- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 6/28/10 at 4:06 pm to Lester Earl
Blows what off? Changing the rule?
I always thought the league was a democracy.
I always thought the league was a democracy.
Posted on 6/28/10 at 4:06 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
then quit fricking arguing back if u think that.
I just did.
Posted on 6/28/10 at 4:07 pm to rondo
quote:
Blows what off? Changing the rule?
these things have been put up for a vote in the past, or the opposing team has made the decision on whether to let it pass or not.
Posted on 6/28/10 at 4:07 pm to rmc
quote:You are a son of a bitch Rick
fricking rummel trash.
Posted on 6/28/10 at 4:09 pm to Lester Earl
first of all, im not blowing shite off, im at work, and im also reading this to see what the opinions are from the league
second, to change a rule, you need like 2/3 or whatever it is to do it.
and again, im sort of still waiting for you to say when a lineup mistake has been corrected. BOTH cases in tdbbl were fixed when there was NO PRECEDENT set previously.
you say that others have gotten changes, it definitely wasnt on my watch this season
second, to change a rule, you need like 2/3 or whatever it is to do it.
and again, im sort of still waiting for you to say when a lineup mistake has been corrected. BOTH cases in tdbbl were fixed when there was NO PRECEDENT set previously.
you say that others have gotten changes, it definitely wasnt on my watch this season
Posted on 6/28/10 at 4:09 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
these things have been put up for a vote in the past
I only recall voting on changing the rule in the next season.
quote:
or the opposing team has made the decision on whether to let it pass or not.
The opposing team isn't the only team affected, bro.
Nevermind, I'm not arguing anymore.
Posted on 6/28/10 at 4:09 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
these things have been put up for a vote in the past, or the opposing team has made the decision on whether to let it pass or not.
I only recall a vote happening once in all the leagues and if memoty serves the guy didnt get his stats.
But I'm old and the memory isnt what it used to be.
I need some Ginko Biloba
Posted on 6/28/10 at 4:11 pm to Ron Mexico
quote:
you say that others have gotten changes, it definitely wasnt on my watch this season
no, and it could have been in the basketball league , i dont remember. I just remember it had happened, because i was pissed and i remember being mad.
im not looking to change a rule. In the past we have put it up for a vote to change the points, not the rule.
Posted on 6/28/10 at 4:12 pm to reddman
"dear god, make me a bird, so i can fly far, far far away from here"
this is becoming miserable. the last two weeks, the only thing anyone was talking about was Boo's trade and now this.
The fact that you three argued for the past three pages should prompt all of you to look in the mirror and see who's an adult and who wakes up before 8am
Posted on 6/28/10 at 4:16 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:and since the trades were approved, i havent heard a peep of complaining. we accepted the rules and moved on
the only thing anyone was talking about was Boo's trade
Posted on 6/28/10 at 4:16 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
im not looking to change a rule. In the past we have put it up for a vote to change the points, not the rule.
and thats for the birds.
We need to apply the rule or get rid of it.
Posted on 6/28/10 at 4:17 pm to Ron Mexico
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/28/10 at 4:19 pm
Posted on 6/28/10 at 4:18 pm to Rouge
quote:
and since the trades were approved, i havent heard a peep of complaining. we accepted the rules and moved on
right. after 21 pages of riff raff. you are a grown as man
Posted on 6/28/10 at 4:19 pm to GynoSandberg
Ron, basically it boils down to
Against
NOBES
Reddman
Rouge, I think?
Doesnt care
cwill
rick
port
rmc316
gyno??
you are the commish. If u can make a unbiased decision about what to do(vote, ask Rmc316, or decide for yourself), then do it and lets put an end to this.
it is just one point, and it could affect my playoff chances as well as another teams.
but my final say, is that i think i caught it in enough time, before any games started, to get that point. that is my final contention
Against
NOBES
Reddman
Rouge, I think?
Doesnt care
cwill
rick
port
rmc316
gyno??
you are the commish. If u can make a unbiased decision about what to do(vote, ask Rmc316, or decide for yourself), then do it and lets put an end to this.
it is just one point, and it could affect my playoff chances as well as another teams.
but my final say, is that i think i caught it in enough time, before any games started, to get that point. that is my final contention
Posted on 6/28/10 at 4:20 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
The fact that you three argued for the past three pages should prompt all of you to look in the mirror and see who's an adult and who wakes up before 8am
You're right, I will gladly pay my entry fee next year and set my lineups daily and put effort into a draft but not ask that rules be followed accordingly because that would be childish.
Posted on 6/28/10 at 4:21 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
If u can make a unbiased decision about what to do
the only unbiased decision is to stand by the rule.
Any argument otherwise is fricking bullshite.
Posted on 6/28/10 at 4:23 pm to rondo
nobes, it just seems like u have an agenda here.
you have never been this Malcom X over the same issues in the past.
you seem to be in the minority here, at the present moment.
Lets see how it plays out
you have never been this Malcom X over the same issues in the past.
quote:
the only unbiased decision is to stand by the rule.
Any argument otherwise is fricking bullshite.
you seem to be in the minority here, at the present moment.
Lets see how it plays out
This post was edited on 6/28/10 at 4:25 pm
Posted on 6/28/10 at 4:25 pm to rondo
I think the rule is retarded in this instance, but I see the point to not letting anything slide.
Similarly to if someone say, traded away a SS and didn't have a chance to put the one they had on their bench in their lineup. No good reason why they shouldn't get stats that day.
Similarly to if someone say, traded away a SS and didn't have a chance to put the one they had on their bench in their lineup. No good reason why they shouldn't get stats that day.
Posted on 6/28/10 at 4:25 pm to rondo
quote:
You arent taking a common sense approach.
Yes, actually I am. Les didn't have 3 days to drop someone, he had to do it AFTER lineups had locked on Saturday. It's not like he could have done it as soon as he agreed to the trade unless he actually included the guy he was going to drop (and he's already stated he wasn't sure who he was going to drop).
If the extra player gave Les an advantage then I would be the 1st one saying that it shouldn't count. You keep saying that it's going to cause future problems. I think that if it gives someone an unfair advantage then the stats should not count. If it doesn't I don't see the harm in allowing the stats to count.
That is called using common sense.
Page 27 of 34
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News