- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/29/19 at 8:34 am to reddman
quote:
Rule Changes to Vote on
1. If an owner chooses to leave the league, he is permanently banned from the league from that point forward.
2. Create a minimum AB requirement each week (150 ABs?).
3. Eliminate the "or six starts" from the IP pitching requirement each scoring period, due to TB approach to starting rotations.
4. Make the minor league threshold for pitchers to also include a 50 game limit along with the current 150 IP limit.
These were potential rules suggestions made over the course of last year. Would anyone like to formally pursue them and begin discussions/voting?
Posted on 1/29/19 at 8:37 am to reddman
We should get that voting going.
1. No unless someone destroys their team the way they did in that basketball league.
2. Don't care.
3. Fine with it being 35 innings flat.
4. Yes. The GP is needed.
1. No unless someone destroys their team the way they did in that basketball league.
2. Don't care.
3. Fine with it being 35 innings flat.
4. Yes. The GP is needed.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 8:46 am to reddman
No on the 1st 2.
3. Dont care either way on this one. If voting, I vote no.
4. Yes
3. Dont care either way on this one. If voting, I vote no.
4. Yes
Posted on 1/29/19 at 8:48 am to reddman
1. Don’t care
2. Not necessary
3. Eliminate 6 starts
4. Yes
2. Not necessary
3. Eliminate 6 starts
4. Yes
Posted on 1/29/19 at 8:48 am to reddman
1. I think it should be case by case. But their fate should be decided immediately.
2. I don't really understand this one. Is this to keep people from tanking?
3. No. I think this is a fad and will go away.
4. Fine with this.
2. I don't really understand this one. Is this to keep people from tanking?
3. No. I think this is a fad and will go away.
4. Fine with this.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 8:53 am to papz
quote:
1. No unless someone destroys their team the way they did in that basketball league.
2. Don't care.
3. Fine with it being 35 innings flat.
4. Yes. The GP is needed.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 9:01 am to rondo
1) No unless they were doing shady shite before leaving in which case the league wouldnt let them back in anyways. Dont think rule is necessary
2) No
3) I guess. Wouldnt want RPs getting starts being a determining factor in key FSBDL matchups down the road. I can see the 15 pages of bitching & complaining now if it factored in a playoff game.
4) yes
2) No
3) I guess. Wouldnt want RPs getting starts being a determining factor in key FSBDL matchups down the road. I can see the 15 pages of bitching & complaining now if it factored in a playoff game.
4) yes
Posted on 1/29/19 at 9:03 am to TTownTiger
We can go ahead and eliminate voting on the first two now. It's obvious that they won't pass.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 9:07 am to reddman
1. Yes
2. No
3. No
4. Yes
2. No
3. No
4. Yes
Posted on 1/29/19 at 9:07 am to reddman
quote:
Rule Changes to Vote on
1. If an owner chooses to leave the league, he is permanently banned from the league from that point forward.
2. Create a minimum AB requirement each week (150 ABs?).
3. Eliminate the "or six starts" from the IP pitching requirement each scoring period, due to TB approach to starting rotations.
4. Make the minor league threshold for pitchers to also include a 50 game limit along with the current 150 IP limit.
1. Don't see the need for a rule, don't we all technically have to approve new owners anyway? If someone left on shady terms we just wouldn't approve.
2. Nay.
3. I'm good with just the IP requirement.
4. Abstain.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 9:08 am to LSUBoo
Harper to Phillies.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 9:16 am to reddman
I saw that Vegas twitter site tweet that last night
Is it confirmed?
Is it confirmed?
Posted on 1/29/19 at 9:18 am to LSUBoo
quote:
1. Don't see the need for a rule, don't we all technically have to approve new owners anyway? If someone left on shady terms we just wouldn't approve.
I think the spirit of the rule is to make people second guess bailing.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 9:21 am to MrWiseGuy
quote:
I saw that Vegas twitter site tweet that last night
Is it confirmed?
It's not, but there sure is a lot of chatter about it. Would be surprised if it wasn't true.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 9:36 am to reddman
quote:
1. If an owner chooses to leave the league, he is permanently banned from the league from that point forward.
2. Create a minimum AB requirement each week (150 ABs?).
3. Eliminate the "or six starts" from the IP pitching requirement each scoring period, due to TB approach to starting rotations.
4. Make the minor league threshold for pitchers to also include a 50 game limit along with the current 150 IP limit.
1. How about, if you leave you can only be re-admitted by unanimous vote of the owners.
2. Nay.
3. Yay, just a minimum IP.
4. Nay.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 9:37 am to reddman
No
No
Yes
Don't care.
No
Yes
Don't care.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 9:51 am to RollDatRoll
Polls for the last two amendments have been posted on the website. Please vote ASAP. Thanks.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 9:58 am to reddman
1. No
2. Yes.
So everyone seems alright that another team could benefit from playing a bad team who doesn’t bother to fill an active roster with daily AB and getting an easy week? Inactivity creates an imbalance in H2H leagues. Holding down starting roster spots with a player who’ll receive 250 AB is a loophole to hang onto younger players if you’re a cellar dweller. It’s dead. People seemed confused on it so i wanted to throw out some examples.
3. Yes.
4. Yes.
2. Yes.
So everyone seems alright that another team could benefit from playing a bad team who doesn’t bother to fill an active roster with daily AB and getting an easy week? Inactivity creates an imbalance in H2H leagues. Holding down starting roster spots with a player who’ll receive 250 AB is a loophole to hang onto younger players if you’re a cellar dweller. It’s dead. People seemed confused on it so i wanted to throw out some examples.
3. Yes.
4. Yes.
Posted on 1/29/19 at 9:59 am to swamie
What would be the penalty for not having 150 ABs per week?
This post was edited on 1/29/19 at 10:00 am
Page 75 of 259
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News