Started By
Message

re: RPO rate by QB

Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:19 pm to
Posted by P bean
br
Member since Dec 2006
4083 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

We ran zone read Saturday night. There was even a fumble from that “mesh point” as your link describes.


Secstatcat.com says youre WRONG.

Bwhahhahaa
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
93960 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:24 pm to
There are 3 zone read plays on the first drive alone from the link you provided.

Posted by GeauxHouston
Midland, Texas
Member since Nov 2013
4514 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:29 pm to
An RPO can be a read option... teams run it all the time. You run read option off the end, then the qb can either run or pitch it out to a screen on the edge.
Posted by P bean
br
Member since Dec 2006
4083 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:33 pm to
LOL.

Tiger lunatic. Doesnt even know whats being argued.

Uh, we are not arguing whether we called zone reads.

We are arguing whether our QB runs were from RPO’s which made folks flip their shite. Said it was all zone reads.

I said what the WR’s are doing determines whether it was RPO or not. Simple.

Secstatcat.com confirms that these wb runs were RPO’s.

Not one is listed as a qb run zone read.

LINK

This post was edited on 10/26/20 at 7:34 pm
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
93960 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:38 pm to
I mean the guy said we ran the zone read and you told him that he was wrong.
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
14023 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

Secstatcat.com says youre WRONG. Bwhahhahaa


Anyone watching the game that knows anything about football knows I’m right. Even the commentators talked about the exchange and how Finley needs to be more decisive so the RB knows whether he gets it or it’s a keeper.
Posted by P bean
br
Member since Dec 2006
4083 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:48 pm to
quote:


Message
RPO rate by QB by TigerLunatik
I mean the guy said we ran the zone read and you told him that he was wrong.



WRONG.

He said the qb runs that are listed as RPO’s by secstatcat.com were zone reads. They were not.

Thats why theyre listed as qb RPO runs.

We ran two qb RPO runs with Max Johnson also. 6 total qb runs from the RPO.

But this asswipe is saying they were zone reads.

Now why dont you see if you can find a play where the qb ran it and it was a zone read play? Just an FYI we didnt.
This post was edited on 10/26/20 at 7:49 pm
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
93960 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

I mean the guy said we ran the zone read and you told him that he was wrong.


WRONG.



Care to change your bullshite story, sir?
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
14023 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

P bean


Let me ask you this. In an NFL game, can a player line up at TE wearing #22?
Posted by P bean
br
Member since Dec 2006
4083 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

Care to change your bullshite story, sir?



Care to simply read the thread moron???

Lol again, this debate has been about what playset were in when the QB ran the ball.

fricking imbecile dude. Hahahahah
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
93960 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

Let me ask you this. In an NFL game, can a player line up at TE wearing #22?

Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
93960 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

Care to simply read the thread moron???

I can and I even posted evidence of exactly what you said. I'm not gonna try to interpret it. shite, on the previous page you said a QB run was a handoff. How am I supposed to decipher what you really mean?
Posted by ibleedprplngld
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jan 2012
4323 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 8:46 pm to
We are definitely agreeing. It is a really fun concept to tinker with and find different ways to attack a defense.

Just most ranters don’t understand the concept so they see a young QB execute it and think he’s out preforming a veteran that is going through full professions with 4/5 options and 4/5 reads before pulling the trigger. It’s kind of funny really. All because some ESPN blow hard, who probably hadn’t watched much LSU football, makes up a QB controversy.
This post was edited on 10/26/20 at 9:23 pm
Posted by CottonWasKing
4,8,15,16,23,42
Member since Jun 2011
28758 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

This is one of the plays you think is an RPO run by Finley






That’s so obviously a qb power too. It’s not an option at all.

Man I’ve gotta give it to Slinger. That motherfricker is pulling guards and tackles on RPOs now fricking genius
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279536 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 9:08 pm to
This is

quote:

Drive #1, snap #7, 1st quarter, 1st & 10, RPO draw



Again, very clearly a draw play from the onset & the way Hines seals down on the tackle to create the running lane for Finley.

WRs run the DBs off

OTs allow the ends to get upfield





Now do they go to the line with 2 plays? Possibly. The whole offense looks to the sideline pre snap. That does not make it an RPO.

But it is very clearly set up to be a QB draw.
Posted by misey94
Hernando, MS
Member since Jan 2007
23764 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 9:19 pm to
quote:

fricking imbecile dude. Hahahahah


I think we finally found the bottom of tRant. Congrats on outing yourself as the dumbest motherfricker in a barrel full of stupid. Damn. Just damn.
Posted by ibleedprplngld
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jan 2012
4323 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 9:29 pm to
They were definitely not RPOs and they weren’t read options. They were designed QB draws. The tell tail sign is the runs went inside or the same direction as the RB. The PA to the RB is just intended to get the defense flowing one direction in hopes a linebacker gets hung up in traffic. There was no pass option. Receivers running routes does not always equal a pass option. In fact, particularly if the run is inside, they’ll run routes in hopes of pulling the safety out of the play.
This post was edited on 10/26/20 at 9:30 pm
Posted by P bean
br
Member since Dec 2006
4083 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 9:29 pm to
Bu the way LEarl. Snap 24 drive 2 IS a RPO as the site indicates, not a zone read. Bwgahahahahah.

Its a qb RPO as is indicated on secstatcat.com.


Way to screen shot half the screen. LOL.

Marshall clearly ran a route on the play. He was the hot route/pop pass on this QB run RPO. He sprints out takes a jab step and turns inside, for a skinny post.

17 was mcmath, and he just ran a lazy as 9 route. He knows he isnt getting the rock.



Lol at the stupidity of you assholes.


We literally have a website that saya what play was run on the QB runs, and you IDIOTS STILL are arguing.


HILARIOUS.
This post was edited on 10/26/20 at 9:35 pm
Posted by P bean
br
Member since Dec 2006
4083 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 9:34 pm to
Your screenshots are complete garbage as is your analysis.

Drive 1 snap 7 - Marshall runs a out route the flats while Mcmath runs a 9 route.

Meaning it was a qb run RPO as secstatcat.com says.



Youre an IDIOT.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!
Going back to watch MNF now morons!

Bye bye
This post was edited on 10/26/20 at 9:36 pm
Posted by P bean
br
Member since Dec 2006
4083 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

I think we finally found the bottom of tRant. Congrats on outing yourself as the dumbest motherfricker in a barrel full of stupid. Damn. Just damn.


You twerps can agree with each other all you want. Doesnt mean that we werent clearly running QB Run RPO’s on those QB runs, not matter HOW MUCH you want to CRY about it.

fricking earl is over here screen shotting, trying to say the WR’s werent running pass route these qb runs, despite the fact that they were OBVIOUSLY running pass routes!!!

first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram