Started By
Message

re: TDFL

Posted on 7/20/12 at 11:45 am to
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
48451 posts
Posted on 7/20/12 at 11:45 am to
quote:

As of right now, all fg are worth 3 points and extra points are worth 1


Makes them an afterthought in the league. Most of them will sell for $1-$2.

I think we should add some bonus points for longer FGs and punish kickers for missing chip shots.

0-39 3 points
40-49 4 points
50+ 5 points

FG Miss < 30 yards -2
All other misses -1
Missed XPs -1
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 7/20/12 at 11:47 am to
I'm with you. I like the increasing scale.
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 7/20/12 at 11:53 am to
Why would a missed fg be more penalizing than a missed xp?
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74400 posts
Posted on 7/20/12 at 11:58 am to
because XP are only worth 1? idk
Posted by TthomasJR
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2006
17323 posts
Posted on 7/20/12 at 11:59 am to
I like adding points, but don't like subtracting for misses.
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
48451 posts
Posted on 7/20/12 at 12:03 pm to
We could make all misses -1 and keep the additional points for longer FGs..
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77515 posts
Posted on 7/20/12 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

We could make all misses -1 and keep the additional points for longer FGs..



Standard IMO
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31253 posts
Posted on 7/20/12 at 12:51 pm to
For made FG, I prefer .1 point for every yard. A 38-yard FG would be worth 3.8 points. It is more accurate than doing a range because a 40 yarder is definitely easier than a 49 yarder, yet they get the same number of points. XP is worth 1.

However, I am not sure if any site does this, but I think RealTime would be accomodating and possibly include this option.

Missed XP are -1 IMO. No penalty for missed FG is what I think would be the best.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290658 posts
Posted on 7/20/12 at 2:52 pm to
I think all misses should be -1. Including PAT
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 7/20/12 at 2:58 pm to
Yeah I think the decimal system is the only one that is offered since our other scoring is like that.
Posted by rmc
Truth or Consequences
Member since Sep 2004
27358 posts
Posted on 7/20/12 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

We could make all misses -1 and keep the additional points for longer FGs..


Didn't it use to be that way and then mccain went full retard?
Posted by rmc
Truth or Consequences
Member since Sep 2004
27358 posts
Posted on 7/20/12 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

For made FG, I prefer .1 point for every yard. A 38-yard FG would be worth 3.8 points. It is more accurate than doing a range because a 40 yarder is definitely easier than a 49 yarder, yet they get the same number of points. XP is worth 1.


I agree with decimals, but I think the minimum should be 3. It'd kinda be bullshite to get 2.3 points on a 23 yard field goal when 6 points are given for every TD.
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31253 posts
Posted on 7/20/12 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

I agree with decimals, but I think the minimum should be 3. It'd kinda be bullshite to get 2.3 points on a 23 yard field goal when 6 points are given for every TD.

Yeah, that makes sense. I prefer rewarding kickers for longer kicks than a standard 3. Also, decimals over range for sure is better.

As far as penalties go for FG misses, I would just have misses be a uniform 0 or -1, regardless of distance.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74400 posts
Posted on 7/20/12 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

It'd kinda be bullshite to get 2.3 points on a 23 yard field goal when 6 points are given for every TD.


It's a 23 yard field goal. Thats almost an XP. If you're going to decimals making that 3 points defeats the purpose
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 7/23/12 at 8:32 pm to
Bubbz, how is raw 1000 brother??
Posted by bubbz
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
23117 posts
Posted on 7/23/12 at 8:50 pm to
Pretty sad to see most of these guys. Most of them are nothing more than your typical "wrestler" type people in the real world. Most of them struggling to make a living, while still trying to live off the fame they once had in the wrestling industry. Prime example is Scott Hall. My have the mighty have fallen.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290658 posts
Posted on 7/23/12 at 8:52 pm to
did mark henry make an appearence?

who do you think is going to fight the rock at royal rumble?
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 7/23/12 at 8:53 pm to
Did they really bring Hall back tonight?
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 7/23/12 at 8:53 pm to
This post was edited on 7/23/12 at 8:54 pm
Posted by bubbz
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
23117 posts
Posted on 7/23/12 at 8:57 pm to
No on Henry

No they didn't. He probably is going through his 10th stint of rehab. The ESPN 30 for 30 was eye popping. Dude looked like "The Wrestler" in real life.
first pageprev pagePage 43 of 91Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram