Started By
Message
locked post

FDA rejects boosters

Posted on 9/17/21 at 2:58 pm
Posted by AubieinNC2009
Mountain NC
Member since Dec 2018
7056 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 2:58 pm
Fuax News

FDA went against Biden

quote:

A U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory panel on Friday declined to endorse the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine booster shot for people ages 16 years and older at least six months following the second dose.

The vote was 2-16. The vote will now go before the FDA to issue a final decision.

During the deliberations, panel members suggested older, vulnerable populations may benefit from boosters, but noted insufficient data among younger groups and concerns over potential increased risk for heart inflammation, particularly among males ages 16-17.
Posted by ZOMGlsutigers
Slidell
Member since Dec 2007
426 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 3:03 pm to
Whoa, is the FDA actually doing work? The approve one vaccine and reject boosters, should I get the vaccine?
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109660 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 3:05 pm to
Think how weird it was that we had elected officials clamoring so hard for the possible need for MOAR SHOTS?
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
26098 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 3:07 pm to
Trust the Science™?
Posted by Texas Yarddog
Member since Apr 2018
2993 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 3:09 pm to
They will turn around and approve within 5 days due to pressire from the *administration and Pfizer.

Similar to how CDC capitulated to the NEA and the *administration a few weeks ago on masks.
Posted by TheAstroTiger
Member since Jun 2018
3101 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

Whoa, is the FDA actually doing work? The approve one vaccine and reject boosters, should I get the vaccine?


Curious to see how Biden spins this.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125344 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

During the deliberations, panel members suggested older, vulnerable populations may benefit from boosters, but noted insufficient data among younger groups and concerns over potential increased risk for heart inflammation, particularly among males ages 16-17.


The panel will need to hear from noted experts LNCHBOX et al.
Posted by Ron Mexiceaux
Member since Oct 2019
116 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 3:14 pm to
Posted by xxTIMMYxx
Member since Aug 2019
17562 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Think how weird it was that we had elected officials clamoring so hard for the possible need for MOAR SHOTS?


Don’t forget tv doctors on the communist network
Posted by Bama Bird
Pittsburgh, PA
Member since Mar 2013
22644 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 3:18 pm to
FDA is very stringent and always has been. Also refused to approve thalidomide when everyone else did.
Posted by Bama Bird
Pittsburgh, PA
Member since Mar 2013
22644 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 3:19 pm to
Easiest way to make it look like they're doing something without doing anything at all. And now half of their base will continue to push for them because they have to be told what they want
Posted by TheAstroTiger
Member since Jun 2018
3101 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

Easiest way to make it look like they're doing something without doing anything at all. And now half of their base will continue to push for them because they have to be told what they want


Also it's now easy for them to say we wanted more shots but the FDA said no forgetting to mention the fact that the FDA bent over backwards for getting the vaccine emergency authorization use.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

FDA rejects boosters



quote:

The vote was 2-16


quote:

The vote will now go before the FDA to issue a final decision.
Posted by WildManGoose
Member since Nov 2005
4600 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

LNCHBOX
His wife and MIL are nurses, man. He's in the know. He's probably known for a week that this was coming down the pipe and stocked up on his boosters.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
79979 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

but noted insufficient data among younger groups and concerns over potential increased risk for heart inflammation, particularly among males ages 16-17.


And the first two doses didn't increase those risks?
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
30894 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

FDA rejects boosters


Come on man!!!!
Posted by dakarx
Member since Sep 2018
8163 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 3:54 pm to
They are just standing there shaking their heads 'no', but of course their hands are extended palms facing up.
Posted by FlexDawg
Member since Jan 2018
14442 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 3:56 pm to
They just changed the article
Posted by Mellow Drama
Making Groceries
Member since Aug 2020
4656 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 3:58 pm to
We The People reject boosters.




oh, yeah, and FRICK JOE BIDEN
Posted by tiger1014
Member since Jan 2011
12675 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 4:45 pm to
Now everyone loves the fda
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram