in. If it was just the meat one was cooking it would be a different story ( as far as food safety)
Posted on 4/1/22 at 8:23 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
LNCHBOX
Explain why overcooking food is a good idea? Routinely overcooking shrimp and crawfish is like a gulf coast past time. I’m not trying to be cocky, I’m just saying the whole idea of a ‘boil’ is a horrible misnomer.
I fry in 350* oil that doesn’t mean it has to be at 350* to cook. You don’t need the water to be anywhere close to 212* to cook the seafood.
There’s absolutely nothing wrong with just heating the water to 165* and cooking for longer and never cutting the heat. For one, it would save you a lot of time getting the water up to temp.
This post was edited on 4/1/22 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 4/2/22 at 9:21 am to LSUFanHouston
quote:
Once you get the pot to a roiling boil, a minute or two at most is all you need before shutting off to begin soak.
Depends on size and color.
At the beginning of the season when they are light and small, I usually do 2 minute rolling boil/25 minute soak. Towards the end of the season when most crawfish are dark and big, I’ll let it roll for about five minutes and do about a 20 minute soak.
Posted on 4/2/22 at 10:07 am to Antonio Moss
I’ll bet you usually have a lot of crawfish left over to peel.
Posted on 4/2/22 at 10:17 am to baldona
For a few years now there’s been a small but growing movement here to call attention to the many wrong, or at least unnecessary, things done in many crawfish boil processes, usually out of nothing but pure routine or tradition. We’ve done a good job of destroying the salt bath, “purging” myth. Now working on the rolling boil fallacy. Some have open minds and will comprehend and adapt and their efforts and end result will be better for it.
Posted on 4/2/22 at 2:41 pm to baldona
quote:
Routinely overcooking shrimp and crawfish is like a gulf coast past time
quote:
I’m not trying to be cocky
Posted on 4/2/22 at 2:54 pm to Gaston
Rolling boil, dump crawfish in, once they float and you see some foam or bubbles building cut it off. I Do not get back to a boil. Never had them undercooked. I do soak for approx 20-30 min as well
Posted on 4/2/22 at 4:41 pm to Gaston
frick y’all for the downvotes.
Posted on 4/2/22 at 5:41 pm to Epic Cajun
Once the crawfish float to the top they are cooked. No need to get it to a rolling boil.
Also if you cool the pot down to ~150-160 you’ll never have to fear overcooking and can soak them
For an hour if you want.
Also if you cool the pot down to ~150-160 you’ll never have to fear overcooking and can soak them
For an hour if you want.
Popular
Back to top

2






