Started By
Message

re: Full N.O. City Council to Vote on Smoking Ban in All Restaurants, etc.

Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:21 pm to
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78461 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

So innocents suffer for that freedom. I'm fairly positive this country was not founded to protect businesses at the cost of individuals.




Who the frick is innocent? If you voluntarily take part in any activity you know there will be risk. Alcohol WILL kill you, a responsible person doesn't consume that amount.

Protecting innocent people would mean never selling an individual more alcohol than could kill them.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78461 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:23 pm to
quote:


I don't have a keg of KBS in my home.


You're no 8thyear

I get the argument for not wanting to be around smoke, hell I don't like it.

Kind of hard for me to defend entering an establishment legally selling a poison and then someone complaining about the environment harming them.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89137 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

If you voluntarily take part in any activity you know there will be risk


You brought up fire codes. It is fair to assume that a business open to the public operates within the law. If I get injured due to that business not adhering to the law, they are responsible, not me.

quote:

Protecting innocent people would mean never selling an individual more alcohol than could kill them.


And there are regulations about serving people that are too intoxicated.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89137 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Kind of hard for me to defend entering an establishment legally selling a poison and then someone complaining about the environment harming them.




Do you not see the difference between choosing to ingest alcohol on your own versus inhaling someone else's smoke?
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86239 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

Do you not see the difference between choosing to ingest alcohol on your own versus inhaling someone else's smoke?


you are choosing to ingest smoke when you enter a smoking establishment...
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
104059 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

I don't see the differencr between this and fire code regulations. If a bar doesn't want sprinkler systems or alternate exits it is on them. Sure, adding exits and sprinkler systems have proven to save lives, but it should be a choice.


Oh, they don't have to comply with all the codes... they also don't have to receive an occupancy permit.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78461 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

It is fair to assume that a business open to the public operates within the law. If I get injured due to that business not adhering to the law, they are responsible, not me.


I think this is the whole point. Arbitrary laws put in place because things such as smoking have fallen out of fashion.


quote:

And there are regulations about serving people that are too intoxicated.

yet I can go buy 3 1/5th of jack and tell the cashier I am going to drink them while driving home.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78461 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

you are choosing to ingest smoke when you enter a smoking establishment...


Exactly.

I am choosing old IPA's or dirty taplines going to certain bars. Therefore I don't go.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78461 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

Oh, they don't have to comply with all the codes... they also don't have to receive an occupancy permit.



I agree, they are forced to operate a certain way. They can't argue or protest because they have little to no power.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89137 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

Arbitrary laws put in place because things such as smoking have fallen out of fashion.



50,000 nonsmokers die each year because of smoking. That isn't arbitrary.

quote:

yet I can go buy 3 1/5th of jack and tell the cashier I am going to drink them while driving home.



That's not at a bar, and has nothing to do with what we're discussing here.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78461 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

50,000 nonsmokers die each year because of smoking. That isn't arbitrary.

All due to second hand smoke in bars?


quote:

That's not at a bar, and has nothing to do with what we're discussing here.

so you agree the laws are arbitrary
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89137 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

All due to second hand smoke in bars?


Are there stipulations on where you can and cannot rape someone?

quote:

so you agree the laws are arbitrary


You're not very good at logic. You should let Salmon take over for you.
This post was edited on 1/8/15 at 2:36 pm
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78461 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

Are there stipulations on where you can and cannot rape someone?



So rape and second hand smoke are equivalent. All for banning it. Not just in bars though.


quote:

You're not very good at logic. You should let Salmon take over for you.


logic is a bartender gets in trouble for overserving, a cashier doesn't. Random laws.
Posted by LSUzealot
Napoleon and Magazine
Member since Sep 2003
57656 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:44 pm to
Trolling LNCHBOX is like taking candy from a baby.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89137 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

So rape and second hand smoke are equivalent.


I'd venture to say that less people die from rape than secondhand smoke. However.secondhand smoke is basically rape of a nonsmoker's lungs, so it's kind of a moot point.

quote:

logic is a bartender gets in trouble for overserving, a cashier doesn't


So you're making a pretty big assumption that a cashier will sell to an obviously intoxicated person. Are you confident in that assumption? You shouldn't be:

quote:

If you sell alcohol to a minor or a visibly intoxicated person
you could be convicted of a Class A Violation or a Class A
Misdemeanor depending on the facts and circumstances of the
infraction.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89137 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:45 pm to
How have been trolled exactly? If anything it's just the opposite. But congrats on the win
Posted by Ex-Popcorn
Member since Nov 2005
2369 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

I'm fairly positive this country was not founded to protect businesses at the cost of individuals.


LMAO. This country was EXACTLY founded to protect private property rights from government dictate!!! You couldn't be more wrong. lol.

quote:

“No other rights are safe where property is not safe.” — Daniel Webster
“The right of distribution over private property is the essence of freedom.” — Merrill Jenkins


quote:

The American moron . . . wants to keep his Ford, even at the cost of losing the Bill of Rights.
H. L. Mencken


quote:

“Government is instituted to protect property of every sort. . . This being the end of government, that alone is a just government, which impartially secures to every man, whatever is his own.” - James Madison


quote:

It is easy for an urban-suburbanite majority to trample the rights of a minority to achieve, in
the majority's estimate, a "public good." So easy is it to fall into this trap that the majority fails to
recognize that the doctrine of the "public good" is a two-edged sword that can easily slay their own
freedom. The so-called public good is both dynamic and relative, quickly changingwith thewhims
of society. Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Warren Burger emphasized this point in United
Steelworkers v. Weber, “[B]eware the ‘good result,’ achieved by judicially unauthorized or intellectually
dishonest means on the appealing notion that the desirable ends justify the improper
judicial means. For there is always the danger that the seeds of precedent sown by good men for
the best of motives will yield a rich harvest of unprincipled acts of others also aiming at “good
ends.” Unless the rights of every citizen are protected at all times, freedom is an
illusion. Today's majority could become tomorrow’s minority.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
104059 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

agree, they are forced to operate a certain way. They can't argue or protest because they have little to no power.


So you're an anarchist.

Which surprises me none!
Posted by Oenophile Brah
The Edge of Sanity
Member since Jan 2013
7569 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

I'd venture to say that less people die from rape than secondhand smoke

Not based on a percentage of those exposed to either.

Always nice to find a LNCHBOX thread.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89137 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

This country was EXACTLY founded to protect private property rights from government dictate!!! You couldn't be more wrong. lol.


Are my lungs not my property? Why do you get to kill me just so you can smoke?
Jump to page
Page First 14 15 16 17 18 ... 21
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 16 of 21Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram