- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Mathematician- election numbers could not have occurred naturally
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:01 pm
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:01 pm
Rumble
All the stars in the universe...allllll the atoms combined and still- NOPE.
All the stars in the universe...allllll the atoms combined and still- NOPE.
This post was edited on 1/28/21 at 10:03 pm
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:05 pm to RedShift
quote:Hence, troops stationed in DC.
They know they're full of shite
We know they're full of shite
They know WE know they're full of shite
... and they're daring you to do something meaningful about it.
Next?
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:07 pm to RedShift
Just ANOTHER reminder for the party of science...
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:10 pm to prplngldtigr
I don't need math.
Ain't no way Biden won. No way.
Ain't no way Biden won. No way.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:11 pm to RedShift
quote:
They know they're full of shite
We know they're full of shite
They know WE know they're full of shite
Hence 7000 troops remain guarding the chicken s**t crooks
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:12 pm to prplngldtigr
They are trying to impeach trump because they know they can only suppress the facts of the fraud for so long.
It took 4 years for the truth about the Russia hoax to come out. It will take just as long for the truth of the election fraud to come out and they don’t want trump being able to run again when it does.
It took 4 years for the truth about the Russia hoax to come out. It will take just as long for the truth of the election fraud to come out and they don’t want trump being able to run again when it does.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:12 pm to prplngldtigr
And nothing will be done.
Unless somebody in power can lead a real movement, I'm just over here twiddling my thumbs and mourning the boating accident loss of enough gear to outfit myself and 4 or 5 others.
Unless somebody in power can lead a real movement, I'm just over here twiddling my thumbs and mourning the boating accident loss of enough gear to outfit myself and 4 or 5 others.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:13 pm to prplngldtigr
One in a quadrillion shot
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:15 pm to HubbaBubba
It’s so self evident, like Joe’s dementia.
And yet we still act polite & pretend we see nothing.
And yet we still act polite & pretend we see nothing.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:23 pm to prplngldtigr
Here's what I want to know. Why were we not aware of all of this frickery with the machines till after the election? Trump's team should have known these machines were bunk to begin with, and been leading a unified front to put a stop to them 3 or 4 years ago.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:24 pm to prplngldtigr
No shite...this could change everything.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:29 pm to prplngldtigr
Until someone in power cares, nothing will be done.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:31 pm to Chrome
So why are they writing this up in an academic journal? I mean I hope this is true but it has to be shown to the public at large.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:37 pm to prplngldtigr
It’s obvious. Now you wait until they piss off enough people. Then nothing will happen, because we’ll still have easy food, cheap entertainment, and a basic means of not giving a frick.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:42 pm to burger bearcat
quote:I think you answered your own question.
Here's what I want to know. Why were we not aware of all of this frickery with the machines till after the election? Trump's team should have known these machines were bunk to begin with, and been leading a unified front to put a stop to them 3 or 4 years ago.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:42 pm to RedShift
quote:
of course not ... and?
They know they're full of shite
We know they're full of shite
They know WE know they're full of shite
... and they're daring you to do something meaningful about it.
Next?
This^^^ is truly where we are today. The NWO Globalists and Dim Marxists realize they no longer need to hide their corruption.....to say they’re hyper emboldened is an understatement.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:45 pm to burger bearcat
quote:
Here's what I want to know. Why were we not aware of all of this frickery with the machines till after the election? Trump's team should have known these machines were bunk to begin with, and been leading a unified front to put a stop to them 3 or 4 years ago.
Sadly, the number of people who occupy the Swamp that cared about a fair and legitimate election was probably less than a dozen people.....that’s not enough to stop the election shenanigans.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:49 pm to Huey Lewis
quote:
boating accident loss of enough gear to outfit myself and 4 or 5 others.
Slacker.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:57 pm to prplngldtigr
DEBUNKED
Reuters sought comment from experts regarding these claims.
Reuters
Reuters sought comment from experts regarding these claims.
quote:
Theodore P. Hill, Professor Emeritus of Mathematics at Georgia Tech, Atlanta, cautioned that regardless of the distribution uncovered, the application of Benford’s Law would not provide definitive evidence that fraud took place.
“First, I’d like to stress that Benford’s Law can NOT be used to “prove fraud”,” he told Reuters by email. “It is only a Red Flag test, that can raise doubts. E.g., the IRS has been using it for decades to ferret out fraudsters, but only by identifying suspicious entries, at which time they put the auditors to work on the hard evidence. Whether or not a dataset follows BL proves nothing.”
Walter Mebane, Professor at the Department of Political Science and Department of Statistics at the University of Michigan (here) authored a December 2006 article (here) around the application of Benford’s Law to the US presidential election results.
On Nov. 9, 2020, in response to “several queries” Mebane published a paper called “Inappropriate Applications of Benford’s Law Regularities to Some Data from the 2020 Presidential Election in the United States” (here). His paper says, “The displays shown at those sources using the first digits of precinct vote counts data from Fulton County, GA, Allegheny County, PA, Milwaukee, WI, and Chicago, IL, say nothing about possible frauds” before examining the reasons behind this statement.
“It is widely understood that the first digits of precinct vote counts are not useful for trying to diagnose election frauds,” he writes.
Reuters
Posted on 1/28/21 at 10:59 pm to HeadSlash
quote:Yea. It's a one in a quadrillion shot.
One in a quadrillion shot
But ONLY IF you assume that the votes after 2:00 a.m. on 11/4 (the mail in vote) came in at roughly the same R/D ratio as the votes before 2:00 a.m. ( the in-person vote) did that day.
Do you believe that? Of course not.
That's what Cicchetti assumed in his ridiculous calculation.
Read his declaration. It's right there in black and white.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News