Started By
Message

re: The 90% vs The 10%

Posted on 9/16/21 at 7:41 am to
Posted by Rosenblatt
Member since Apr 2019
6294 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 7:41 am to
Everyone just stop

Unless you were a jock washer in college, you aren’t allowed to post about college football
Posted by ecb
Member since Jul 2010
9533 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 7:42 am to
Are you telling us O is a good hc?
Posted by Kikicaca
1 Mile from the Atchafalaya
Member since Nov 2016
810 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 7:43 am to
quote:

This team will go as far as the OL will allow. It doesn’t matter who the QB or RB is. I would expect a 10%er to understand that based on what we’ve seen so far. Maybe you belong in on the 90% category.


Guess you are a 10% er after all. In the 10% who either didn't read or didn't comprehend what I am saying. I am saying and have said in this thread for us to win between 9 to 11 games we will need Max or Nuss to take charge and for our O LINE TO STAY HEALTHY.

Check my other post on this subject. My whole thread is mostly about why we looked so vanilla last Saturday which is all about our OL.

Jeeze!
Posted by Le Tenia
Member since Feb 2015
4629 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 7:47 am to
Step off that box! O tinkering with the offense is so over played. Nobody is saying he is calling plays. Relax. If the offense is struggling then of course more eyes are on it. I don't give a shite if Coach Mc jumps in to help game plan if it helps.

His credentials is he is head coach of the team which makes he over the entire team in all phases and personnel. He is responsible for what is going on with this team. End of story.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
38281 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 7:48 am to
quote:

You are kinda right. We can but with the amount of starters out why run it?


Because the entire team needs to practice the timing and execution of basic, fundamental plays against Ive competition. How can they expect to improve if they never do it?

quote:

My take is we didn't have to run a screen that had little chance of working.


Why does it have a little chance of success?

quote:

You run screens that are precision plays with veterans.


Is that why the McNeese St. backups ran a successful screen against us in the 4th quarter?

quote:

Besides save the screens for the SEC.


Could have used them against UCLA when they were teeing off on our QB

quote:

O nervous? I doubt it he could care less about the outside noise.


He should be. Fans are what pay his salary and pony up buy out money.

quote:

If he is nervous it's because of the uninformed unknowlegable 90% here and everywhere who are calling for his head and being picked up by ESPN and the Finebaums of the world.


Why are 90% calling for his head? 90% aren’t calling for Sam Pittman, Eli Drinkowitz, Mark Stoops, or hosts of other coaches because their teams showed improvement over last year and have shown improvement this year.

LSU did not improve on defense at all last year. The same errors that plagued us game 1 plagued us game 10. They also carried over into UCLA. The offense appears to also have regressed despite losing 2 starters, one only being a starter for 3 games last year.
Posted by Le Tenia
Member since Feb 2015
4629 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 7:49 am to
Based on your analysis, I can see why you didn't go further in football or television.
Posted by Kikicaca
1 Mile from the Atchafalaya
Member since Nov 2016
810 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 7:49 am to
quote:

Don’t waste your time replying to this loser. What an embarrassing thread. I’ve seen better walk-on know-it-alls in the quad.


I am sorry youngster I may have missed it but where did you walk-on or got a scholarship to play your college ball?

I am sorry did I break your concentration reading a Harry Potter book or playing with your game boy?
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
59752 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 7:49 am to
quote:

I am saying and have said in this thread for us to win between 9 to 11 games we will need Max or Nuss to take charge and for our O LINE TO STAY HEALTHY.


Wow!! That's some Earth shattering insight. I for one am glad that there's a former college football player on this board who has such extensive knowledge and that you're willing to share. Thanks!

Is it true that to win a game, we need to score more points than the team that we're playing? I didn't play college football, so I'm a little confused on that issue.

Hope you can set me straight soon. Thank you for your service.
Posted by p&g
Dixie
Member since Jun 2005
12995 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 7:51 am to
This is crap .... BS CRAP I TELL YOU!
90% of this board missed their true calling life.

They should be making bank coaching football at upper levels of college and pro.
Idk why they chose to be store clerks and valet attendants but nonetheless.


You throw in the PlayStation pedigree along side with their vast knowledge of watching games..... watch out.
Vince Lombardi doesn’t have shite you on these ED O hating clowns.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
38281 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 7:52 am to
quote:

Guess you are a 10% er after all. In the 10% who either didn't read or didn't comprehend what I am saying. I am saying and have said in this thread for us to win between 9 to 11 games we will need Max or Nuss to take charge and for our O LINE TO STAY HEALTHY.


