- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Freshman Congreswoman from VA Doesn't Understand How Burden of Proof Works re: Impeachment
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:03 am to TBoy
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:03 am to TBoy
quote:
right wing
I don't think you know what that term means, as evidenced by the fact you're defending an authoritarian statist who wants to place the burden of proof on the accused and doesn't believe in the right of the accused to face his accuser.
1
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:04 am to SDVTiger
I really cant wait for a redo of this....
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:05 am to TBoy
quote:
Trump refused to present witnesses
Sure about that?
I seem to remember a list presented by Devin Nunes that was poo pooed by a certain bug eyed clown.
I guess I also missed the minority hearing day in the Judiciary Committee. Maybe you can provide a link to it.
He can request anyone not testify. They can take it to the courts and test the legality of the situation. But that doesn't fit the timeline for certain folks.
quote:
refused to respond to subpoenas for evidence
Take it to the courts then. They exist for the reason. Wonder why he hasn't been compelled to testify?
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:06 am to McLemore
quote:
I don't think you know what that term means,
Low T doesnt know. Thats his trigger word from DU. But hes a far far left winger which is classic
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:06 am to The Maj
In the same line as the early Bolshevist executioners like Sverdlov
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:09 am to teke184
The AA vote is the total wild card. I agree with your assessment. The sheer scale of the absentee ballot cheating in those two states is crazy though. Go back and look at the Orange country district vote totals over the last few elections. It will make your skin crawl. Also look at the district Katie Hill, she of throuple Fame. Only reason they'll win anything in those two states in 2020
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:12 am to fjlee90
quote:
Take it to the courts then. They exist for the reason. Wonder why he hasn't been compelled to testify?
Some have already been in the court system. Don Mcgahn for one. But the Dems said nah, we'll just issue our own ruling that trumps any other co-equal branch of government.
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:22 am to TBoy
quote:
Trump refused to present witnesses,
The minority hearing day isn't about Trump calling witnesses. That's not how it works. It's the Republicans in the House that are entitled and conduct that process, not the President. That comes at the Senate trial.
But of course Dems denied the minority hearing day. No two ways about it.
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:24 am to davyjones
quote:
But of course Dems denied the minority hearing day. No two ways about it.
Even if it gets to the Senate, they're not guaranteed that it'll even go to trial. Roberts may smack it down right out of the gate since the approved House rules weren't followed.
Then there's the LOLtastic issue of Sleepy Joe saying he's not going to comply with a Senate subpoena for an IMPEACHMENT TRIAL.
Dude was President of the Senate for 8 years and he doesn't understand how that half works?
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:25 am to VoxDawg
I was waiting for someone to yell out "do you not understand what 'Due Process' is?"
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:25 am to VoxDawg
It's not his job to prove his innocence, but your job to prove his guilt. That's the way things work in the United States.
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:26 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
Spooks gonna spook, man. She knows what the rules are, but like her handlers, she voluntarily chooses to run roughshod over them.
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:54 am to VoxDawg
I can't fathom what the Escobar lady was saying a short while ago. I believe she was using as an example a governor, going on to say that if a governor insisted that he/she was going to "defy subpoenas" then changed the wording to "I'm going to fight the subpoenas" that "the governor would go to jail". That's one of the most outrageously either dishonest or badly, badly uneducated things I've ever heard within a discussion of legal principles.
She couldn't be more wrong if she tried. There's a motion that's filed quite often for the purpose of "fighting" a subpoena that one has received. It's a Motion to Quash the subpoena and it rather common. It defies belief what these people are willing to say.
She couldn't be more wrong if she tried. There's a motion that's filed quite often for the purpose of "fighting" a subpoena that one has received. It's a Motion to Quash the subpoena and it rather common. It defies belief what these people are willing to say.
Posted on 12/12/19 at 10:27 am to TBoy
quote:
It's to the point where it isn't even interesting anymore.
I hope that means you are leaving.
BYE!
Posted on 12/12/19 at 10:53 am to deathvalleytiger10
One could only hope. TBoy has to retreat to DU like a ghost from Pac-Man after he gets chomped.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News