- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What’s the Left’s endgame
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:54 pm
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:54 pm
I watched an episode on Tucker about a store owner who is getting stolen blind because San Francisco has implemented a law that says, petty theft will not be prosecuted.
This got me thinking about the Left’s endgame. What is it?
Surely these higher ups that shelter illegals, turn a blind eye to crimes, side with America’s enemies, promote every imaginable moral evil, must know that society will ultimately be destroyed by their behaviors right?
Is it as simple as they plan to get their’s and get out when anarchy hits?
Or, are they really so blinded by ideology that they think their plans will work in the long run?
I think about this often, because their behaviors to me are both illogical and self destructive.
This got me thinking about the Left’s endgame. What is it?
Surely these higher ups that shelter illegals, turn a blind eye to crimes, side with America’s enemies, promote every imaginable moral evil, must know that society will ultimately be destroyed by their behaviors right?
Is it as simple as they plan to get their’s and get out when anarchy hits?
Or, are they really so blinded by ideology that they think their plans will work in the long run?
I think about this often, because their behaviors to me are both illogical and self destructive.
8
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:55 pm to Revelator
Hunger Games.
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:59 pm to Revelator
I’ve asked the same on here. I think the “Left” is actually two independent parts: (1) intelligent elites; and (2) the rest - gullible, dumb and even crazy.
The elites end game is total control of society - no different than leftist elites throughout modern history (Russia, China, Venezuela, etc.).
The elites use the rest to do their bidding. Since we remain a voting republic, the elites can’t use brute force against their opponents yet. Once they have enough power though, that’ll come later.
This is why the elites are weaponizing speech and attempting to take guns.
The elites end game is total control of society - no different than leftist elites throughout modern history (Russia, China, Venezuela, etc.).
The elites use the rest to do their bidding. Since we remain a voting republic, the elites can’t use brute force against their opponents yet. Once they have enough power though, that’ll come later.
This is why the elites are weaponizing speech and attempting to take guns.
Posted on 1/7/20 at 9:01 pm to Revelator
The end game is to breed and immigrate us into oblivion. When they get control with no chance for opposition, like in CA, you can see what they plan to do because they do it.
Posted on 1/7/20 at 9:02 pm to DeltaDoc
quote:
The elites end game is total control of society - no different than leftist elites throughout modern history (Russia, China, Venezuela, etc.).
But in this type of system, modern politicians would also be replaced, right?
Posted on 1/7/20 at 9:03 pm to Revelator
What is either side’s endgame?
Posted on 1/7/20 at 9:03 pm to Revelator
Same as the right's endgame. To inflate the national debt with no regard to the long term ramifications as long as helps them hold on to power.
This post was edited on 1/7/20 at 9:07 pm
Posted on 1/7/20 at 9:04 pm to Revelator
Not the elite leftist. There is a sizable portion of elites in Russia and China. You don’t have to be the tip of the spear to be in a protected class
Posted on 1/7/20 at 9:04 pm to dchunk
quote:
What is either side’s endgame?
Well, I would think the conservative side would be against discouraging or destroying the producers.
Posted on 1/7/20 at 9:07 pm to Crimson Wraith
quote:
Hunger Games.
Posted on 1/7/20 at 9:09 pm to Revelator
quote:
Well, I would think the conservative side would be against discouraging or destroying the producers.
Well based on the name, you would think the "conservative" side would be for reducing spending but we know that's not true.
This post was edited on 1/7/20 at 9:13 pm
Posted on 1/7/20 at 9:09 pm to Revelator
They are hoping that somehow impeachment and our "unprovoked attacks" on Iran will get the POTUS double-impeached with transgender and BLM cream on top.
This post was edited on 1/7/20 at 9:13 pm
Posted on 1/7/20 at 9:09 pm to DeltaDoc
I think the short answer is:
They don’t know what the endgame is because they just want the power.
They will worry about the end game once they have the keys. Then they’ll worry about the issues they have caused.
They don’t know what the endgame is because they just want the power.
They will worry about the end game once they have the keys. Then they’ll worry about the issues they have caused.
This post was edited on 1/7/20 at 9:12 pm
Posted on 1/7/20 at 9:10 pm to PiscesTiger
quote:
They are hoping that somehow impeachment and our "encroachments" on Iran will get the POTUS double-impeached with transgender and BLM cram on top.
My OP isn’t about the Left’s short term goals but it’s endgame
Posted on 1/7/20 at 9:12 pm to Revelator
They are, in other words, for anything to happen as long as Trump is out. That is their end game...according to their own short-sighted vantage point.
Posted on 1/7/20 at 9:13 pm to dstone12
quote:
They will worry about the end game once they have the keys.
that's when they turn on their useful idiots and wipe them out
Posted on 1/7/20 at 9:14 pm to PiscesTiger
quote:
They are, in other words, for anything to happen as long as Trump is out. That is their end game...according to their own short-sighted vantage point.
But the Left was busy creating self destructive polices long before Trump.
Posted on 1/7/20 at 9:17 pm to Revelator
Yeah but Bush was last conservative who left office before Trump. Twitter had. It started and Facebook was just now gaining massive popularity. Trump is first Rep to endure the mass media age at its highest.
I agree. They've always been pulling out stops but never like this.
I agree. They've always been pulling out stops but never like this.
Posted on 1/7/20 at 9:28 pm to Revelator
I think about this more than I should.
98% of the federal level pols do as they're told (be it from voters or people with money). It's the game. It's the best one in the world from top to bottom with respect to how the population lives so that's how it goes.
It's been this way from jump here too.
A 5% tax increase, gun confiscation, with only 30% or so public support and next thing you know Washington is crossing the Delaware to kill people on Christmas.
A crazy actor who hates the president and is very vocal about the entire affair and gets a lot of press for it (sound familiar?) Decides to kill said president. This in the hopes of keeping the resistance going. Did I mention he was from a state that wanted to side with the Union but wouldn't let them use the trains to move the army to fight the Confederacy? Almost like they wanted it both ways, huh?
Something will give sooner or later. You can't keep shitting on the people making life possible for people on either end of the spectrum (yeah, rich and poor alike depend on the plant baws and small business owners whom all get truly horse fricked tax wise in this country) and not expect a correction given the history of this place.
98% of the federal level pols do as they're told (be it from voters or people with money). It's the game. It's the best one in the world from top to bottom with respect to how the population lives so that's how it goes.
It's been this way from jump here too.
A 5% tax increase, gun confiscation, with only 30% or so public support and next thing you know Washington is crossing the Delaware to kill people on Christmas.
A crazy actor who hates the president and is very vocal about the entire affair and gets a lot of press for it (sound familiar?) Decides to kill said president. This in the hopes of keeping the resistance going. Did I mention he was from a state that wanted to side with the Union but wouldn't let them use the trains to move the army to fight the Confederacy? Almost like they wanted it both ways, huh?
Something will give sooner or later. You can't keep shitting on the people making life possible for people on either end of the spectrum (yeah, rich and poor alike depend on the plant baws and small business owners whom all get truly horse fricked tax wise in this country) and not expect a correction given the history of this place.
Posted on 1/7/20 at 9:30 pm to Revelator
The destruction of Western civilization.
The fallacy of the Cold War is that we won. Certainly the Soviets did not win. But we didn’t win either. Just as certainly as a strategic exchange of nuclear weapons, no one emerges from the kind of war we fought with them as a winner. Both sides knew that a military confrontation was undesirable given the level of destruction that would have ensued, and so each chose an alternative method of undoing their opposition that seemed most likely to succeed. The West chose to destroy the Soviet bloc economically, because, given the Communists’ iron grip on internal public discourse and disadvantageous economic position, it was the means most open and conducive to ultimate success. The Soviets chose to destroy the West culturally, because, given Western countries’ economic power and encouragement of free exchange of ideas, it was the means most open and conducive to ultimate success.
We “won” because our way worked faster, but their way was just as effective. It just took longer to work. The important difference now is that, given time, a society can recover from a collapse of its economy. I don’t know how a society recovers from a collapse of the culture upon which it is founded.
The fallacy of the Cold War is that we won. Certainly the Soviets did not win. But we didn’t win either. Just as certainly as a strategic exchange of nuclear weapons, no one emerges from the kind of war we fought with them as a winner. Both sides knew that a military confrontation was undesirable given the level of destruction that would have ensued, and so each chose an alternative method of undoing their opposition that seemed most likely to succeed. The West chose to destroy the Soviet bloc economically, because, given the Communists’ iron grip on internal public discourse and disadvantageous economic position, it was the means most open and conducive to ultimate success. The Soviets chose to destroy the West culturally, because, given Western countries’ economic power and encouragement of free exchange of ideas, it was the means most open and conducive to ultimate success.
We “won” because our way worked faster, but their way was just as effective. It just took longer to work. The important difference now is that, given time, a society can recover from a collapse of its economy. I don’t know how a society recovers from a collapse of the culture upon which it is founded.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News