- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: UPDATE IN OP: Giuliani WILL NOT Defend Impeachment:
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:28 am to JudgeHolden
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:28 am to JudgeHolden
Why did you do that?
2
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:29 am to DocHollidayMS
quote:
That is- if the impeachment was based on truth to begin with.
The House impeached while he was in office. That’s legal by anybody’s standard.
The Senate will try him after he leaves. That’s in question.
quote:
And that it is legitimate is debated by constitutional scholars.
There is debate. But my vague recollection is that there is historical precedent.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:31 am to SDVTiger
On January 20, the Senate will seat 9Senators. 50 Republicans and 49 Democrats......Now tell me, with the Whore Harris seat vacant, Who exactly is the biggest fool? The House Clown Show attempting to force a trail or the Democrats thinking they have a chance?
McConnell doesn't have the votes to convict and he knows it.
McConnell doesn't have the votes to convict and he knows it.
This post was edited on 1/17/21 at 8:59 am
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:31 am to NIH
quote:
Why did you do that?
I knew the most about that candidate, and I liked what I saw.
I disliked Trump and Biden. Why throw it away on some third party candidate with whom I also disagree.
I voted for the person most aligned with my views. Me.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:31 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
The House impeached while he was in office.
What evidence did the House present?
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:31 am to NIH
quote:
Why did you do that?
He didn’t, of course.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:31 am to the808bass
quote:
What evidence did the House present?
The Constitution does not require it in the House.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:34 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
The Constitution does not require it in the House.
I’m aware. It shows the absolute farce that it is.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:34 am to arseinclarse
quote:
quote:
Jonathan
???
That quote is from Alan Dershowitz
He doesn’t want to represent trump bc he believes the trial will be nothing short of political theater.
He’s correct.
Sorry. I got confused. CajunAngelle said that Turley holds the same view.
That would surprise me. I respect Jonathan. I don’t think much of Dershowitz.
If Turkey said it, that has weight. Dershowitz carries only slightly more than Rudy.
This post was edited on 1/17/21 at 8:36 am
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:37 am to JudgeHolden
Why did you dislike Biden?
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:38 am to NIH
quote:
Why did you dislike Biden?
This would be for the eleventy-eleventh time, baw.
Ain’t nobody got time for that.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:39 am to JudgeHolden
If this goes to trial in the Senate I hope they can drag it out for months.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:40 am to JudgeHolden
Just asking questions.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:40 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
But my vague recollection is that there is historical precedent.
There is absolutely no historical precedent for putting a President on trial in the Senate after leaving office.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:42 am to JudgeHolden
but I thought you lying mother frickers said he was getting stiffed on fees
Why don't you assholes get your story straight before posting?
Why don't you assholes get your story straight before posting?
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:43 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
Giuliani to Defend Impeachment Trial for Trump
quote:
part of the president’s defense team
quote:
part
quote:
team
And President is capitalized, you commie.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:46 am to roadGator
quote:
And President is capitalized
You are correct. Will edit.
ETA. Went back and looked. That’s ABC, not me!
This post was edited on 1/17/21 at 8:48 am
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:49 am to gthog61
quote:
but I thought you lying mother frickers said he was getting stiffed on fees
So what’s he working for then? Think hard.
Plus, some of the very few left in the White House are apparently denying he’s hired.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:50 am to RollTide1987
quote:
There is absolutely no historical precedent for putting a President on trial in the Senate after leaving office.
Presidents aren’t the only ones impeached, baw. And the rules would be the same, President or no.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 8:51 am to the808bass
quote:
Why does impeachment and conviction of a President bar him from future office?
Senate needs 2/3 majority to convict him.
If impeached and convicted, they have the option to vote to ban him from public office. The ban would only require a simple majority.
They can convict him without banning him. But the whole point of this exercise is to ban him. Don't see them getting 17 republican senators to flip for the conviction though.
This post was edited on 1/17/21 at 8:57 am
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News