- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
96,000 Patient Study shows hydroxychloroquine increased risk of death
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:47 am
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:47 am
quote:
A study of 96,000 hospitalized coronavirus patients on six continents found that those who received an antimalarial drug promoted by President Trump as a “game changer” in the fight against the virus had a significantly higher risk of death compared with those who did not.
People treated with hydroxychloroquine, or the closely related drug chloroquine, were also more likely to develop a type of irregular heart rhythm, or arrhythmia, that can lead to sudden cardiac death, it concluded.
The study, published Friday in the medical journal the Lancet, is the largest analysis to date of the risks and benefits of treating covid-19 patients with antimalarial drugs. It is based on a retrospective analysis of medical records, not a controlled study in which patients are divided randomly into treatment groups — a method considered the gold standard of medicine. But the sheer size of the study was convincing to some scientists.
quote:
Peter Lurie, a former top FDA official who now heads the Center for Science in the Public Interest, called the report “another nail in the coffin for hydroxychloroquine — this time from the largest study ever.”
LINK /
Hopefully now we can focus more on something that works.
This post was edited on 5/22/20 at 7:49 am
14
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:47 am to tigerinDC09
I don’t believe them.
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:48 am to tigerinDC09
It's like you are too afraid to fricking link shite.
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:48 am to tigerinDC09
tigerinDC09: They used it (the dossier) for a Carter Page FISA. The part they used has been largely verified.
LINK
tigerinDC09: I'm saying that in this instance, there is publicly available information that indicates that the FISA application was well founded.
LINK
tigerinDC09: Steele's sources provided reliable information re:Carter Page that wasn't available via other public sources. It has now been confirmed. Page originally denied any contact, but now says he may have "spoken briefly" with them. This bolsters the reliability Steele's sources does it not?
LINK
LINK
tigerinDC09: I'm saying that in this instance, there is publicly available information that indicates that the FISA application was well founded.
LINK
tigerinDC09: Steele's sources provided reliable information re:Carter Page that wasn't available via other public sources. It has now been confirmed. Page originally denied any contact, but now says he may have "spoken briefly" with them. This bolsters the reliability Steele's sources does it not?
LINK
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:48 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
Hopefully now we can focus more on something that works.
You ain't bright.
By the way. When did the left suddenly become very interested in the governments dictating to doctors how they may choose to treat their patients?
You're pathetic
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:48 am to tigerinDC09
It was posted 3 post below yours already
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:48 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
Hopefully now we can focus more on something that works.
It does work and there are mountains of evidence saying so.
You fricking cocksuckers put politics above actual on the ground facts.
and apparently you lack the ability to scan the fricking first page before you start another thread
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:49 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
People treated with hydroxychloroquine, or the closely related drug chloroquine, were also more likely to develop a type of irregular heart rhythm, or arrhythmia, that can lead to sudden cardiac death, it concluded.
this is a known side effect... potential QT prolongation... this is not a shocking new development with the drug.
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:50 am to gthog61
quote:
and apparently you lack the ability to scan the fricking first page before you start another thread
Calm down, it was posted 1 min before mine.
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:50 am to tigerinDC09
News flash:
Drug can have side effects
Drug can have side effects
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:50 am to tigerinDC09
Well, your credibility is still shite...
And there it is... bless your retarded heart...
quote:
not a controlled study in which patients are divided randomly into treatment groups
And there it is... bless your retarded heart...
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:51 am to tigerinDC09
quote:It took you that long to not link you indiscriminate slut.
Calm down, it was posted 1 min before mine.
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:51 am to Jbird
quote:
It's like you are too afraid to fricking link shite.
He pulled it from WaPo but yep. You're correct.
It's also a rehash of a prior story.
They literally didn't compensate for beginning condition.
In other words, they compared the results of people who used the drug with those who don't WITHOUT compensating for the fact that people who were prescribed the drug were in WORSE condition at the start.
Which, of course, makes sense because people doing fine without the drug are less likely to get it prescribed.
Basically, DC is pathetic and stupid and a liar...……..again
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:52 am to The Maj
quote:Wonder choad has been anchored with the quickness.
And there it is... bless your retarded heart...
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:52 am to ShortyRob
quote:
When did the left suddenly become very interested in the governments dictating to doctors how they may choose to treat their patients?
This isn't left or right, it's called the FDA
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:53 am to tigerinDC09
quote:Praise be to the fed gov, which pos agency are you drawing a check from?
This isn't left or right, it's called the FDA
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:54 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
This isn't left or right, it's called the FDA
because lifetime government employees have NO POLITICAL BIASES WHATSOEVER NEVER EVER EVER
hahahahahahaha
You are a fricking clown, there are examples right here in this thread of your prior clownishness but you ignore them and babble on.
You have the self-awareness of a tree.
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:54 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
This isn't left or right, it's called the FDA
So “left.” Got it.
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:55 am to Jbird
quote:
has been anchored with the quickness.
The other thread beat me to the punch, i'll be posting in that thread now.
Posted on 5/22/20 at 7:55 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
This isn't left or right, it's called the FDA
Cool story
From your non-link
quote:
The new study’s findings cannot necessarily be extrapolated to people with mild illness at home or those, like Trump, who are taking the antimalarials as a prophylactic
quote:
A large study of health-care workers that examines the use of hydroxychloroquine as a preventive measure against covid-19 is in the works, but no results have been released.
And again, as I already pointed out. That analysis did NOT control for INITIAL condition...……...which is honestly, such an obvious oversight that you can't even call it an error.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News