Started By
Message

re: SI: Why Does MLB Still Allow Synchronized, Team-Sanctioned Racism in Atlanta?

Posted on 10/28/21 at 9:04 am to
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
9180 posts
Posted on 10/28/21 at 9:04 am to
I get why "Redskins" is racist. Its shallow and doesn't project the positive aspects of native americans.

I can even see why Indians can also be seen as racist since the people who they refer to have never set foot in India.

But Braves? Its literally a mascot that celebrates the fighting spirit of the native americans. The fighting spirit that MANY tribes pride themselves on.

What next? Are the Dallas Cowboys racist for having a mascot that didn't free the slaves?
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
34127 posts
Posted on 10/28/21 at 9:06 am to
quote:

Are the Dallas Cowboys racist for having a mascot that didn't free the slaves?


Probably. With the “my culture is not a costume” push for Halloween basically you can’t dress up or use any real person or group of people. So any team that doesn’t use an animal or inanimate object is on the block
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41289 posts
Posted on 10/28/21 at 10:07 am to
quote:

But Braves? Its literally a mascot that celebrates the fighting spirit of the native americans. The fighting spirit that MANY tribes pride themselves on.


it really celebrates a bunch of "Indians" in Boston throwing tea into the harbor



Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
73679 posts
Posted on 10/28/21 at 11:10 am to
quote:

I get why "Redskins" is racist.


slang term like most used for all peoples.

snowflakes melted over it like redmen of St. John's.

quote:

I can even see why Indians can also be seen as racist




it is fn harmless. it was just a term for native americans. we still call them american indians. keep finding shite to melt over like left wing trash. congrats.
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
25066 posts
Posted on 10/28/21 at 11:37 am to
quote:

I can even see why Indians can also be seen as racist since the people who they refer to have never set foot in India.



Some one (probably a white liberal who are the clear authorities on the matter) should tell the millions of people who proudly call themselves "Indians" and refer to their land as "Indian Country" that they are supposed to be offended.
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49420 posts
Posted on 10/28/21 at 11:46 am to
Indians and Redskins are pretty obvious especially with Cleveland’s mascot being a literal native with redskin, despite what some of the diehards and old heads think, I didn’t have much a problem with either change.

The Braves and their war chant however are different stories they’re not racist terms or racist images of natives, Brave is just a high class warrior in Native culture and their war chant is just an intimidation chant.
Posted by TheRouxGuru
Member since Nov 2019
8738 posts
Posted on 10/29/21 at 6:59 am to
quote:

I get why "Redskins" is racist



Then you’re a pussy too


Holy frickin shite this country is soft as frick…
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram