- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chalk up a 'W' for prior infection immunity: Israeli study shows it 6X-13X more effective
Posted on 8/26/21 at 10:00 am to Ronaldo Burgundiaz
Posted on 8/26/21 at 10:00 am to Ronaldo Burgundiaz
From the website in bright red text:
Interesting if true (although it's not an argument against getting or requiring vaccines) along with the claim that a booster shot gave a boost to those with natural immunity. We'll have to wait for peer review to see if this goes the way of the fraudulent ivermectin "study."
quote:
Caution: Preprints are preliminary reports of work that have not been certified by peer review. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Interesting if true (although it's not an argument against getting or requiring vaccines) along with the claim that a booster shot gave a boost to those with natural immunity. We'll have to wait for peer review to see if this goes the way of the fraudulent ivermectin "study."
4
Posted on 8/26/21 at 10:02 am to BiggerBear
quote:
We'll have to wait for peer review
Peer review is worthless. It assumes peers are unbiased and competent in their fields, assumptions wholly unfounded in 2021.
This post was edited on 8/26/21 at 10:03 am
Posted on 8/26/21 at 10:05 am to BiggerBear
quote:It ABSOLUTELY is an argument against firing previously infected employees and hiring vaccinated employees.
(although it's not an argument against getting or requiring vaccines)
Posted on 8/26/21 at 10:19 am to BiggerBear
quote:Director of Genetics Institute in London weighs in on this preprint
We'll have to wait for peer review to see if this goes the way of the fraudulent ivermectin "study."
quote:
Prof Francois Balloux @BallouxFrancois 13h
This preprint is a bit of a bombshell.
The results point to natural infection affording longer-lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization due to the SARSCoV2 Delta variant than vaccine-induced immunity.
The results also point to one dose of BioNTech/Pfizer mRNA vaccine administrated post-infection providing marginally higher protection than immunity due to prior infection alone.
The study has a huge sample size and is the largest of its type to date. The analyses look competent to me. There are likely subtle biases in the data, but given the clearcut results, the patterns are in all likelihood genuine.
There have been previous results pointing in that direction. Of all Covid19 cases in July 2021, 99% had never been infected and 78% never vaccinated, and this despite far many more people having been vaccinated than infected by SARSCoV2 in the UK.
Posted on 8/27/21 at 7:10 am to BiggerBear
quote:
although it's not an argument against getting or requiring vaccines)
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News