- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Californians want LGBT Pedophiles exempt from the sex offender rolls
Posted on 2/18/20 at 8:00 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Posted on 2/18/20 at 8:00 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
I read a follow-up article that said the 10 year exemption from mandatory registering is already the law for vaginal intercourse. This new bill would make it the law for everyone who is convicted of one of the sex offense crimes.
If that's the case, which makes much more sense, this article is fake news trash.
with 14 year old girls?
clown
Posted on 2/18/20 at 8:10 pm to Jax-Tiger
At the end it says it is how the state treats straight interactions....so do not really have an issue with it.
Think of it this way.
You go on Tinder. A girl says she is 19. You meet, have sex. Turns out she is 15 and you find out by cops arresting you.
Is that the same as a guy lurking out a kid online or in a park? No. So ability to separate certain cases isn't necessarily a bad thing. It should be rare to exclude an individual, but possible based on the situation(like the one I listed above).
Think of it this way.
You go on Tinder. A girl says she is 19. You meet, have sex. Turns out she is 15 and you find out by cops arresting you.
Is that the same as a guy lurking out a kid online or in a park? No. So ability to separate certain cases isn't necessarily a bad thing. It should be rare to exclude an individual, but possible based on the situation(like the one I listed above).
Posted on 2/18/20 at 8:27 pm to Kentucker
Based on that wording , it would allow discretion to not punish a 19 year old for life because he fricked a sixteen year old.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 11:36 pm to Jax-Tiger
quote:
Seems logical...
Exempt Pedos if they are LGBT
well that means it will be open season on these perverts and the judges should be tared and feathered.
they keep pushing this BS till someone will go postal.
wicked and sick world.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 12:36 am to s2
Why did I even read this thread?
Posted on 2/19/20 at 7:16 am to Jax-Tiger
What then stops all sex offenders from claiming they are LGBQT thus removing themselves from the sex offender registry?
Posted on 2/19/20 at 7:30 am to Jax-Tiger
Boy you set that shiny hook up correctly because a lot of people bit.
There is a lot of people i disagree with and that is okay, but jeez the amount of you who read a headline and go straight into outrage mode with doing research is scary.
Big ups to posters I've argued and disagreed with before that made the effort to actually read the bill. You the real heroes.
There is a lot of people i disagree with and that is okay, but jeez the amount of you who read a headline and go straight into outrage mode with doing research is scary.
Big ups to posters I've argued and disagreed with before that made the effort to actually read the bill. You the real heroes.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 7:41 am to Jax-Tiger
.....of course they do......it's California.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 7:44 am to Jax-Tiger
Fake news.
Right now under California law, according to this Fox News LINK :
Right now under California law, according to this Fox News LINK :
quote:It’s a no-brainer.
The current law states that while consensual sex between a 15- to 17-year-old and a partner within 10 years of age is illegal, if the pair is having vaginal intercourse, a judge will decide if the accused has to register as a sex offender. Other forms of sex automatically require someone to register as a sex offender.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 7:51 am to Jax-Tiger
The bill sets the same standard for all sex crimes involving certain minors, regardless of the sexual orientation of the offender.
The entire premise of your thread is false, and you should feel badly about yourself.
The entire premise of your thread is false, and you should feel badly about yourself.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 7:53 am to Jax-Tiger
Yeah your article is trash.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 7:56 am to SammyTiger
quote:So, now, if the 17yo girlfriend fricks her 19yo boyfriend and daddy don’t like it, the boyfriend is eligible for judicial discretion on the offender list, but if she just gives him a hummer, he is stuck on the list for life.
Basically now the law differentiates between vaginal and anal/oral sex with teenagers 15 or older.
So currently, a judge can use discretion for a 19 year old and 17 year old having vaginal sex and not for a 19 year old and a 17 year old having anal sex.
That makes a LOT of sense, and we should actively opposed the radical legislation which would expand that discretion to hummers.
And OP ... 19 vs 17 is not pedophilia.
This post was edited on 2/19/20 at 7:59 am
Posted on 2/19/20 at 8:01 am to gthog61
quote:As usual, you completely miss the point.quote:with 14 year old girls?
I read a follow-up article that said the 10 year exemption from mandatory registering is already the law for vaginal intercourse. This new bill would make it the law for everyone who is convicted of one of the sex offense crimes.
If that's the case, which makes much more sense, this article is fake news trash.
clown
If this article and thread were addressing the 10-year differential (with regard to either hetero- or homosexual activity) I think that most people would actually agree with you. That is not the topic of either the proposed legislation or the thread.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 8:03 am to Jax-Tiger
Are they saying that these folks aren't mentally stable enough to be held accountable for their actions?
This post was edited on 2/19/20 at 8:04 am
Posted on 2/19/20 at 8:10 am to Turbeauxdog
Pathetic attempt at something by someone without the skills to pull it off.
Posted on 2/19/20 at 8:19 am to Jax-Tiger
Trump informed us five years ago that the media were the enemy of the people, and here is the list of people who still fell for the fake news link in the thread:
Jax-Tiger
25smeckles
Jay Quest
Tecate
BuckyCheese
Choctaw
SirWinston
keakar
Presidio
RTRLSD
Dead End
gthog61
Trevaylin
s2
Never let any of these people tell you you're stupid. May they be sent to the library *makes a C-shape with his hand*
Jax-Tiger
25smeckles
Jay Quest
Tecate
BuckyCheese
Choctaw
SirWinston
keakar
Presidio
RTRLSD
Dead End
gthog61
Trevaylin
s2
Never let any of these people tell you you're stupid. May they be sent to the library *makes a C-shape with his hand*
Posted on 2/19/20 at 8:50 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
If that's the case, which makes much more sense, this article is fake news trash.
It is.
I clicked on the site and looked at the header and could tell from that alone that it was trash. I decided to read the article and then the bill, and it was pretty clear.
Yall have to get better about this. This site is very clearly a trash news website from first glance, yet some of yall actually read it. Don't.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News