Started By
Message

re: A fact worth remembering: Those who don't believe in God argue against absolutes

Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:07 am to
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:07 am to
quote:

I am not a believer. Yet, I have a very firm grasp on right and wrong and care about others
i'm pretty sure you don't and i'm pretty sure i can prove it. it's more likely you subscribe to some form of utilitarianism or pragmatism or evolutionary ethics all of which are mildly interesting but not sufficient for a moral worldview

quote:

I do not understand the painting with such a broad brush
normally i would agree but in the case of morals, he was actually right even if he went about it in a crude manner
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Vote for Trump in 2020


May I? Are you completely sure?

I'd rally hate it if I stained your side with my evilness...
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
432331 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:07 am to
quote:

One is rational (that doesn't necessarily mean correct) and one isn't; I'd say that's a difference.

i'm assuming you're saying the religious process is the rational one?
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
12376 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:07 am to
quote:

What exactly are these wealthy atheist western individuals supposed to do about a protracted and domestic conflict in a nation on the other side of the world?


Send “thoughts and prayers” like good Christians
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:08 am to
quote:

So the God you were taught of is obviously the only rational, objective basis for morals
yes. definitively
Posted by TacoNash
Member since Mar 2020
715 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:08 am to
quote:

Again, you can't call it progress if there's no objective goal.


My goal as a non believer is to live a "good" life and to that make a meaningful impact on other and this earth.

I would argue I do have an objective goal
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
42423 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:08 am to
quote:

So the God you were taught of is obviously the only rational, objective basis for morals.
The Biblical God is the only that provides the necessary preconditions for intelligibility for moral reasoning, yes.
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
12376 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:11 am to
quote:


The Biblical God is the only that provides the necessary preconditions for intelligibility for moral reasoning, yes.



You believe the earth is only 6,000 years old. Your opinions are invalid.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
23164 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:11 am to
quote:

i'm assuming you're saying the religious process is the rational one?


I didn't mention a religious process. I'm saying that if you believe in a supernatural source for objective morality then it's rational to believe in objective morality. Absent that belief in a source, it's not rational to believe in an objective morality that you can progress towards. You can progress towards your own ideals, but they're your personal opinion.
Posted by auburn32
Auburn
Member since Dec 2009
2184 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:11 am to
quote:

250 years ago, many heartfelt God fearing Christians owned slaves. They didn't consider themselves morally wrong owning salves. Now, I'd argue that all Christians probably say owning slaves is morally wrong.

So, if morality isn't a social construct and comes from God, why are these two takes so different? Were God's teachings about morality different back then?


It seems like the people who promote the OP as correct just conveniently didn't answer my earlier post.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
29949 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:11 am to
quote:

but not sufficient for a moral worldview


According to you. What a nonsense statement The arrogance that must come with believing that your belief system is the only way to establish morality.

This post was edited on 10/5/20 at 10:13 am
Posted by Harry Rex Vonner
American southerner
Member since Nov 2013
37743 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Evidence that they don’t? What does “giving a shite” look like and how is it impactful in any way for irrelevant people to “give a shite”?



Simple. Evidenced by their complete silence on social media, since their virtue signaling about all the wrong stances, instead, is deafening.


It's telling that you're butthurt about, obviously your people, not giving a shite about innocent people being starved to death


Neocons are war mongers. Leftists are even worse warmongers.


Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:12 am to
quote:

so you're saying people who don't believe in a deity have no morals?
it's more accurate to say that there is no basis for any moral decision outside of a transcendent moral anchor. it's crazy to me, absolutely mystifying that people don't know this. it goes to show how misled and warped knowledge of morality has become due to the liberal education system.

i have to hand it to the libs. they set out to mislead everyone and they were very, very effective. most people in the west are lost when it comes to morals
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
29949 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Evidenced by their complete silence on social media, since their virtue signaling about all the wrong stances, instead, is deafening.


Total generic nonsense
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
23164 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:13 am to
quote:

My goal as a non believer is to live a "good" life and to that make a meaningful impact on other and this earth.

I would argue I do have an objective goal


Whose definition of "good"? Muslims who throw gays off of buildings believe they're doing good. You have a goal, it's just not objective.
Posted by FieldEngineer
Member since Jan 2015
2222 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:13 am to
quote:

Those who don't believe in God

quote:

They don't believe in right and wrong.


Just chiming in to say this is a load of crap.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
29949 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:14 am to
quote:

it's more accurate to say that there is no basis for any moral decision outside of a transcendent moral anchor. it's crazy to me, absolutely mystifying that people don't know this.


That would be because it’s not some universal truth. It’s what you believe because it’s what your religion has taught you.

There is no “proving” that people cannot have a moral anchor outside of believing in a higher power or creator. That’s simply what YOU believe.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:15 am to
quote:

You believe the earth is only 6,000 years old. Your opinions are invalid.


Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:15 am to
quote:

So which God is the right one?
oh boy. here we go. someone who learned about religion from the back of a cracker jack box

how do you want to approach this? do you want to talk about specific attempts at "god" or do you want to talk theism (monotheism, henotheism, pantheism, panentheism, polytheism)?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
432331 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:15 am to
quote:

it's more accurate to say that there is no basis for any moral decision outside of a transcendent moral anchor.

see even this is debatable, at least for humans living in society

we have been doing a trial and error for 12000 years and using the disruptions in society as a basis for developing morality

again, that is why morality was magically so similar across the world with many different "transcendent moral anchors"
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 24
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 24Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram