Started By
Message

re: Most Likely Star to get traded

Posted on 8/30/20 at 9:28 pm to
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
27454 posts
Posted on 8/30/20 at 9:28 pm to
I'd take cj McCollum for jrue and whatever else
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
27454 posts
Posted on 8/30/20 at 9:30 pm to
I agree that they need a true 1
We need an alpha 1 guard

I think McCollum is elite on the offensive end and can get his shot whenever
I'd trade jrue for him
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61674 posts
Posted on 8/30/20 at 10:50 pm to
Jrue for McCollum makes more sense for the Blazers than Pels, especially now that the Pels have Ingram. The same hole that Portland would be hoping to fill by trading CJ for Jrue would open up on the Pels. As much as people understandably hate on Jrue for inconsistent and unclutch offense, he still averages a reasonably efficient 19-20 ppg for the Pels.

Even if the Pels get more ppg out of McCollum than Jrue

1) Who is CJ taking shots from, if anyone, to get those extra points? ie is it really a net gain in points on offense because he's more efficient than Jrue, or just because he takes 2 more shots per 36 minutes than Jrue? Look at the numbers, their efficiency isn't that far off from each other.

2) How many more points does CJ give up? When McCollum is On Court the Blazers DRtg is 113.6 when he's off, it's 111.4. So he makes the Blazers defense 2.2 points worse every 100 possesions.

Jrue improves the Pels defense 3.9 points per 100. Taking those stats at face value, going from Jrue to CJ makes your defense 6.1 points worse, so you need CJ to add a net gain to the offense of 6.1 points just to break even in a trade, which doesn't appear to be a reasonable expectation.

Obviously offensive and defensive impact isn't as simple as transferring numbers, and team building is chemistry, not algebra, but I think the numbers do show that people underestimate Jrue's contributions on offense and defense if they think CJ McCollum for Jrue solves more problems than it creates.

If you did do a McCollum for Jrue swap you would need stud starting defensive wing that could guard 1-4, an elite rim protector, and Zion to take a jump on defense, which he hopefully will.
Posted by Baron
Member since Dec 2014
1719 posts
Posted on 8/30/20 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

How many more points does CJ give up? When McCollum is On Court the Blazers DRtg is 113.6 when he's off, it's 111.4. So he makes the Blazers defense 2.2 points worse every 100 possesions. Jrue improves the Pels defense 3.9 points per 100. Taking those stats at face value, going from Jrue to CJ makes your defense 6.1 points worse, so you need CJ to add a net gain to the offense of 6.1 points just to break even in a trade, which doesn't appear to be a reasonable expectation.


I understand the point you are trying to make and you even acknowledge that your methodology is faulty, but this is still the wrong way to use those numbers. On/off should only be used to gauge the importance of a singular player to their specific team, because it has much more to do with who replaces that player whenever he’s off the court. For example, look at Favors’ defense on/off last year. You could argue it proves he’s a great defender (and he is a good defender), but the Pels didn’t have another competent rim protector on the the roster. That says more about the flaws of the roster than it does about Favors.

Nevertheless, I agree that the Pels shouldn’t do a Jrue for McCollum swap, but it has much more to do with CJ’s contract. His extension kicks in soon and he’s going to get paid way too much for his production. Here is what he is set to make the next 4 seasons (keep in mind he turns 29 in September):
20-21 - 29.3m
21-22 - 30.8m
22-23 - 33.3m
23-24 - 35.8m
These numbers are why I wouldn’t trade Jrue for him.
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
27454 posts
Posted on 8/31/20 at 12:53 am to
I get the fit isn't perfect but i think mccollum is going to get his shot whenever he wants

I just don't see that from ingram yet
The pels need a vet pg in the worst way
Now if they want to just grow slowly and naturally, then yeah trade jrue elsewhere
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
27454 posts
Posted on 8/31/20 at 12:55 am to
You are acting like mccollum is some scrub
Who would he take shots from?
Anyone
Have you seen him in the playoffs, once he gets hot, it's over
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61674 posts
Posted on 8/31/20 at 1:22 am to
quote:

You are acting like mccollum is some scrub


Hardly. My point is not that McCollum is overrated on offense but that Jrue is underrated so the net gain on offense would not be as great as hoped for which makes me wonder if it’d be worth the net negative the defense would take.

quote:

Who would he take shots from?


Hopefully Lonzo, but if he takes them from Zion or Ingram, what have you really gained by adding McCollum? Again, I’m not ripping on CJ as much as pointing out scoring points isn’t one of this team’s big problems. So what good does swapping Jrue for CJ bring?

People act like the Pels lost a bunch of games in the last minute because they couldn’t score. I think a more accurate description is they lost a bunch of games in the first 48 minutes because they didn’t defend well and turned the ball over too much.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32959 posts
Posted on 8/31/20 at 6:43 am to
I’m just tired of watching this team struggle in half court offense.

IMO, you can’t just take a player from one team and plug him into another, while possibly playing a completely different role, and with a different surrounding cast and expect the numbers to be representative of what to expect in the future.

I’m pitching CJ as a 1 here, he’s been playing and guarding 2’s in Portland, where he’s obviously outsized. And in a backcourt with another small guard, who has his own defensive struggles.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32959 posts
Posted on 8/31/20 at 6:50 am to
quote:

turned the ball over too much.


IMO, this is mostly due to the fact that they didn’t have a competent ball handler on the roster. Not to mention the team looked like it had zero idea what they were doing in half court offense. It’s more of a “fit” thing, than an overall feeling that I have of CJ > Jrue. I feel like Jrue is actually an overall better player than CJ, but I feel like CJ is a better fit for this team. In the proposed trade that I suggested I included a Melli or Miller swap for Collins to take in account the disparity in overall talent between the two.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
26037 posts
Posted on 8/31/20 at 8:39 am to
I think in a vacuum Jrue is better than CJ, considering neither of them should be the #1 guy on a team. CJ has better skills to be that #1, but his team would suck if he was the best player. As a high level role player, Jrue is the better team player overall.

Jrue would bring more to the Blazers than CJ does, and that doesn't diminish what CJ brings to them. with the emergence of Gary Trent Jr and Melo, they would have a very strong team with two great offensive players and two great perimeter defenders that can also score.

I'd love to get CJ just so he can play the point, and have Ingram at the 2. Draft a SF at 13 and hope for the best. Trade Lonzo/Miller to the Magic for Aaron Gordon
CJ
Ingram
#13/Hart
Zion
Gordon

I feel confident we can turn Gordon into a 38% 3 point shooter.
We would need a coach that could coach this team to be a top 5 offense, b/c defensively they may struggle.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram