- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

CNN report: Police seeking white couple that dared.....
Posted on 7/6/20 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 7/6/20 at 8:26 pm
To paint over a BLM street mural.......oh the humanity. The article actually referenced that the group got a “ permit “.
A witness gave police a photograph of the suspect’s vehicle which was described as a Nissan pickup truck with the word “NICOLE” on the right side of the tailgate in silver lettering. The truck has a camper shell and the license plate is 52701B1.
“What happened yesterday to deface that mural was hostility in an ugly form,” City Councilwoman Noralea Gipner said Sunday morning on social media. “Permission was given to put that there but permission was not given to deface it.”
Did they cover the riots this way? The fact that business owners paid for a business permit? That destroying businesses was hostility in an ugly form?
Sick and tired of the media bull and hypocrisy.
More clarity:
Police said it appeared the couple came to the location “with the specific purpose of vandalizing over the mural,” noting that “The community spent a considerable amount of time painting this mural only to have the suspects destroy it by dumping and rolling paint over part of the message.”
A witness gave police a photograph of the suspect’s vehicle which was described as a Nissan pickup truck with the word “NICOLE” on the right side of the tailgate in silver lettering. The truck has a camper shell and the license plate is 52701B1.
“What happened yesterday to deface that mural was hostility in an ugly form,” City Councilwoman Noralea Gipner said Sunday morning on social media. “Permission was given to put that there but permission was not given to deface it.”
Did they cover the riots this way? The fact that business owners paid for a business permit? That destroying businesses was hostility in an ugly form?
Sick and tired of the media bull and hypocrisy.
More clarity:
Police said it appeared the couple came to the location “with the specific purpose of vandalizing over the mural,” noting that “The community spent a considerable amount of time painting this mural only to have the suspects destroy it by dumping and rolling paint over part of the message.”
This post was edited on 7/6/20 at 8:44 pm
Posted on 7/6/20 at 8:29 pm to gsvar2004
How about seeking black man that painted the street in New York with another black mans blood while walking down the road with his 6yr old daughter in broad daylight.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 8:31 pm to MizunoDude
quote:
“What happened yesterday to deface that mural was hostility in an ugly form,”
where was she when the statues were being desecrated?
Posted on 7/6/20 at 8:31 pm to MizunoDude
CNN gonna be CNN . Lie and make up crap . Go to your local bar and listen to those lies . More credibility on them and drinks to boot
Posted on 7/6/20 at 8:54 pm to MizunoDude
All of them should be painted over. Good for whoever did it
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:09 pm to MizunoDude
On the lamb for defacing some defacing.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:17 pm to MizunoDude
I disagree with what they did.
They should have covered it with white paint.
Like a nice snowfall white, or Bavarian cream. Maybe one a shade gray to match the road and be in current style.
They should have covered it with white paint.
Like a nice snowfall white, or Bavarian cream. Maybe one a shade gray to match the road and be in current style.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:25 pm to MizunoDude
quote:
deface that mural
So big, yellow block letters is now a "mural"?
Isn't that special.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:29 pm to TinGym
the community push. back could include dropping plastic bags of paint on the offending sign
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:31 pm to MizunoDude
Look forward to seeing how the courts decide on these “ murals” in public streets.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:32 pm to MizunoDude
Pretty sure i saw paint on an Abe Lincoln statue...no one gave permission for that..the man that just a few yrs ago was all the rage as Americas greatest Pres
Im pretty sure i saw a Mercrdes Benz dealership in Oakland with painting on the cars ( and bldg set on fire) I don't think anyone gave permission for that...
Im pretty sure i saw a Mercrdes Benz dealership in Oakland with painting on the cars ( and bldg set on fire) I don't think anyone gave permission for that...
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:33 pm to MizunoDude
quote:
“Permission was given to put that there but permission was not given to deface it.”
Funny...permission was given to put up the statues and memorials that have been defaced and destroyed, but that's okay.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:36 pm to MizunoDude
The MSM likes to pick and choose their outrages cafeteria-style.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 10:16 pm to MizunoDude
They should just claim they were protesting.
Back to top