We returned 4 starters from last year’s team and most of them being upperclassmen or super seniors. They were completely healthy week 1. What’s the excuse for running 2 run plays against UCLA, a single draw, no screens, nothing outside the tackles and barely anything outside the guards? Where was any misdirection, motion, jet sweeps?
Posted by Kikicaca
1 Mile from the Atchafalaya
Member since Nov 2016
810 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 7:58 am to
quote:

Collectively the rant has been proven correct very very often. Ultimately the things that the rant complained about were the things that led to coaching changes in basketball x 2, baseball x 1 and football. The first thing the new coaching staffs did in every case was move in the direction the fanbase had been clamoring for for years.



Well let me give O a call he needs to consult "The Mighty Rant" on a daily basis. I sure "The Mighty Rant" was consulted in 2019 and is the reason we went 15-0 and won the NC. I am sure "The Mighty Rant" told Ed and Ensminger to invite Joe Burrow to come to LSU.

"The Mighty Rant" never wanted O, hated Ensminger thought Cylde Hellaire should be replaced by TDP and Emery. Yes let's all bow to the "The Mighty Rant".

Posted by Rosenblatt
Member since Apr 2019
6294 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 8:00 am to
Is he qualified to have a voice in offensive game planning? Based on the premise of this thread?

Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
78468 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 8:02 am to
quote:

I am sure "The Mighty Rant" told Ed and Ensminger to invite Joe Burrow to come to LSU.


Actually…they did. There were plenty of threads here clamoring to get him
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
41805 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 8:03 am to
quote:

What credentials does Ed have that make him qualified to be involved in offense or offensive game planning?

His credentials are that he's the Head Coach. The OP is a goofball, but he is dead right on this one. Any head coach, regardless if he's a defensive specialist, has to be involved in the offensive strategy. The offensive and defensive strategies cannot exist independently of each other.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
57370 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 8:04 am to
quote:

The Mighty Rant" never wanted O, hated Ensminger thought Cylde Hellaire should be replaced by TDP and Emery. Yes let's all bow to the "The Mighty Rant".
you are just making things up. Collectively was the key. And collectively it seems the rant was right about O. Also E. Hell O wont even refer to it as his offense

And no one wanted CEH to sit goofy
Posted by ibleedprplngld
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jan 2012
4387 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 8:04 am to
Man, gtfo of here with that bull shite. There are multiple posters on this board who are former collegiate players. You’re not the only one. And 99% of those dudes think the product on the field is trash. That LSU has talent up and down the roster but can’t seem to pull it together because of COACHING. Poor technique, bad scheme, failure to read and pick up pressure, and a host of other problems.

Also, I’m guessing you probably played for McNeese because they’re the only ones who think their team is any good, relative to past teams.
Posted by Kikicaca
1 Mile from the Atchafalaya
Member since Nov 2016
810 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 8:05 am to
quote:

What credentials does Ed have that make him qualified to be involved in offense or offensive game planning?

Based on your logic, only those who have been involved directly in the running of offense at the sec level or higher should be involved.


Stick with baseball. You actually think head coaches don't get involved in the gameplan with the offensive and defensive coordinators and position coaches before game day? Tell me you don't believe that.

If that were the case than LSU and ever other college football teams could save a lot of money because in your world they wouldn't need a head coach.

Baseball stick with baseball. BTW does the head baseball coach not get involved with the offense and defense issues?
Posted by jbraua
Oklahoma City, OK
Member since Oct 2007
6870 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 8:06 am to
quote:

Lastly 90% don't understand why we lost to UCLA. . . . Why you can and cannot run certain plays based on the personnel you have versus who you are playing. What the "fans" see versus what coaches see is light years apart.


Nick Saban would have destroyed UCLA with our current roster.
Posted by deaux
Member since Oct 2018
20267 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 8:06 am to
This is pathetic
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
38281 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 8:07 am to
The mighty rant wanted:

Modernized offense that utilized concepts and play calls that put athletes in space in unpredictable ways (from a defensive standpoint) that utilized aggressive play calling. Pretty sure that was the 2019 offense and honestly the 2020 offense but with a much less creative and capable running game.

When burrow was on the market the rant said go get him.

Most of the rant never wanted O because they feared we would be in the current position, unproven coordinators with a HC that is admittedly not good at ax’s and O’s.

Ensminger called offenses have scored a total of 7 points against Alabama in 3 games. I don’t hate Ensminger and I’m damn glad he’s a tiger and he stepped up for us throughout the years, but he’s not a great OC, he may not even be above average.

I never got the CEH hate and the calls for replacing them with TDP and Emery.

So out of your accusations, the rant is 4/5

Now some more things the rant wanted.

Not Bo Pelini
Not Scott Linehan

That makes 6/7
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram