Started By
Message
locked post

Louisiana Supreme Court Will Not Review Life Sentence For Man Who Stole Hedge Clippers

Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:28 am
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
120068 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:28 am
quote:

NEW ORLEANS — A man caught with stolen hedge clippers decades ago must continue to serve his life sentence, despite a stinging dissent from the chief justice of Louisiana’s Supreme Court, who said the sentence was the result of laws rooted in racism.

Justice Bernette Johnson, the only Black person on the seven-member court, outlined the case against Fair Wayne Bryant in a dissent after her colleagues, without comment, declined to review the latest appeal in the 1997 burglary case.


Bryant is eligible for parole as a result of a 2018 appellate decision. But Johnson said the sentence itself was “excessive and disproportionate.”

Bryant, who is Black, was sentenced as a habitual offender after three previous convictions. According to court records, there was a 1979 attempted armed robbery conviction — a crime classified as violent under Louisiana — and three subsequent non-violent crimes: possession of stolen things in 1987, attempted forgery of a $150 check in 1989; and simple burglary in 1992.

A state appellate court held that the sentence was in accordance with the habitual offender law and after an initial appeal failed, no longer subject to review. Johnson said the sentence was so out of proportion to the crime as to be clearly unconstitutional.

“Such petty theft is frequently driven by the ravages of poverty or addiction, and often both," Johnson wrote. “It is cruel and unusual to impose a sentence of life in prison at hard labor for the criminal behavior which is most often caused by poverty or addiction.”

She went on in her two-page dissent to give a brief history of laws passed after the Civil War to make it easier to convict former slaves and their descendants for minor crimes and sentence them harshly, an attempt, she said, to “re-enslave African Americans.”

Johnson called severe habitual offender sentences a “modern manifestation” of such laws.


quote:

In addition to being unfair, Johnson wrote, they are costly to the state. “Since his conviction in 1997, Mr. Bryant’s incarceration has cost Louisiana taxpayers approximately $518,667,” she wrote. “Arrested at 38, Mr. Bryant has already spent nearly 23 years in prison and is now over 60 years old. If he lives another 20 years, Louisiana taxpayers will have paid almost one million dollars to punish Mr. Bryant for his failed effort to steal a set of hedge clippers.”

While an appeals court declined to review the sentence, it did hold in 2018 that Bryant had been illegally denied parole eligibility. It was unclear Friday whether he has applied for parole. An attorney who handled Bryant's appeal for the Louisiana Appellate Project did not immediately respond to an emailed query.

The district attorney's office in Caddo Parish in northwest Louisiana, where the case originated, declined comment Friday.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana, reacting to Johnson's dissent, issued a news release Thursday in which it reiterated its call for the repeal of laws holding life sentences for what the organization called minor offenses. The ACLU also called on district attorneys to stop seeking such penalties.


LINK

The headlines on this case can be misleading "Guy gets life for stealing hedge clippers" because he did have a record.

quote:

Bryant, who is Black, was sentenced as a habitual offender after three previous convictions. According to court records, there was a 1979 attempted armed robbery conviction — a crime classified as violent under Louisiana — and three subsequent non-violent crimes: possession of stolen things in 1987, attempted forgery of a $150 check in 1989; and simple burglary in 1992.


But do you think he should receive a life sentence?

The one problem I have with this is the cost of housing prisoners. According to the article I linked, this has already cost tax payers over $500k.

When it comes to how much tax dollars that go into housing prisons, in a situation like this I think there can be other options that are cheaper. At the most, put him on probation for the rest of his life. Limit what he can or can't do, but require him to get a job.. Something along those lines.

Do you are agree with the sentence? Do think too much tax dollars are spent on the prison system? Any other thoughts?
Posted by BeerMoney
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2012
8785 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:31 am to
Naw. Maybe a weekly social worker and probation forever. Maybe a mental ward. Old boy was a klepto
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:31 am to
I’ve heard it called the “bitch” statute.

The habitual offender law is just that.
Posted by lsuhunt555
Teakwood Village Breh
Member since Nov 2008
38972 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:32 am to
Imagine his sentence if he would’ve stopped stealing after the first two times.
Posted by theronswanson
House built with my hands
Member since Feb 2012
3195 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:34 am to
Gotta feed the prison machine. Sad. What a wasted life
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
87181 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:35 am to
Joe Rogan going hard on Louisiana’s habitual offender laws.

Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
120068 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:35 am to
quote:

Imagine his sentence if he would’ve stopped stealing after the first two times.


