Started By
Message

re: This is the dumbest most over reactive shite ever

Posted on 3/13/20 at 7:45 am to
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 7:45 am to
quote:

More people have died of the flu this year than the covoid-19. This is purely propaganda from the media making this out to be as big as ebola. its crazy. Yes we need to take precautions but they are slowly shutting down all daily life because of something that doesn't even have as high of a death rate than the flu.


There is so much dumb in this post, I don’t know where to start. Almost every word is wrong
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
14023 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 7:46 am to
quote:

It was done from panic. And a desire to destroy as much of the economy as possible.


Yeah, the NCAA lost millions that will never be recouped just to destroy the economy.
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
14023 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 7:56 am to
quote:

There is so much dumb in this post, I don’t know where to start. Almost every word is wrong


We truly are living in the post-truth era.

COVID-19 is almost twice as contagious as the flu and the mortality rate is at least 10x and as much as 30x that of the flu. It hasn’t killed as many yet only because it’s only been in our country for a few weeks.

The NCAA shut everything down over PLAYER safety after the virus already has spread on one NBA team.
Posted by deaux
Member since Oct 2018
20267 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 8:08 am to
quote:

desire to destroy as much of the economy as possible.


This has to be one of the dumbest things I continue to see posted. Y’all are absolute morons.
Posted by RMLtiger
Prairieville
Member since Sep 2009
771 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 8:40 am to
quote:

I don’t think any of us know if there’s an overreaction simply because we don’t know how all this will play out honestly. Anybody saying different isn’t being honest.


No doubt about it! Don’t you love of the “know it all” and “matter of fact” attitudes of all the Joe Blows everywhere? It’s quite comical.
Posted by monstranceclock76
Texas
Member since Jul 2019
932 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 9:01 am to
quote:

This is the dumbest most over reactive shite ever


They are doing it to prevent spikes of the virus so health care systems dont get over run with patients. It's called being proactive.
Posted by ForeverEllisHugh
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
14922 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 9:02 am to
Does Chicken have a beef (intended) with Moscona?

Weird that my thread supporting his position got whacked.
Posted by deaux
Member since Oct 2018
20267 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 9:06 am to
quote:

Does Chicken have a beef (intended) with Moscona?

Weird that my thread supporting his position got whacked.


Your thread probably got whacked because you were advocating that people should trust a sports radio host in Baton Rouge instead of actual experts.
Posted by BleedgurpleTX
Member since Mar 2019
539 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 9:25 am to
Get ahead of the spread. That simple. We don’t want to be Italy or China.
Health is far more important than a sport.
Posted by Geauxboy
NW Arkansas
Member since Oct 2006
4856 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 9:37 am to
quote:

There is so much dumb in this post, I don’t know where to start. Almost every word is wrong


So you don't know anything either or you would have posted it.
Posted by MontanaTiger
Montana
Member since Oct 2008
3799 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 9:54 am to
quote:

COVID-19 is almost twice as contagious as the flu and the mortality rate is at least 10x and as much as 30x that of the flu.


You have fallen for the media trap. Yes, it is 10X more deadly than the flu, but the mortality rate for it is still only 1%-3%. How can that be when it’s 10X deadlier than the flu? Because the death rate for the flu is less than one percent. See how a factual number can be sensationalized to make it look far worse than it really is?
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
24727 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 9:59 am to
This is a good podcast. The German response is probably the best.
70% of the population will get it...
LINK
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
14023 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 9:59 am to
quote:

You have fallen for the media trap. Yes, it is 10X more deadly than the flu, but the mortality rate for it is still only 1%-3%. How can that be when it’s 10X deadlier than the flu? Because the death rate for the flu is less than one percent. See how a factual number can be sensationalized to make it look far worse than it really is?


3% mortality is huge. Yes, you cancel a sporting event with mortality rates that high. FFS, schools temporarily close over measles outbreaks.
Posted by J2thaROC
Member since May 2018
13082 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:12 am to
quote:

You have fallen for the media trap. Yes, it is 10X more deadly than the flu, but the mortality rate for it is still only 1%-3%. How can that be when it’s 10X deadlier than the flu? Because the death rate for the flu is less than one percent. See how a factual number can be sensationalized to make it look far worse than it really is?


But you’ve fallen into another trap. While 1-3% doesn’t sound bad (and it’s not if you were only talking 1-3% of say, 1million people) it is bad when you realize that with how contagious this virus is, if left unchecked, over half the population of the United States will contract it. Do the math. There are roughly 350million people in the United States. If half those people get it, that’s over 150million people who would get it THIS YEAR. Now take 1-3% of 150million. That’s how many deaths you are looking at in the United States alone. That’s 1 to 3 million people in a year and that’s actually a low side figure. We aren’t sure if once a person has had this if they are just as susceptible to it again.
This post was edited on 3/13/20 at 10:15 am
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
14023 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:13 am to
quote:

Do the math. There are roughly 350million people in the United States. If half those people get it, that’s over 150million people who would get it THIS YEAR. Now take 1-3% of 150million


But muh Moscona said...
Posted by MontanaTiger
Montana
Member since Oct 2008
3799 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:15 am to
quote:

3% mortality is huge.


Even if it is 3%, which you conveniently took as the actual rate when it is the upper limit of the estimated rate, huge compared to what? That would mean that 97% of those infected won’t die. And the vast majority of mortalities are in the very old and frail. Why doesn’t the media present the data as “the survival rate for covid-19 is at least 97%”? They don’t do that because it sounds a lot less scary.
Posted by J2thaROC
Member since May 2018
13082 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:16 am to
quote:

But muh Moscona said...


Moscona licks bathroom stalll doors. I wouldn’t take anything he says about health seriously.
Posted by J2thaROC
Member since May 2018
13082 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:17 am to
quote:

Even if it is 3%, which you conveniently took as the actual rate when it is the upper limit of the estimated rate, huge compared to what? That would mean that 97% of those infected won’t die. And the vast majority of mortalities are in the very old and frail. Why doesn’t the media present the data as “the survival rate for covid-19 is at least 97%”? They don’t do that because it sounds a lot less scary.



The media is absolutely acknowledging that it’s worse on the elderly and those who are already sick. Are you saying we shouldn’t do everything possible to prevent THOSE people from dying? What kind of monster are you?
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
14023 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:18 am to
quote:

Even if it is 3%, which you conveniently took as the actual rate when it is the upper limit of the estimated rate, huge compared to what?


1% is huge, you dolt. The average person that contracts COVID-19 infects 2.2 other people. By comparison, the flu is 1.3x. Cases are multiplying daily, the last update I saw has Louisiana at 33 and our first case was this week. It'll be in the hundreds before the weekend and thousands soon after that.

You not caring if 1% of the people die so that you can watch basketball is a sad commentary.
Posted by MLCLyons
Member since Nov 2012
4712 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:27 am to
quote:

Why did it go from playing without fans to not playing at all so fast?


because athletes started testing positive.

The number of cases is starting to increase rapidly. There were 70 total on March 1st and now we're up to around 2,000. Those 2,000 were likely contagious for days before they tested positive so that 2,000 will turn in to 5-10k in a week.
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram