- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PT lawyers....how fast does Stone walk on appeal?
Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:11 am to boosiebadazz
Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:11 am to boosiebadazz
now you are an attorney 
1
Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:12 am to SDVTiger
get new material Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:14 am to AggieHank86
We don’t have the shuffling mechanism but that sounds awesome. I may run that up the flag pole. I can’t see why either side of the aisle would object.
Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:16 am to boosiebadazz
You have said many times you are a paralegal loser that takes depos and brings the lawyers coffee
Maybe you went up in the world since you were banned
But dont be mad at me
Maybe you went up in the world since you were banned
But dont be mad at me
Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:18 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
We don’t have the shuffling mechanism but that sounds awesome. I may run that up the flag pole. I can’t see why either side of the aisle would object.
I agree. Boosie, perhaps this legislative session?
I’m willing to help
This post was edited on 2/14/20 at 9:19 am
Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:19 am to AggieHank86
quote:
but I do not see any appellate court in this country overruling a trial court judge who declines dismissal for cause purely for belonging to a political party OR for opposing a politician who is not personally on trial.
Then they aren’t doing their job. Democrats are proving everyday their ridiculous politics overrules everything.
However, this shouldn’t have been an issue because the request to change venue should have been granted.
Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:24 am to Rebel
quote:You are mistaken. Rule 24
Hank, I’m no attorney, but I thought the judge picks the jurors in federal cases?
Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:24 am to SDVTiger
I mean I’m a better lawyer now six years out than I was six months out, but I don’t know what you want me to say 
Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:25 am to SavageOrangeJug
I wuz born wit big gums, sir!
Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:26 am to Bourre
quote:
A senior Obama administration official was also part of the jury.
I haven’t kept up like I should and didn’t know this. Good Lawd! Either someone lied in voir dire or Stone had village idiots for a defense team.
Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:26 am to Buddy Red
Especially now that we’re heading for a lower threshold and more jury trials.
I’m gonna put some feelers out.
My TD email to maintain anonymity is boosiebadazz225 at gmail dot com if you’re serious about kicking ideas around.
I’m gonna put some feelers out.
My TD email to maintain anonymity is boosiebadazz225 at gmail dot com if you’re serious about kicking ideas around.
Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:26 am to boosiebadazz
Imagine hiring a lawyer who spends as much time as you do on tigerdroppings poliboard
Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:28 am to SDVTiger
And yet a ton of people do and send their brother and their cousin back to me when they have a problem.
It’s the damndest thing
It’s the damndest thing
Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:28 am to boosiebadazz
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/10/21 at 8:11 am
Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:30 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
He deserves on, don't ya think?
quote:
Yes
Odd. You’ve been arguing for days that Trumps response to his sentencing recommendations was tantamount to obstruction of justice. Now you’ve acknowledged that Stone didn’t get justice.
Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:31 am to Buddy Red
Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:32 am to NC_Tigah
quote:Her social media posts were about Trump, not Stone. She said she could set aside partisanship to be fair to Stone.
Hart claimed she could be fair. If her written contemporaneous accounts indicate otherwise, the matter is absolutely subject to appeal.
Her sole post related to Stone addressed the debacle of his arrest. The only thing it MIGHT show is that she was less than 100% forthcoming regarding her familiarity with him as an individual. That post could even be read as pro-Stone, as it was critical of the amount of force used to arrest the man.
Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:32 am to boosiebadazz
of course they do Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:33 am to boosiebadazz
Does STD not understand that legal assistants do not take depos?
Posted on 2/14/20 at 9:34 am to AggieHank86
quote:So Jerry Nadler would be fine as a juror as long as he claimed he could be fair?
Lawyers can certainly argue the point, but I do not see any appellate court in this country overruling a trial court judge who declines dismissal for cause purely for belonging to a political party OR for opposing a politician who is not personally on trial.
Yet a physician can be excluded from a med mal jury simply because he's an MD?
We live in one of the most politically partisan times in US history. A jury comprised of political partisans overseeing a political prosecution (if not for Stone's support of Trump, he'd never have been subject to the BS) of a political defendant cannot possibly be fair and impartial.
It would be about like Jussie Smollett being tried in front of a jury full of David Duke prototypes all claiming they'd be fair.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News