Started By
Message

re: Anyone who is for increased minimum wage tell me why we shouldn't jump straight to $100/hr

Posted on 1/18/21 at 11:27 am to
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
67503 posts
Posted on 1/18/21 at 11:27 am to
Dems: everyone who works full time should get a living wage. 31 K assuming they work 40 hours a week 52 weeks a year.

Conservatives who think they’re smart: why shouldn’t they make 208k a year HUH?!?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111797 posts
Posted on 1/18/21 at 11:29 am to
Dems in 4 years: how can people survive on $31k/yr? Have you tried to support a family of 10 on $31k? why do you hate the poor?
Posted by Pintail
Member since Nov 2011
10708 posts
Posted on 1/18/21 at 11:32 am to
quote:

Conservatives who think they’re smart: why shouldn’t they make 208k a year HUH?!?


Okay then can you answer the question in the OP?

quote:

why we shouldn't jump straight to $100/hr


Please bless us with your knowledge.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 1/18/21 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Dems: everyone who works full time should get a living wage. 31 K assuming they work 40 hours a week 52 weeks a year.

Conservatives who think they’re smart: why shouldn’t they make 208k a year HUH?!?


Seems to me, that if I currently make 796% more than minimum wage, if they raise minimum wage, they have to raise my pay as well, right? To keep the proportions and all that. It's only fair.
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
67051 posts
Posted on 1/18/21 at 11:53 am to
lol, look at this moron proving the OPs point for him.
Posted by Ebridg3
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Sep 2016
1640 posts
Posted on 1/18/21 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

Dems: everyone who works full time should get a living wage. 31 K assuming they work 40 hours a week 52 weeks a year.


LOL!

Dems: Job pay should be guaranteed based on the hours worked per week, not the job itself or merit.

So you're saying that minimum wage should only be offered to fulltime employees and under the assumption that they do not get overtime?

Why not just give them a 31.2k a year salary with strict attendance rules?

There's no logic at all in this. The unemployment rate alone would sky rocket, much less the loss of benefits and hours.

quote:

everyone who works full time should get a living wage.


living wage or live alone wage?

Affording to live alone and own property etc is not a right, it's a privilege. You can live on far, FAR less than 31k a year if you're humble and disciplined.
This post was edited on 1/18/21 at 8:15 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram