Started By
Message

re: Not Enough Research of the Protection Levels of Natural Immunity of Infection

Posted on 8/16/21 at 12:12 pm to
Posted by RC
Member since Apr 2009
957 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 12:12 pm to
I think the problem is that there are likely a lot of false positive tests out there, so you can't really study the effectiveness of prior infection if you can't be sure who was really infected.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22391 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 12:15 pm to
Could you do more than 1 test to confirm? Just seems like the response is we think there is protection and chance of reinfection seems rare but we really don’t know how to confirm so just go and get the vaccine just to be sure.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56679 posts
Posted on 8/16/21 at 11:34 pm to
quote:

I think the problem is that there are likely a lot of false positive tests out there, so you can't really study the effectiveness of prior infection if you can't be sure who was really infected.



That's simply not true.

You have to do an active study though. You have to identify people who have had positive tests and who show an antibody response. Then you have to track them over time like you do with the vaccine studies.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram