- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Did this prosecutor in the Rittenhouse trial want to prosecute this case?
Posted on 11/4/21 at 2:15 pm
Posted on 11/4/21 at 2:15 pm
Or was he pressured to do so??
Because it’s apparent he doesn’t have a case to make. He has had to lead on one of his own witnesses and was cut off from commenting on his response. And his own questioning is making some of the defense’s points. I mean he is playing and replaying the first Darwin Award winner chasing Rittenhouse. And his own witness has told the court that he was going for his gun. And also confirming he was not aggressive toward anyone.
Did this guy just stomp his foot to prosecute or did he get pressured to? He had to have been pressured to…. Right?
Because it’s apparent he doesn’t have a case to make. He has had to lead on one of his own witnesses and was cut off from commenting on his response. And his own questioning is making some of the defense’s points. I mean he is playing and replaying the first Darwin Award winner chasing Rittenhouse. And his own witness has told the court that he was going for his gun. And also confirming he was not aggressive toward anyone.
Did this guy just stomp his foot to prosecute or did he get pressured to? He had to have been pressured to…. Right?
16
Posted on 11/4/21 at 2:18 pm to CleverUserName
He is trophy hunting.
Posted on 11/4/21 at 2:18 pm to CleverUserName
The decisions come from the top
Posted on 11/4/21 at 2:25 pm to CleverUserName
Listen to his questioning. He’s trying to walk a very thin line between self defense and endangering the public. That’s why he kept asking the witness if he felt that he was danger due to Kyle’s actions at any point that night. He seems to be trying to say the threat to Kyle ended when Rosenbum missed the gun. Once he missed, there was no danger, therefore Kyle murdered him thereby endangering the public at large.
Posted on 11/4/21 at 2:25 pm to CleverUserName
Probably a bottom quartile law school grad like Biden.
Posted on 11/4/21 at 2:26 pm to CleverUserName
I haven’t paid any attention to this case until the last couple days but how is this even making it this far? That drone footage was damning to the prosecution. I guess the judge doesn’t want to be the one who dismisses it?
Posted on 11/4/21 at 2:28 pm to CleverUserName
Check this out.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 11/4/21 at 2:29 pm to CleverUserName
he is the useful idiot they handed the turd to. they were supposed to get an activist judge who was on board with railroading him and not allowing any sort of defense like they did with other cases.
now his career will quietly end and he will end up being a law clerk in dumbfrickistan for the rest of his life after going down in flames
now his career will quietly end and he will end up being a law clerk in dumbfrickistan for the rest of his life after going down in flames
Posted on 11/4/21 at 2:35 pm to CleverUserName
I came to this conclusion yesterday after watching some of the trial.
The prosecutor know Rittenhouse was not the aggressor and was acting in self defense. This trial is being done by the DA for two purposes.
1. They are diffusing more violence and riots that would come if they did not press charges.
2. They are using the trial to show that Rittenhouse was acting in self defense.
The prosecution is essentially complimenting the defense arguments. They are letting this play out.
The prosecutor know Rittenhouse was not the aggressor and was acting in self defense. This trial is being done by the DA for two purposes.
1. They are diffusing more violence and riots that would come if they did not press charges.
2. They are using the trial to show that Rittenhouse was acting in self defense.
The prosecution is essentially complimenting the defense arguments. They are letting this play out.
Posted on 11/4/21 at 2:55 pm to CleverUserName
I think he's either stupid or he's deliberately trying to not prosecute Kyle.
Watched some highlights from yesterday, and multiple questions were not only odd but if anything, make Kyle's case stronger.
ETA:
Exactly.
Watched some highlights from yesterday, and multiple questions were not only odd but if anything, make Kyle's case stronger.
ETA:
quote:
I came to this conclusion yesterday after watching some of the trial. The prosecutor know Rittenhouse was not the aggressor and was acting in self defense. This trial is being done by the DA for two purposes. 1. They are diffusing more violence and riots that would come if they did not press charges. 2. They are using the trial to show that Rittenhouse was acting in self defense. The prosecution is essentially complimenting the defense arguments. They are letting this play out.
Exactly.
This post was edited on 11/4/21 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 11/4/21 at 3:42 pm to CleverUserName
Unfortunately, in our society, there is no cost to a prosecutor who wants to send a message by breaking someone financially.
Posted on 11/4/21 at 4:07 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
Did this prosecutor in the Rittenhouse trial want to prosecute this case?
He's a dirty prosecutor and a soyboy.
Posted on 11/4/21 at 4:51 pm to CleverUserName
I’m definitely making a motion for summary if I’m the defense. The prosecution has not proven they even have a case.
We had a case recently where a “woke” DA tried to railroad some cops. They ended up impeaching their own damn witness After the prosecution rested we motioned for summary and got it. Never even called our own witnesses or presented our case. It was beautiful
We had a case recently where a “woke” DA tried to railroad some cops. They ended up impeaching their own damn witness After the prosecution rested we motioned for summary and got it. Never even called our own witnesses or presented our case. It was beautiful
Posted on 11/4/21 at 5:28 pm to CleverUserName
All I know is that watching this on Court TV right now, this host keeps mentioning that the witness on the stand "works for a conservative site". He's trying to sway public opinion by repeating that, instead of just letting the evidence speak for itself.
Would they mention if he worked for a liberal site? Of course not.
Would they mention if he worked for a liberal site? Of course not.
Posted on 11/4/21 at 5:38 pm to CleverUserName
He has pointy hair and gender neutral glasses. He’s a true believer. He wants Rittenhouse in the Big House.
Posted on 11/4/21 at 5:42 pm to CleverUserName
Are prosecutors hand picked for cases?
Can they say no?
Can they say no?
Posted on 11/4/21 at 8:39 pm to CleverUserName
About as much as a one-legged man wants to hunt mountain lions with a toothpick
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News