- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Company I work for is going public
Posted on 4/22/21 at 10:23 am
Posted on 4/22/21 at 10:23 am
Buying company isn't a competitor. They're adding our service to their line of business. I'm in development. Been with the company for 15 years and is the only professional business I've worked for.
Anyone have any input on what to expect? Doesn't sound like there will be layoffs but who knows.
Has anyone gone through this transition with their company and what was your experience like?
Anyone have any input on what to expect? Doesn't sound like there will be layoffs but who knows.
Has anyone gone through this transition with their company and what was your experience like?
Posted on 4/22/21 at 10:33 am to WhiskeyThrottle
IMO, going that much bigger isn't for the best interest of the employee...you may have access to better benefits, but corporate BS is not for me.
Posted on 4/22/21 at 10:40 am to WhiskeyThrottle
Are you saying that the company that you work for, a private company, is being acquired by a publicly traded company?
Since they are adding a service line and you guys are not a competitor, it seems that layoffs might not be on the immediate horizon. Some streamlining does take place. Since they have to show that acquisitions are accretive, they will take a look at what departments are critical to keep.
What is the name of the company that is doing the buying?
Since they are adding a service line and you guys are not a competitor, it seems that layoffs might not be on the immediate horizon. Some streamlining does take place. Since they have to show that acquisitions are accretive, they will take a look at what departments are critical to keep.
What is the name of the company that is doing the buying?
Posted on 4/22/21 at 10:40 am to SaDaTayMoses
I would wager there are some people that will be losing their jobs due to redundancies. Do you have any equity in your company?
I work for a company that's a "startup" (we're 6 years in), and received equity when I signed on...so us going public at some point would be a payday for me.
I work for a company that's a "startup" (we're 6 years in), and received equity when I signed on...so us going public at some point would be a payday for me.
Posted on 4/22/21 at 10:56 am to WhiskeyThrottle
Typically the lowest and absolute highest employees are safe, but those in middle management are often in for a rude awakening.
Posted on 4/22/21 at 11:19 am to WhiskeyThrottle
So, yall do something that the parent company doesnt do? If so, you may be completely ignored for some time.
If they are really big they may not even know what to do with you for a while. Hope for better benefits, a retention bonus or the like to make the first bit of time better for you......also, if you like your job and what you do dont be a thundercloud when the inevitable changes occur. Without being a suck up kiss arse just have a good attitude.
If they are really big they may not even know what to do with you for a while. Hope for better benefits, a retention bonus or the like to make the first bit of time better for you......also, if you like your job and what you do dont be a thundercloud when the inevitable changes occur. Without being a suck up kiss arse just have a good attitude.
Posted on 4/22/21 at 11:23 am to WhiskeyThrottle
There wont be many changes. Any changes will be for the better. Heard it before. Hopefully you'll be OK.
Posted on 4/22/21 at 11:41 am to WhiskeyThrottle
You have equity as part of your comp package?
Posted on 4/22/21 at 11:42 am to WhiskeyThrottle
Layoffs will happen. There’s always some fat to be taken off
Posted on 4/22/21 at 11:42 am to slackster
quote:
those in middle management are often in for a rude awakening.
If you have to meet with the Bobs it's time to get nervous.
Posted on 4/22/21 at 12:19 pm to WhiskeyThrottle
If your area isn’t something that the acquiring company already does, but it’s in an area where they intend to grow, they you may have hit the jackpot. Also, if your area is adjacent to, upstream or downstream of their current value chain, you may also be in a good place.
If you’re in an area where they don’t currently have a product/service and isn’t adjacent, up/downstream of their current business portfolio, then who really knows unless they’ve stated intentions (which apparently they haven’t).
I’ve been through many M&A processes, including those that were in deep discussion that never came to fruition, and the reductions in force or redundancies (projected or actually realized) will almost always be in Acct/Finance, HR, IT, Legal, Admin, Sales/Marketing and anywhere where the 2 companies have overlapping, identical or substantially similar businesses.
The finance group or bankers putting the deal together will focus on these cost-savings synergies heavily since those will drop right to earnings (once realized) and then stock price will rise (theoretically) by their P/E.
The CEO and lead Management team of the acquiring company will be more focused on strategy, customers, eng/operations/product, and revenue synergies.
If you can get deeper intel on their future strategy, then you may be able to position yourself in a great way.
I hope that helps.
If you’re in an area where they don’t currently have a product/service and isn’t adjacent, up/downstream of their current business portfolio, then who really knows unless they’ve stated intentions (which apparently they haven’t).
I’ve been through many M&A processes, including those that were in deep discussion that never came to fruition, and the reductions in force or redundancies (projected or actually realized) will almost always be in Acct/Finance, HR, IT, Legal, Admin, Sales/Marketing and anywhere where the 2 companies have overlapping, identical or substantially similar businesses.
The finance group or bankers putting the deal together will focus on these cost-savings synergies heavily since those will drop right to earnings (once realized) and then stock price will rise (theoretically) by their P/E.
The CEO and lead Management team of the acquiring company will be more focused on strategy, customers, eng/operations/product, and revenue synergies.
If you can get deeper intel on their future strategy, then you may be able to position yourself in a great way.
I hope that helps.
Posted on 4/22/21 at 12:42 pm to WhiskeyThrottle
I've been through this twice, and have been retained both times, but eventually left. Working for a large public company usually means better benefits, or lower costs of insurance etc, but at the cost of all of the other "smaller" things you might enjoy. Within the first 6 months with the first company, crawfish boils, BBQs, Christmas parties were all cancelled. A few months and then our bonuses changed from whatever the owners felt like, to a percentage of our base pay, which happened to be substantially lower than what we made before. Thats when I left. Now company vehicles all have trackers and cant be used for anything personal, and all company laptops have software installed to monitor "efficiency".
Posted on 4/22/21 at 1:14 pm to Chucktown_Badger
No equity in the company. Our previous valuation was about $700M about 5 years ago and this sale was between $900M and $1B. I started in the call center 15 years ago when I was 19 or 20 and apparently call center people don't get the option of owning any part of the company. Lol.
I'm in IT/Development now. The company currently doesn't have the same vertical we are in. They have related services but not the same services my company offers. Their IT staff is about 400 people and we are about 80. Logically thinking, I don't think they could lay off at least my position and 90% of our IT staff and expect to have any way to support the business.
I'm not particularly pessimistic at all. In some ways relieved. We have gone through a few Private Equity transitions in my time here and every time a sell gets brought up, it's a "hold your breath and hope it isn't a competitor" type of situation. Private equities seem to be vampires to businesses as far as the employees are concerned. The employees are always an expense to them that they try to suck some juice from. Having a new owner seems like they may actually care about the employees a little more since they're not particularly looking to bounce the company around like a ping pong ball.
Based on reading the responses, not much as far as work dynamic will change. Maybe better or different benefits and fringe stuff but work expectations will change small and slowly hopefully. I'm not opposed to change at all as long as I still have solid employment I'll be happy.
I'm in IT/Development now. The company currently doesn't have the same vertical we are in. They have related services but not the same services my company offers. Their IT staff is about 400 people and we are about 80. Logically thinking, I don't think they could lay off at least my position and 90% of our IT staff and expect to have any way to support the business.
I'm not particularly pessimistic at all. In some ways relieved. We have gone through a few Private Equity transitions in my time here and every time a sell gets brought up, it's a "hold your breath and hope it isn't a competitor" type of situation. Private equities seem to be vampires to businesses as far as the employees are concerned. The employees are always an expense to them that they try to suck some juice from. Having a new owner seems like they may actually care about the employees a little more since they're not particularly looking to bounce the company around like a ping pong ball.
Based on reading the responses, not much as far as work dynamic will change. Maybe better or different benefits and fringe stuff but work expectations will change small and slowly hopefully. I'm not opposed to change at all as long as I still have solid employment I'll be happy.
Posted on 4/22/21 at 1:18 pm to Atttaboy
quote:
I’ve been through many M&A processes, including those that were in deep discussion that never came to fruition, and the reductions in force or redundancies (projected or actually realized) will almost always be in Acct/Finance, HR, IT, Legal, Admin, Sales/Marketing and anywhere where the 2 companies have overlapping, identical or substantially similar businesses.
I was thinking HR, Legal, Marketing and some accountants are where you could reduce the redundancy. Maybe some IT but we are a tech firm and the IT resources we have now are necessary to maintain the infrastructure. I could be proven wrong but if that's the case, it is what it is.
Posted on 4/22/21 at 1:30 pm to WhiskeyThrottle
My reference to IT was more about corporate support and networking for businesses that don’t have an IT focus.
You nailed it on Private Equity and flips to them - they are all about gaining efficiencies which means reductions in force and increasing duties on remaining staff.
Going public may be a good thing compared to them.
You nailed it on Private Equity and flips to them - they are all about gaining efficiencies which means reductions in force and increasing duties on remaining staff.
Going public may be a good thing compared to them.
Posted on 4/22/21 at 1:35 pm to WhiskeyThrottle
One other thing to note since you’re in an IT-centric development position, even if they don’t have an overlapping business - if they currently outsource a decent percentage of their IT development to a low-wage market like India, SE Asia or Eastern Europe, then that could be concerning, as they may want to increase their intended margins with labor arbitrage.
Posted on 4/22/21 at 2:01 pm to WhiskeyThrottle
say hi to corporate rules and HR! 

Posted on 4/22/21 at 2:12 pm to Atttaboy
I wouldn't mark offshoring off the list of possibilities, but I think that writing would be on the wall WELL in advance. We have mounds of code that would take a huge team of tech people to wrap themselves in before they could provide the proper support.
It certainly seems like we will maintain the status quo for the short term then start working the changes in slowly at first. If I'm guessing.
It certainly seems like we will maintain the status quo for the short term then start working the changes in slowly at first. If I'm guessing.
This post was edited on 4/22/21 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 4/22/21 at 2:16 pm to WhiskeyThrottle
Is there a chance to get in on the ipo?
If every upper and middle manager is refinancing the house to buy the early ipo,
If so I’d throw a lot in it and sell most right away.
If every upper and middle manager is refinancing the house to buy the early ipo,
If so I’d throw a lot in it and sell most right away.
Back to top
