Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

USA Today article on Cajun vs Creole cooking.

Posted on 3/30/21 at 11:20 pm
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
52613 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 11:20 pm
difference in cuisines

Found it interesting, although lacking in depth, it's a 30,000' view of the differences and explains some of the banter here about whether a dish should or should not include tomatoes.
Posted by Phideaux
Cades Cove
Member since May 2008
2635 posts
Posted on 3/30/21 at 11:31 pm to
Not a bad read overall
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29826 posts
Posted on 3/31/21 at 6:06 am to
Not bad, VERY high level. No attempt to bring to note the actual Cajun region of Louisiana, so the effort grade gets an "L" for lazy. The picture of "Cajun jambalaya" looks tasteless. He should look up pochej's thread on this board to get an idea.

The author has another article related to Gulf Coast seafood, but you guessed it, New Orleans is pretty much the only reference point.
This post was edited on 3/31/21 at 6:17 am
Posted by BigDropper
Member since Jul 2009
8840 posts
Posted on 3/31/21 at 6:21 am to
Thanks for sharing.

I don't disagree with what he's saying but, it seems like he hasn't added anything new to the conversation and just parroted a broad overgeneralization of the subject.

The typical, city urban Creole vs rural country cajun & tomatoes vs no tomatoes comparison is trivial and overstated.

But his one had me perplexed?

quote:


Roux with butter vs roux with oil


Wouldn't rural people have better access to animal fats for roux making? Is seems like he's trying to compare the two on historical level & fails to consider how rural people subsisted off of their surroundings. I'm understanding the use of the term "oil" to refer to plant based oils.

Anyway, it's always interesting to get an outsider's POV on Louisiana's culture.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24440 posts
Posted on 3/31/21 at 7:38 am to
quote:

Roux with butter vs roux with oil


Oh snap, is this going to be the new tomato or no tomato argument? Let’s go
This post was edited on 3/31/21 at 7:39 am
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
52613 posts
Posted on 3/31/21 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Wouldn't rural people have better access to animal fats for roux making? 
My family was poor as dirt and even as late as the late 50's / early 60's can remember churning butter with my grandmother from her cow.
This post was edited on 3/31/21 at 8:37 am
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
87960 posts
Posted on 3/31/21 at 10:10 am to
quote:

But his one had me perplexed?


Mine would be:

quote:

Cajuns, in their relative cultural isolation, had no access to the produce staple


This just cannot be true.
Posted by RedHawk
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
9733 posts
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:56 pm to
I always thought it was like this:

Creole - Use Tomatoes
Cajuns - Don't Use Tomatoes
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
87960 posts
Posted on 3/31/21 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Creole - Use Tomatoes
Cajuns - Don't Use Tomatoes


I guess if you are speaking in terms of certain dishes, yes. But, across the board, no. Both sides of my family come from prairie Cajun families, and tomatoes are used often. Just not in the dishes this board objects to
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram