- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Officer lets DWI go, driver hits someone after, what's the charge for the officer?
Posted on 11/11/19 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 11/11/19 at 12:54 pm
If a cop lets someone go after stopping them for DWI, and that person hits someone shortly after, is the cop an accessory?
Say he tested the driver and the driver failed. Are there any criminal charges that can be filed or is the a civil action?
If it's criminal, can anyone link a case/news story for something like this.
I've heard bartenders are responsible for DWI of overserved customers, are police different?
Say he tested the driver and the driver failed. Are there any criminal charges that can be filed or is the a civil action?
If it's criminal, can anyone link a case/news story for something like this.
I've heard bartenders are responsible for DWI of overserved customers, are police different?
Posted on 11/11/19 at 12:56 pm to Kujo
Is this 1/10000000 hypothetical situation really deserving of it's own thread?
Posted on 11/11/19 at 12:57 pm to Kujo
quote:
If it's criminal, can anyone link a case/news story for something like this.
Do you own fricking work.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 1:01 pm to Kujo
Judges,who have let a felon go that goes out and kills someone, are never held responsible.
Conservative media will bash the judge, but CNN, etc. will say nothing about the decision of the judges
Conservative media will bash the judge, but CNN, etc. will say nothing about the decision of the judges
Posted on 11/11/19 at 1:02 pm to Kujo
2 weeks of paid leave, if said incident happened in BR.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 1:22 pm to Kujo
Not sure what cops you interact with but that shite ain't happening. If the officer is feeling super generous the best possible case for the perp is being allowed to call a friend or a cab. That cop isn't giving you your keys back until you sleep it off.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 1:23 pm to PCRammer
Say it happened, what's the charge?
Posted on 11/11/19 at 1:23 pm to Kujo
quote:
Say he tested the driver and the driver failed
Then he better not let them drive away.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 1:23 pm to Kujo
This actually happened in Baton Rouge within the last few years. If I remember correctly, a BRPD officer stopped a vehicle and questioned the driver about possibly being impaired. The driver somehow talked his/her way out of it and the cop let them go. The driver then drove a few miles down the road and killed someone on Florida Boulevard.
I tried to find the article and cannot find it at the moment.
I tried to find the article and cannot find it at the moment.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 1:35 pm to TigersSEC2010
Looks like a no.
quote:
The injured pedestrian plaintiff’s suit alleged several claims against the officers and the City, but the case turned on whether the failure to stop the drunk driver was a deprivation of the injured plaintiff’s due process rights. This appears to have been a creative attempt by the plaintiff to recover damages for his injuries, but well-established case law should have foreshadowed the outcome. In particular, the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in DeShaney v. Winnebago County which held “a State’s failure to protect an individual against private violence simply does not constitute a violation of the Due Process Clause.” The District Court set out the test for determining whether an individual could sue as an exception to the general rule in DeShaney. In order to bring a claim under the “state created danger” exception, a plaintiff must show: (1) an affirmative act by the state that either created or increased the risk that the plaintiff would be exposed to an act of violence by a third party; (2) a special danger to the plaintiff wherein the state’s actions placed the plaintiff specifically at risk, as distinguished from a risk that affects the public at large; and (3) the state knew or should have known that its actions specifically endangered the plaintiff. Under this test, it seems fairly clear that a police officer cannot be held responsible for failing to arrest a drunk driver.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 2:09 pm to Kujo
Depends. Whats the race of the drunk and the officer?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News