- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sports Illustrated Swimsuit 2021: Megan Thee Stallion makes the cover.... (NSFW)
Posted on 7/19/21 at 8:08 pm to RB10
Posted on 7/19/21 at 8:08 pm to RB10
quote:
She's a large woman though and a woman that is 5'10 and thick like that picture doesn't weigh 145 pounds. They're easily over 170.
Can’t believe that guy is trying to argue that woman is 145 lbs. she is built like a rb with a huge arse and tits.
Posted on 7/19/21 at 8:13 pm to diat150
quote:
Can’t believe that guy is trying to argue that woman is 145 lbs. she is built like a rb with a huge arse and tits.
I'm just the messenger, buddy. Her listed weight is 143-148. And the "built like a running back" quip is nonsense. She's built like a slim-waisted, big titty black chick.
This post was edited on 7/19/21 at 8:15 pm
Posted on 7/19/21 at 8:16 pm to gadknot
quote:
This about to get weird for you. Prayers sent in advance
My point was even a dude who is in good shape pretending to be a woman can look better than an out of shape person pretending to be a model. 95% of people who have no idea who either person is would pick the first picture as being more deserving of a “swimsuit model”.
Posted on 7/19/21 at 8:18 pm to Saint Alfonzo
quote:
She's built like a slim-waisted, big titty black chick.
There's nothing slim waisted about the picture that you posted.
Posted on 7/19/21 at 8:22 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
She looks disgusting.
Posted on 7/19/21 at 8:30 pm to finchmeister08
The race to the bottom continues.
Posted on 7/19/21 at 8:35 pm to finchmeister08
Not sure why all the downvotes. I would much look at a female than the tranny miss New Mexico. If I hit the stallion I would probably need a few days off to recover but I am in !!!
Posted on 7/19/21 at 9:00 pm to finchmeister08
I have seen logger head turtles that look a damn site better than that chunk. I can’t unsee that!
Posted on 7/19/21 at 10:07 pm to Arbengal
quote:
I have seen logger head turtles that look a damn site better than that chunk. I can’t unsee that!
compare it to this...
Posted on 7/19/21 at 10:28 pm to RB10
quote:
There's nothing slim waisted about the picture that you posted.
Lol, her measurements are 36-26-38. That's not big at all. She has an hourglass figure.
Posted on 7/20/21 at 6:59 am to finchmeister08
Hell yeah. Good post. Looks like a hot woman in a swimsuit to me. If you're complaining about her, then why don't you show us a photo of your supermodel girlfriend?
Posted on 7/20/21 at 7:01 am to finchmeister08
Sports Illustrated is not for men anymore and they are not advertising toward men.
They want it to be a feel good about yourself magazine toward women.
It not the 1970’s and 1989’s magazine that gives you a free football phone if you order today.
They want it to be a feel good about yourself magazine toward women.
It not the 1970’s and 1989’s magazine that gives you a free football phone if you order today.
Posted on 7/20/21 at 11:41 am to finchmeister08
don't understand the problem here. she looks fine as hell to me.
Posted on 7/20/21 at 11:42 am to Saint Alfonzo
quote:
Lol, her measurements are 36-26-38. That's not big at all. She has an hourglass figure.
She also totally weighed 145 pounds in that picture you posted.
Posted on 7/20/21 at 12:07 pm to Dan_LSU
quote:
If you're complaining about her, then why don't you show us a photo of your supermodel girlfriend?
My supermodel girlfriend isn't plastered on the Sports Illustrated cover.
Posted on 7/20/21 at 2:32 pm to JAG
quote:
I would much look at a female than the tranny miss New Mexico.
I mean...is that where we are in America in 2021 where you think those are the only two viable options?
For decades, SI's Swimsuit Edition was like a second Christmas for guys. It featured the very hottest women in the entire world, and they would essentially fight over who got to be on the cover. Scroll through this link, and except for the 2016 covers that featured Rhonda Rousey for no good reason and the heavy chick in the middle, they've mostly been incredible. And that's just the covers. As as connoisseur from all the way back to probably '79, I can assure what was inside was many times even better.
LINK
But...that was back when SI was actually trying to cater to their actual audience...male sports fans. Also, notice what's missing from the tops of those older magazines in favor of what's on these.
These covers, and even these magazines are not produced to cater to what's left of their audience. They are produced to "start conversations" and to "open eyes" and "speak truth."
So we've gone from having the world's hottest supermodels scantily clad in photos from all around the world, to an incredibly average looking tennis player, a girl who looks like a stripper from a shitty club outside of Baltimore, and a literal man in a bikini. My point is, back when things didn't suck for no good reason, we were not left having to conclude that, "well...at least it's an actual woman and not a guy!"
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News