re: Trump lost Pennsylvania Monday

quote:

---

It's been stated they have to be post-dated by Nov 3rd.

---

No, they don't.

The Court stated that ballots lacking a clear postmark could be counted unless there was evidence that they were mailed after the polls closed.

The Court puts the onus on the Republicans to PROVE that the ballots were sent after Tuesday. How in the ever living f*ck is anyone going to prove that the ballots were mailed after Tuesday? The Democrats merely need to get a few "friendly" postal clerk to work a little overtime on Wednesday and Thursday nights to push as many ballots as they need to win and just not put any postal markings on those ballots. Then, those same postal clerks can basically hand deliver those ballots on Friday and there isn't a damn thing the Republicans can do about it as there is absof*ckinglutely no way they can PROVE that they weren't sent after Tuesday.

And don't think for one f*cking second that the Ed Rendell and the Dims don't already have this operation in place and ready to go.


ETA: In every other f*cking situation, it is the burden of the person who sends in a document to prove that they sent it in on time. For tax purposes, you better have a f*cking postmark on April 15th (or whatever the due date is) if your return comes in after the due date. If the post office f*cks it up, guess what -- YOU'RE F*CKED. You will be fined for filing a late return. This is pretty much the rule across all areas of the law.

Here, the Court not only changed the f*cking law, they also change the postmark rule. Imagine if the IRS had to prove that you didn't send the return or payment by the due date. It would render late filing penalties completely f*cking irrelevant.

F*CK JOHN ROBERTS!