I get this. He wouldn't be in this situation if he wouldn't have stole anything, but do you like a life sentence is harsh?

Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:37 am to
quote:

But do you think he should receive a life sentence?


Nope, he should be immediatly hung by the neck until dead, he is deyond redemption and there is no need to waste another cent on him.
Posted by TDcline
American Gardens building 11th flor
Member since Aug 2015
9491 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:38 am to
I’ve seen ppl get probation for all of those offenses.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
78048 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:40 am to
quote:

According to court records, there was a 1979 attempted armed robbery conviction — a crime classified as violent under Louisiana — and three subsequent non-violent crimes
Oh well. And, those are the only things he got caught doing. Probably dozens of other crimes he got away with.

quote:

Johnson wrote, they are costly to the state. “Since his conviction in 1997, Mr. Bryant’s incarceration has cost Louisiana taxpayers approximately $518,667
This is bullshite. That money was budgeted and getting spent regardless whether he was in prison or not. These sorts of numbers, like those about the cost of people on death row, are always bullshite propaganda. The money was always going to be spent on operations and salaries regardless.
Posted by Barstools
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2016
11234 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:41 am to
quote:

attempted armed robbery conviction — a crime classified as violent under Louisiana


Should be classified as violent in every state...
Posted by tLSU
Member since Oct 2007
8679 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:43 am to
Cost figures like those aren't really accurate. They're typically calculated by defense attorneys by taking the annual DOC budget and dividing it by the total number of inmates. That's not at all a true picture of what it costs to hold a prisoner.

DOC feeds for under $3 per prisoner per day due to its ability to use inmate labor to produce and prepare food. Yes, there are medical costs, but unless he's one of a handful who are sick enough to be hospitalized at a civilian hospital instead of Hunt or Dixon's infirmary, he isn't running up massive bills. There are uniform/clothing costs, which are minimal. Of course, he's using a share of electricity and utilities, staff salaries, maintenance, etc. but those costs are fixed and would exist regardless of whether or not he was there.
This post was edited on 8/9/20 at 7:44 am
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
78048 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:43 am to
quote:

Joe Rogan going hard on Louisiana’s habitual offender laws
Well, he can shove them up his arse because we still have thousands of habitual offenders all over the place commiting crimes, including murder, daily. We need more jails, not fewer.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
120068 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:43 am to
quote:

Nope, he should be immediatly hung by the neck until dead, he is deyond redemption and there is no need to waste another cent on him.



That's fricking stupid. There are people who has done a lot more and had a much lighter sentence.

There are people who committed murder who has spent a lot less time in prison than this guy will eventually serve.. Or even have served already.
Posted by tigerstripedjacket
This side of the wall
Member since Sep 2011
3125 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:47 am to
I would love to know the estimated administrative cost if he had remained free and continued to commit 3 felonies every ten years.

How much estimated property theft? Insurance costs? Loss of life/limb of victims?

Would be apply for welfare and benefits?
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:47 am to
quote:

This is bullshite. That money was budgeted and getting spent regardless whether he was in prison or not. These sorts of numbers, like those about the cost of people on death row, are always bullshite propaganda. The money was always going to be spent on operations and salaries regardless.


Yeah. But there is an incremental cost for each prisoner. Locking him up ain’t free.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
52016 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:48 am to
Yours is a question that can be looked at from different perspectives. His sentence seems bizarre considering we are letting much worse criminals out of prison due to COVID-19, and we’re sentencing much lighter than that for similar crimes.

On the other hand, I believe repeat offenders should face ever increasing penalties until they stop, or are put away for good. Judge Bernette Johnson was wrong to dissent. The other justices refused to hear an appeal because they were prevented to do so by statute. Voting to hear that appeal is setting the Justices up as legislators or Governors. It is now in the hands of those elected officials to pardon or to change the law.
Posted by tigerdup07
Member since Dec 2007
22250 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:50 am to
3 strikes and you're out.
Posted by tLSU
Member since Oct 2007
8679 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:51 am to
That's true, but unless you've reduced the population enough to take entire buildings offline, it's nominal. Even then the impact of pulling one camp at Angola, which may have been staffed by 7-8, is minimal.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
78048 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 7:51 am to
quote:

Yeah. But there is an incremental cost for each prisoner. Locking him up ain’t free
They are not going to incrementally decrease the budget either. It's not free, but as a poster below my first post stated, it is not nearly as expensive as propagandists would have you believe.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram