- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Based Boris wants a UNILATERAL trade deal with US before negotiating with EU
Posted on 1/19/20 at 10:39 am to bamarep
Posted on 1/19/20 at 10:39 am to bamarep
While his is likely good for the US, I wonder if it is really best for Britain.
Instead of being one of the senior members of a large trade bloc, they basically become an economic client-state of the USA.
Instead of being one of the senior members of a large trade bloc, they basically become an economic client-state of the USA.
9
Posted on 1/19/20 at 10:41 am to AggieHank86
You're talking out of your arse again.
You act as if GB does this that the EU will just cut them off and not trade with them.
Your TDS is affecting your judgement.
You act as if GB does this that the EU will just cut them off and not trade with them.
Your TDS is affecting your judgement.
Posted on 1/19/20 at 10:43 am to AggieHank86
quote:
While his is likely good for the US, I wonder if it is really best for Britain.
Instead of being one of the senior members of a large trade bloc, they basically become an economic client-state of the USA.
Not only that, I imagine they will be using some previous framework in order to negotiate rather quickly, as negotiating trade deals from scratch take upwards of a half-decade.
Posted on 1/19/20 at 11:01 am to AggieHank86
Senior member of a block you just fired yourself from?
Not sure putting most of your eggs back in that basket would be best.
Not sure putting most of your eggs back in that basket would be best.
Posted on 1/19/20 at 11:06 am to AggieHank86
You are commenting from afar on a situation that the UK has real, not theoretical, experience on for the last 20+ years. They are much closer to the ground on this than you. Their call.
Posted on 1/19/20 at 11:15 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Instead of being one of the senior members of a large trade bloc, they basically become an economic client-state of the USA.
You know literally nothing about the details of any US-UK trade deal.
Nor are you an economist.
Nor are you a diplomat.
Yet you make a definitive pejorative assumption about an as-yet-to-be-announced trade axis between two sovereign nations.
Stop.
Posted on 1/19/20 at 11:53 am to AggieHank86
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/17/21 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 1/19/20 at 11:56 am to AggieHank86
quote:
While his is likely good for the US, I wonder if it is really best for Britain.
I guess we’ll find out, but “what’s best for Britain” is not our concern.
Posted on 1/19/20 at 11:57 am to AggieHank86
There you go again, awkwardly trying to play both sides.
GB has a top 5 economy within the EU, but not the strongest. A deal with the US gives them a tremendous amount of leverage in the EU negotiations. This is fantastic for GB, which is why BoJo wants it so bad.
GB has a top 5 economy within the EU, but not the strongest. A deal with the US gives them a tremendous amount of leverage in the EU negotiations. This is fantastic for GB, which is why BoJo wants it so bad.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 9:27 am to AggieHank86
quote:
While his is likely good for the US, I wonder if it is really best for Britain.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News