Started By
Message

re: Sports Illustrated Swimsuit 2021: Megan Thee Stallion makes the cover.... (NSFW)

Posted on 7/19/21 at 8:08 pm to
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
43675 posts
Posted on 7/19/21 at 8:08 pm to
quote:

She's a large woman though and a woman that is 5'10 and thick like that picture doesn't weigh 145 pounds. They're easily over 170.


Can’t believe that guy is trying to argue that woman is 145 lbs. she is built like a rb with a huge arse and tits.
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
22301 posts
Posted on 7/19/21 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

Can’t believe that guy is trying to argue that woman is 145 lbs. she is built like a rb with a huge arse and tits.


I'm just the messenger, buddy. Her listed weight is 143-148. And the "built like a running back" quip is nonsense. She's built like a slim-waisted, big titty black chick.
This post was edited on 7/19/21 at 8:15 pm
Posted by highcotton2
Alabama
Member since Feb 2010
9442 posts
Posted on 7/19/21 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

This about to get weird for you. Prayers sent in advance


My point was even a dude who is in good shape pretending to be a woman can look better than an out of shape person pretending to be a model. 95% of people who have no idea who either person is would pick the first picture as being more deserving of a “swimsuit model”.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
44021 posts
Posted on 7/19/21 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

She's built like a slim-waisted, big titty black chick.


There's nothing slim waisted about the picture that you posted.
Posted by NorthTxLSU
Dallas, Tx
Member since Nov 2018
11101 posts
Posted on 7/19/21 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

She looks disgusting.


Posted by vol-boy
Dixie
Member since Feb 2012
1382 posts
Posted on 7/19/21 at 8:30 pm to
The race to the bottom continues.
Posted by JAG
Trinidad & Tobago
Member since Jun 2012
244 posts
Posted on 7/19/21 at 8:35 pm to
Not sure why all the downvotes. I would much look at a female than the tranny miss New Mexico. If I hit the stallion I would probably need a few days off to recover but I am in !!!
Posted by Arbengal
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2008
3019 posts
Posted on 7/19/21 at 9:00 pm to
I have seen logger head turtles that look a damn site better than that chunk. I can’t unsee that!
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
35808 posts
Posted on 7/19/21 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

I have seen logger head turtles that look a damn site better than that chunk. I can’t unsee that!


compare it to this...



Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
22301 posts
Posted on 7/19/21 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

There's nothing slim waisted about the picture that you posted.


Lol, her measurements are 36-26-38. That's not big at all. She has an hourglass figure.
Posted by Dan_LSU
Jacksonville, Florida
Member since Jul 2021
14 posts
Posted on 7/20/21 at 6:59 am to
Hell yeah. Good post. Looks like a hot woman in a swimsuit to me. If you're complaining about her, then why don't you show us a photo of your supermodel girlfriend?
Posted by johnnyrocket
Ghetto once known as Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2013
9790 posts
Posted on 7/20/21 at 7:01 am to
Sports Illustrated is not for men anymore and they are not advertising toward men.

They want it to be a feel good about yourself magazine toward women.

It not the 1970’s and 1989’s magazine that gives you a free football phone if you order today.
Posted by CatFisherman
Washington DC
Member since Jul 2021
25 posts
Posted on 7/20/21 at 11:41 am to
don't understand the problem here. she looks fine as hell to me.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
44021 posts
Posted on 7/20/21 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Lol, her measurements are 36-26-38. That's not big at all. She has an hourglass figure.


She also totally weighed 145 pounds in that picture you posted.
Posted by Zendog
Santa Barbara
Member since Feb 2019
4520 posts
Posted on 7/20/21 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

If you're complaining about her, then why don't you show us a photo of your supermodel girlfriend?


My supermodel girlfriend isn't plastered on the Sports Illustrated cover.
Posted by MSUDawg98
Ravens Flock
Member since Jan 2018
10034 posts
Posted on 7/20/21 at 2:11 pm to
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 7/20/21 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

I would much look at a female than the tranny miss New Mexico.


I mean...is that where we are in America in 2021 where you think those are the only two viable options?

For decades, SI's Swimsuit Edition was like a second Christmas for guys. It featured the very hottest women in the entire world, and they would essentially fight over who got to be on the cover. Scroll through this link, and except for the 2016 covers that featured Rhonda Rousey for no good reason and the heavy chick in the middle, they've mostly been incredible. And that's just the covers. As as connoisseur from all the way back to probably '79, I can assure what was inside was many times even better.

LINK

But...that was back when SI was actually trying to cater to their actual audience...male sports fans. Also, notice what's missing from the tops of those older magazines in favor of what's on these.



These covers, and even these magazines are not produced to cater to what's left of their audience. They are produced to "start conversations" and to "open eyes" and "speak truth."

So we've gone from having the world's hottest supermodels scantily clad in photos from all around the world, to an incredibly average looking tennis player, a girl who looks like a stripper from a shitty club outside of Baltimore, and a literal man in a bikini. My point is, back when things didn't suck for no good reason, we were not left having to conclude that, "well...at least it's an actual woman and not a guy!"
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 10Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram