- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Reason Paul's Question was not asked...... Treason/coup
Posted on 1/30/20 at 10:53 pm
Posted on 1/30/20 at 10:53 pm
Period.
Read Rand's Question:
Senator Rand Paul: My question today is about whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with Schiff staffers to plot impeaching the President before there were formal House impeachment proceedings.
My exact question was:
Are you aware that House intelligence committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close relationship with Eric Ciaramella while at the National Security Council together and are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the President before there were formal house impeachment proceedings.
And Schitt was involved.
The reason it was not allowed to be asked is that it shines a VERY BRIGHT LIGHT on what happened.
What do you call a "PLOT" (Rand's words) to take out a sitting president by falsifying FISAs, testimony, etc....
????
Read Rand's Question:
Senator Rand Paul: My question today is about whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with Schiff staffers to plot impeaching the President before there were formal House impeachment proceedings.
My exact question was:
Are you aware that House intelligence committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close relationship with Eric Ciaramella while at the National Security Council together and are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the President before there were formal house impeachment proceedings.
And Schitt was involved.
The reason it was not allowed to be asked is that it shines a VERY BRIGHT LIGHT on what happened.
What do you call a "PLOT" (Rand's words) to take out a sitting president by falsifying FISAs, testimony, etc....
????
8
Posted on 1/30/20 at 10:56 pm to Jjdoc
Roberts is there to preside, he is not there to refuse to ask legitimate questions that get to the very origin of the impeachment sham.
Roberts continues to be a POS and massive failure as CJ.
Roberts continues to be a POS and massive failure as CJ.
Posted on 1/30/20 at 11:26 pm to Jjdoc
Not happy it wasn't asked, POTUS Lawyer's spoke to all of this on the floor though in essence getting the same information out as asking the question would have. Democrats would have clearly filibustered and not touched the meat, so it's all out in the public just like it would have been otherwise.
Posted on 1/30/20 at 11:29 pm to Mizzoufan26
And here is what everybody needs to understand..
1- The world was listening! They heard the truth.
2- Had witnesses been allowed (still could be), it will continue to come out.
3- If it ends Saturday as Cruz suggests, it will not stop the facts from coming out and the DOJ acting.
All this did was to show the world what actually happened.
1- The world was listening! They heard the truth.
2- Had witnesses been allowed (still could be), it will continue to come out.
3- If it ends Saturday as Cruz suggests, it will not stop the facts from coming out and the DOJ acting.
All this did was to show the world what actually happened.
Posted on 1/30/20 at 11:34 pm to CDawson
quote:
Roberts continues to be a POS
Another massive Bush failure.
Posted on 1/30/20 at 11:37 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
3- If it ends Saturday as Cruz suggests, it will not stop the facts from coming out and the DOJ acting.
Boomerang
Posted on 1/30/20 at 11:42 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
What do you call a "PLOT" (Rand's words) to take out a sitting president by falsifying FISAs, testimony, etc....
Conspiracy to commit sedition.
Lots and lots if talk about "conspiracies" lately. Funny that.
Posted on 1/31/20 at 4:34 am to Jjdoc
And nothing will ever happen. Nothing. It’s all a clownshow for the infotainment groups.
Posted on 1/31/20 at 4:54 am to Jjdoc
This whole thing was cooked up out of whole cloth by a handful of virulent anti-Trumpers who had been waiting for years to find an excuse to build a scheme. They just happened to be in positions where they could. It would be no different than letting half a dozen of the worst anti-Trump kooks on here cook up something.
That is the sole reason for the "his name must be unspoken" idiocy.
If nobody knows who he is why can Eric Ciamella not be mentioned? Nobody knows that is the "whistleblower".
This is how you get a farce that ends with the children fighting over the mic like last night.
Where'd the leftists here go in the last couple of days? especially the a-hole saying Trump would be gone in 4 weeks? They never appear in the fun threads other than to occasionally spout their "both sides" bullshite when they have no argument.
That is the sole reason for the "his name must be unspoken" idiocy.
If nobody knows who he is why can Eric Ciamella not be mentioned? Nobody knows that is the "whistleblower".
This is how you get a farce that ends with the children fighting over the mic like last night.
Where'd the leftists here go in the last couple of days? especially the a-hole saying Trump would be gone in 4 weeks? They never appear in the fun threads other than to occasionally spout their "both sides" bullshite when they have no argument.
Posted on 1/31/20 at 6:37 am to gthog61
quote:
If nobody knows who he is why can Eric Ciamella not be mentioned? Nobody knows that is the "whistleblower".
Better yet, if Eric Ciarmella is NOT the whistleblower,
why doesn't Eric Ciarmella come forward and demand that
it be known to all that he is not the whistleblower?
Posted on 1/31/20 at 6:52 am to Welwood
quote:
Better yet, if Eric Ciarmella is NOT the whistleblower,
why doesn't Eric Ciarmella come forward and demand that
it be known to all that he is not the whistleblower?
Or better yet why wasn't Colonel Vidman prosecuted for leaking classified to the "so called whistleblower"?
Posted on 1/31/20 at 6:59 am to Jjdoc
There is no real reason the "whistleblower" (or any of his defenders) can articulate as to why he believes he needs "whistleblower" protections. This is something that can't be harped on enough. What has Trump done to ANYONE that would make them think he's going to threaten their livelihood. If you come forward with a false accusation, or really no substantive information, you can expect Trump to use his words to drag you through the mud, and he's done that plenty. But what kind of damage has he wrongfully done to someone putting him on blast?
This post was edited on 1/31/20 at 7:00 am
Posted on 1/31/20 at 7:04 am to CDawson
quote:And what does he get for his effort? LizzyWarren shite in his cornflakes on national TV.
Roberts is there to preside, he is not there to refuse to ask legitimate questions that get to the very origin of the impeachment sham.
Roberts continues to be a POS and massive failure as CJ.
Posted on 1/31/20 at 7:13 am to Jjdoc
History books will show Roberts was complicit in covering up a coup attempt by the Democratic Party.
Congrats on that dumbass
Congrats on that dumbass
Posted on 1/31/20 at 7:18 am to ItNeverRains
I agree.
It absolutely amazes me how the neverTrumpers are so totally out of touch with reality.
It absolutely amazes me how the neverTrumpers are so totally out of touch with reality.
Posted on 1/31/20 at 7:20 am to Jjdoc
quote:I think you are giving Americans too much credit. A small percentage of the voters actually watched the shitstorm and a smaller percentage were swayed by what they saw on tv (assuming that they watched). Most had their minds made up before it started. Very few were changed. Most are relying on their tv "news" to tell them what to think. Not many people switched from MSNBC to OANN because of this.
And here is what everybody needs to understand..
1- The world was listening! They heard the truth.
Posted on 1/31/20 at 7:51 am to Jjdoc
It sucked but it ended up uniting Cruz, Graham and a frickton of others into that blockbuster question that made Schiff so furious that his answer was nothing but obvious defensiveness. LINK
Throwing a Schiff-fit as an answer
quote:
Recent reporting described two NSC staff holdovers from the Obama Administration attending an all-hands meeting of NSC staff held about two weeks into the Trump Administration. And talking loudly enough to be overheard saying, ‘We need to do everything we can to take out the President.' On July 26th, 2019 the House Intelligence Committee hired one of those individuals, Sean Misko. The report further describes relationships between Misko, Lieutenant Colonel Vindman, and an individual alleged as the 'whistleblower.'
Why did your committee hire Sean Misko the day after the phone call between President Trump and Zelensky?
Throwing a Schiff-fit as an answer
Posted on 1/31/20 at 7:53 am to ItNeverRains
Time for Garrison to make a GIF with Chief Justice Roberts with his thumb on the balance scale of Justice.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News