Started By
Message

re: What temp do you NEED to get crawfish up to?

Posted on 4/1/22 at 12:33 pm to
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
108705 posts
Posted on 4/1/22 at 12:33 pm to
I use a maverick thermaprobe on every crawfish in the pot. Yes it takes a little more prep work but I suffer for my batch.
This post was edited on 4/1/22 at 12:34 pm
Posted by Irregardless
Member since Nov 2021
2239 posts
Posted on 4/1/22 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

I use a maverick thermaprobe on every crawfish in the pot. Yes it takes a little more prep work but I suffer for my batch.


Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29822 posts
Posted on 4/1/22 at 1:31 pm to
Probe each one up the tail?
Posted by bigberg2000
houston, from chalmette
Member since Sep 2005
70807 posts
Posted on 4/1/22 at 1:58 pm to
Yeah I rarely bring it up to a full rolling boil. Once I see steam and small bubbles/foam forming let it go for a few minutes or so and cut the heat. I let them soak for at least 30 minutes though.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24439 posts
Posted on 4/1/22 at 2:06 pm to
A lot of flack here OP, but the reality is "boiling" shrimp and crawfish is completely unnecessary and furthermore poor cooking.

I sous vide shrimp now at home when I'm doing under 3 lbs. It works awesome. Set it at 145* and you can cook them for 1-2 hours and serve them hot as soon as you are ready to eat. Also works great for cocktail shrimp.

Crawfish or a low country boil is different, but there's 0 reason to get your water back up to a "boil". It allows you to be able to soak them longer, use less seasoning, and not overcook them.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89339 posts
Posted on 4/1/22 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

and furthermore poor cooking.
Posted by nwacajun
St louis
Member since Dec 2008
1660 posts
Posted on 4/1/22 at 5:50 pm to
All the God only knows what is in there with them needs to get to 165 + for 10 seconds. If they are getting boiled it should get that at least . Got to remember what they live in. If it was just the meat one was cooking it would be a different story ( as far as food safety)
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24439 posts
Posted on 4/1/22 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

LNCHBOX


Explain why overcooking food is a good idea? Routinely overcooking shrimp and crawfish is like a gulf coast past time. I’m not trying to be cocky, I’m just saying the whole idea of a ‘boil’ is a horrible misnomer.

I fry in 350* oil that doesn’t mean it has to be at 350* to cook. You don’t need the water to be anywhere close to 212* to cook the seafood.

There’s absolutely nothing wrong with just heating the water to 165* and cooking for longer and never cutting the heat. For one, it would save you a lot of time getting the water up to temp.
This post was edited on 4/1/22 at 8:23 pm
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49573 posts
Posted on 4/2/22 at 9:21 am to
quote:

Once you get the pot to a roiling boil, a minute or two at most is all you need before shutting off to begin soak.



Depends on size and color.

At the beginning of the season when they are light and small, I usually do 2 minute rolling boil/25 minute soak. Towards the end of the season when most crawfish are dark and big, I’ll let it roll for about five minutes and do about a 20 minute soak.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
39538 posts
Posted on 4/2/22 at 10:07 am to
I’ll bet you usually have a lot of crawfish left over to peel.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
39538 posts
Posted on 4/2/22 at 10:17 am to
For a few years now there’s been a small but growing movement here to call attention to the many wrong, or at least unnecessary, things done in many crawfish boil processes, usually out of nothing but pure routine or tradition. We’ve done a good job of destroying the salt bath, “purging” myth. Now working on the rolling boil fallacy. Some have open minds and will comprehend and adapt and their efforts and end result will be better for it.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49573 posts
Posted on 4/2/22 at 10:27 am to
Nope
Posted by SOLA
There
Member since Mar 2014
3821 posts
Posted on 4/2/22 at 1:57 pm to
They are ok when they float
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89339 posts
Posted on 4/2/22 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

Routinely overcooking shrimp and crawfish is like a gulf coast past time
quote:

I’m not trying to be cocky
You can't come in here saying the standard method is "poor cooking" and not expect to catch shite for it. Then you go and assume we're all overcooking or seafood because you think you've got the magic method.
Posted by magicman534
The dirty dell
Member since May 2011
1902 posts
Posted on 4/2/22 at 2:54 pm to
Rolling boil, dump crawfish in, once they float and you see some foam or bubbles building cut it off. I Do not get back to a boil. Never had them undercooked. I do soak for approx 20-30 min as well
Posted by Gaston
Dirty Coast
Member since Aug 2008
41694 posts
Posted on 4/2/22 at 4:41 pm to
frick y’all for the downvotes.
Posted by TigerMan327
Elsewhere
Member since Feb 2011
6285 posts
Posted on 4/2/22 at 5:41 pm to
Once the crawfish float to the top they are cooked. No need to get it to a rolling boil.

Also if you cool the pot down to ~150-160 you’ll never have to fear overcooking and can soak them
For an hour if you want.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram