- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why Derek Chauvin May Get Off His Murder Charge
Posted on 6/23/20 at 10:46 pm to the808bass
Posted on 6/23/20 at 10:46 pm to the808bass
quote:
There isn’t a single documented instance of a death by “excited delerium” that doesn’t involve restraint.
Restraint is a general term. Be more specific.
Restraint on its own is reasonable.
Posted on 6/23/20 at 10:47 pm to the808bass
quote:
You can’t say “excited delirium” exists outside of the police restraint. It’s not a separate diagnosis that exists apart from and without the police’s actions.
Restraint is a critical and normal part of police duties.
Posted on 6/23/20 at 10:51 pm to moneyg
Yes. And sometimes it kills people.
When you kill people, sometimes you get charged.
When you kill people, sometimes you get charged.
Posted on 6/23/20 at 10:52 pm to the808bass
quote:
Apart from the coroner's report, what makes you think he didn't have a heart attack?
quote:I was just wondering if you saw something that might have pointed to that.
Not sure I need more than that.
Posted on 6/23/20 at 10:52 pm to moneyg
quote:
Restraint is a general term. Be more specific. Restraint on its own is reasonable.
Prone restraint over an extended period of time goes against MPD’s policy. Because they know it sometimes kills people. They know that because they paid $2M to a family in 2013.
Posted on 6/23/20 at 10:55 pm to Paul Maul number 37
Can he even get a fair trial?
Posted on 6/23/20 at 11:23 pm to the808bass
quote:
That’s not an interesting article. I made it to point 3.
I think you should carefully read the whole thing (especially if you are going to argue on the topic).
Posted on 6/24/20 at 12:21 am to M. A. Ryland
It’s rehashing arguments that have been out there for weeks.
If the police knew this, it probably hurts more than helps. They knew he was having trouble breathing and they still kept him in prone restraint far longer than necessary.
The MPD also has a policy that they’re supposed to transition a subject from prone restraint to their side if the subject is in distress.
No. It wasn’t. See above.
Jesus. All that did was make me look up the author. He’s a “researcher.” Not really.
That’s just false. We have doctors and pharmacists on this board who can confirm.
The medical examiner disagrees (at least in part). And how much pressure do you think it takes to choke someone?
quote:
George Floyd was experiencing cardiopulmonary and psychological distress minutes before he was placed on the ground, let alone had a knee to his neck.
If the police knew this, it probably hurts more than helps. They knew he was having trouble breathing and they still kept him in prone restraint far longer than necessary.
quote:
The Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) allows the use of neck restraint on suspects who actively resist arrest, and George Floyd actively resisted arrest on two occasions, including immediately prior to neck restraint being used.
The MPD also has a policy that they’re supposed to transition a subject from prone restraint to their side if the subject is in distress.
quote:
A white paper used by the MPD acknowledges that ExDS suspects may die irrespective of force involved. The officers’ response to this situation was in line with MPD guidelines for ExDS.
No. It wasn’t. See above.
quote:
Restraining the suspect on his or her abdomen (prone restraint) is a common tactic in ExDS situations, and the white paper used by the MPD instructs the officers to control the suspect until paramedics arrive.
Jesus. All that did was make me look up the author. He’s a “researcher.” Not really.
quote:
Floyd’s autopsy revealed a potentially lethal concoction of drugs — not just a potentially lethal dose of fentanyl, but also methamphetamine.
That’s just false. We have doctors and pharmacists on this board who can confirm.
quote:
Chauvin’s neck restraint is unlikely to have exerted a dangerous amount of force to Floyd’s neck. Floyd is shown on video able to lift his head and neck, and a robust study on double-knee restraints showed a median force exertion of approximately approximately 105lbs.
The medical examiner disagrees (at least in part). And how much pressure do you think it takes to choke someone?
Posted on 6/24/20 at 12:32 am to the808bass
quote:
You can’t say “excited delirium” exists outside of the police restraint. It’s not a separate diagnosis that exists apart from and without the police’s actions.
What?
Posted on 6/24/20 at 12:35 am to the808bass
quote:
Yes. And sometimes it kills people.
You realize there is no such thing as positional asphyxiation, right?
Posted on 6/24/20 at 12:43 am to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
You realize there is no such thing as positional asphyxiation, right?
I’ll trade you no positional asphyxiation for no excited delirium.
And then we’re left with people dying in police custody. Then what? We just keep paying out $2M per death because the fricking police can’t follow their own manual?
Posted on 6/24/20 at 6:06 am to Rebel
quote:
sure you are. you've already said you vote to convict because of what you saw on a video and how it made you feel without regards to what the actual law says.
you are emotional.
Actually its because the video clearly shows the man not resisting yet the officer keeps his knee on his neck for 8 minutes despite it being obvious that the man clearly having difficulty breathing.
Not sure how you think any of that is defensible but okay.
Posted on 6/24/20 at 6:23 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Actually its because the video clearly shows the man not resisting
Then you have chosen to not watch all of the videos. He clearly resisted. The police body cams will show him resisting in greater detail.
I’ll admit it looks horrible for the 8 minutes and 45 seconds of the video they want you to see.
But in a court of law jurors will see all of the videos and have the law explained to them.
You aren’t objective. You’ve already admitted as much.
Posted on 6/24/20 at 6:32 am to Rebel
quote:
Then you have chosen to not watch all of the videos. He clearly resisted. The police body cams will show him resisting in greater detail.
Do you understand that resisting earlier in the arrest doesn't justify the officer putting his knee on the dude's neck for 8 minutes.
That restraint was only approved to be used when a suspect was actively resisting.
quote:
I’ll admit it looks horrible for the 8 minutes and 45 seconds of the video they want you to see.
And this is the 8 minutes and 45 seconds that he'll be convicted on.
quote:
But in a court of law jurors will see all of the videos and have the law explained to them.
Which law allows for this type of behavior?
This post was edited on 6/24/20 at 6:39 am
Posted on 6/24/20 at 6:34 am to the808bass
quote:
There isn’t a single documented instance of a death by “excited delerium” that doesn’t involve restraint.
These doctor guys would disagree with you. Sorry if the facts hurt your feelings.
The study found that only 18 of 214 individuals identified as having EXD died while being restrained or taken into custody.
Stratton SJ, Rogers C, Brickett K, et al. Factors associated with sudden death of individuals requiring restraint for excited delirium. Am J Emerg Med. 2001;19(3):187–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
This post was edited on 6/24/20 at 6:36 am
Posted on 6/24/20 at 6:34 am to Tigahs24Seven
quote:THIS X 1000
They knew each other more than casually says the Floyd family. There is much more to this.
Posted on 6/24/20 at 8:33 am to 10MTNTiger
quote:
The study found that only 18 of 214 individuals identified as having EXD died while being restrained or taken into custody.
1) that’s not what it says at all
2) not everyone who is diagnosed with EXD dies. Everyone who is diagnosed with EXD and dies was restrained.
EXD is a relatively recent diagnosis. Critics of police say that police came up with the diagnosis as an out for in-custody deaths. It’s not all that far-fetched an accusation either.
Posted on 6/24/20 at 5:47 pm to the808bass
Where do you get no excited delirium?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)