Started By
Message

re: Why Derek Chauvin May Get Off His Murder Charge

Posted on 6/23/20 at 10:46 pm to
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56919 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 10:46 pm to
quote:

There isn’t a single documented instance of a death by “excited delerium” that doesn’t involve restraint.



Restraint is a general term. Be more specific.

Restraint on its own is reasonable.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56919 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

You can’t say “excited delirium” exists outside of the police restraint. It’s not a separate diagnosis that exists apart from and without the police’s actions.



Restraint is a critical and normal part of police duties.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111795 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 10:51 pm to
Yes. And sometimes it kills people.

When you kill people, sometimes you get charged.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14274 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

Apart from the coroner's report, what makes you think he didn't have a heart attack?

quote:

Not sure I need more than that.
I was just wondering if you saw something that might have pointed to that.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111795 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

Restraint is a general term. Be more specific. Restraint on its own is reasonable.


Prone restraint over an extended period of time goes against MPD’s policy. Because they know it sometimes kills people. They know that because they paid $2M to a family in 2013.
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
50082 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 10:55 pm to
Can he even get a fair trial?
Posted by M. A. Ryland
silver spring, MD
Member since Dec 2005
2051 posts
Posted on 6/23/20 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

That’s not an interesting article. I made it to point 3.


I think you should carefully read the whole thing (especially if you are going to argue on the topic).
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111795 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 12:21 am to
It’s rehashing arguments that have been out there for weeks.

quote:

George Floyd was experiencing cardiopulmonary and psychological distress minutes before he was placed on the ground, let alone had a knee to his neck.


If the police knew this, it probably hurts more than helps. They knew he was having trouble breathing and they still kept him in prone restraint far longer than necessary.

quote:

The Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) allows the use of neck restraint on suspects who actively resist arrest, and George Floyd actively resisted arrest on two occasions, including immediately prior to neck restraint being used.


The MPD also has a policy that they’re supposed to transition a subject from prone restraint to their side if the subject is in distress.

quote:

A white paper used by the MPD acknowledges that ExDS suspects may die irrespective of force involved. The officers’ response to this situation was in line with MPD guidelines for ExDS.


No. It wasn’t. See above.

quote:

Restraining the suspect on his or her abdomen (prone restraint) is a common tactic in ExDS situations, and the white paper used by the MPD instructs the officers to control the suspect until paramedics arrive.


Jesus. All that did was make me look up the author. He’s a “researcher.” Not really.

quote:

Floyd’s autopsy revealed a potentially lethal concoction of drugs — not just a potentially lethal dose of fentanyl, but also methamphetamine.


That’s just false. We have doctors and pharmacists on this board who can confirm.

quote:

Chauvin’s neck restraint is unlikely to have exerted a dangerous amount of force to Floyd’s neck. Floyd is shown on video able to lift his head and neck, and a robust study on double-knee restraints showed a median force exertion of approximately approximately 105lbs.


The medical examiner disagrees (at least in part). And how much pressure do you think it takes to choke someone?

Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30485 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 12:32 am to
quote:

You can’t say “excited delirium” exists outside of the police restraint. It’s not a separate diagnosis that exists apart from and without the police’s actions.


What?
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30485 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 12:35 am to
quote:

Yes. And sometimes it kills people.


You realize there is no such thing as positional asphyxiation, right?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111795 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 12:43 am to
quote:

You realize there is no such thing as positional asphyxiation, right?


I’ll trade you no positional asphyxiation for no excited delirium.

And then we’re left with people dying in police custody. Then what? We just keep paying out $2M per death because the fricking police can’t follow their own manual?
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Midwest, USA
Member since Dec 2019
53430 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 6:06 am to
quote:

sure you are. you've already said you vote to convict because of what you saw on a video and how it made you feel without regards to what the actual law says. 

you are emotional. 


Actually its because the video clearly shows the man not resisting yet the officer keeps his knee on his neck for 8 minutes despite it being obvious that the man clearly having difficulty breathing.

Not sure how you think any of that is defensible but okay.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131567 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 6:23 am to
quote:

Actually its because the video clearly shows the man not resisting


Then you have chosen to not watch all of the videos. He clearly resisted. The police body cams will show him resisting in greater detail.

I’ll admit it looks horrible for the 8 minutes and 45 seconds of the video they want you to see.

But in a court of law jurors will see all of the videos and have the law explained to them.

You aren’t objective. You’ve already admitted as much.
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Midwest, USA
Member since Dec 2019
53430 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 6:32 am to
quote:

Then you have chosen to not watch all of the videos. He clearly resisted. The police body cams will show him resisting in greater detail. 



Do you understand that resisting earlier in the arrest doesn't justify the officer putting his knee on the dude's neck for 8 minutes.

That restraint was only approved to be used when a suspect was actively resisting.

quote:

I’ll admit it looks horrible for the 8 minutes and 45 seconds of the video they want you to see.


And this is the 8 minutes and 45 seconds that he'll be convicted on.

quote:

But in a court of law jurors will see all of the videos and have the law explained to them. 



Which law allows for this type of behavior?
This post was edited on 6/24/20 at 6:39 am
Posted by 10MTNTiger
Banks of the Guadalupe
Member since Sep 2012
4139 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 6:34 am to
quote:

There isn’t a single documented instance of a death by “excited delerium” that doesn’t involve restraint.


These doctor guys would disagree with you. Sorry if the facts hurt your feelings.

The study found that only 18 of 214 individuals identified as having EXD died while being restrained or taken into custody.

Stratton SJ, Rogers C, Brickett K, et al. Factors associated with sudden death of individuals requiring restraint for excited delirium. Am J Emerg Med. 2001;19(3):187–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
This post was edited on 6/24/20 at 6:36 am
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 6:34 am to
quote:

They knew each other more than casually says the Floyd family. There is much more to this.
THIS X 1000
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111795 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:33 am to
quote:

The study found that only 18 of 214 individuals identified as having EXD died while being restrained or taken into custody.


1) that’s not what it says at all
2) not everyone who is diagnosed with EXD dies. Everyone who is diagnosed with EXD and dies was restrained.

EXD is a relatively recent diagnosis. Critics of police say that police came up with the diagnosis as an out for in-custody deaths. It’s not all that far-fetched an accusation either.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30485 posts
Posted on 6/24/20 at 5:47 pm to
Where do you get no excited delirium?
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram