- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Graham: Impeachment 'dead on arrival' in Senate if Dems keep whistleblower from testifying
Posted on 11/10/19 at 7:51 pm to DavidTheGnome
Posted on 11/10/19 at 7:51 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
DavidTheGnome
Do you wear a helmet?
Posted on 11/10/19 at 8:00 pm to SSpaniel
Yeah so what he's got prior convictions for fraud, his credibility isn't at issue.....yours is!!
Posted on 11/10/19 at 8:06 pm to SSpaniel
quote:
But, in this scenario, the transcript (pic) shows you not shooting the guy.
Lol yeah in this case the transcript is NOT good for the prosecution thus the efforts to utilize hearsay, the subject of the hearsay being icky feels about what they think Trump's intent REALLY was.
I can't believe I even type that out. It's like a first day criminal procedure hypothet that cartoonishly demonstrates what you cannot get into trial.
Posted on 11/10/19 at 8:07 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
If there was evidence that I committed whatever I’m accused of why would the motive of the accuser matter? Are the cops gonna go ohhhhh DTG your ex is just pissed, flush the kilo of coke on you and we’re cool. Just don’t do it again though ok? Yessir officer.
What if there is no coke? The guy just said you had the coke and he happens to be your business partner who is screwing your wife and who will take over your business if you are sent to jail. Still doesn’t matter what the motive is?
This post was edited on 11/10/19 at 8:08 pm
Posted on 11/10/19 at 8:15 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
If there was evidence that I committed whatever I’m accused of why would the motive of the accuser matter
In a custody battle, would you want the judge to take your husband’s word as gospel for every accusation without motive?
His motive is his interpretation. His interpretation is the evidence.
Posted on 11/10/19 at 8:33 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
What a clusterfricke these last three years have been.
Yeah, thanks to these guys.....
quote:
there are a pile of people both from the left and former Trump administration officials that think he needs to go.
PDJT been kicking arse and taking names. Promises kept in spite of this Shite Clown Show.
Imagine if we had a normal functioning Government that accepted the results of an election?
Posted on 11/10/19 at 8:42 pm to Speckhunter2012
Imagine if it were an ordinary human being that was taking these sniper shots from every direction, all day every day. Good thing our boy's ten foot tall and bullet proof.
Posted on 11/10/19 at 8:45 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
I’m not, so fill me in on how I’m wrong.
Accuser: DTG raped me.
DTG: It was consensual sex.
Accuser: Why would I lie about that?
DTG: You have a boyfriend and cheated on him.
Accuser: My motive is irrelevant!
DTG: Ok I guess I'm guilty.
Posted on 11/10/19 at 8:49 pm to WPBTiger
Turtle better tell Chuckie to frick off.
The Hill
?
@thehill
Sen. Chuck Schumer: "I'm ready to sit down with Leader McConnell and try to come up with fair rules [on impeachment]. There's no reason why we shouldn't be able to do that."
The Hill
?
@thehill
Sen. Chuck Schumer: "I'm ready to sit down with Leader McConnell and try to come up with fair rules [on impeachment]. There's no reason why we shouldn't be able to do that."
Posted on 11/10/19 at 8:50 pm to WPBTiger
The only way we can expose this fraud is to have a full trial in the senate. That’s what I’m pulling for.
Posted on 11/10/19 at 9:32 pm to SSpaniel
quote:
Sir, you've been accused of murder. We have an eyewitness that says he saw you do it."
In this scenario wouldn't it be that "we have someone that heard you were accused of murder by an eye witness. And while we know everyone that could be an eye witness and none of them say you did it, but this 3rd party account says you did"
Posted on 11/10/19 at 9:39 pm to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
In this scenario wouldn't it be that "we have someone that heard you were accused of murder by an eye witness. And while we know everyone that could be an eye witness and none of them say you did it, but this 3rd party account says you did"
Actually, yeah, it would.
"And we choose to believe this person who heard things over the security video footage that shows that, while you were in fact at the scene, you and the deceased had a genial conversation, shook hands and you left. But this guy over here heard from his brother in laws sisters hairdresser that you killed the dude, so we're going with that. And no, you may not question our witness. I mean, what reason would you have other than to try to discredit them?"
Posted on 11/10/19 at 9:48 pm to DavidTheGnome
If this is true, then why has every smidgeon if social media presence of the whistleblower been wiped?
Posted on 11/10/19 at 10:27 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Why does it matter, what could they possibly have to ask him? It wouldn’t matter if it were Hillary herself, Trumps actions are what’s under question and the motive of the whistleblower should be irrelevant.
Why does it matter?! Seriously??
It fricking matters because this fricking “whistleblower” filed a complaint and accused the President of United States of America of committing a crime, and his accusations are the sole basis for which this entire impeachment charade was opened on. If someone accuses you of a crime, and you go to trial for it, you have the right to face your accuser and have your counsel cross examine them. The prosecution doesn’t get to pick and choose which witnesses a defense can call. And guess what happens when an accuser refuses to cooperate in a case, IT GETS DROPPED.
More importantly, when you think your “accusations” are enough to remove a duly elected President and overturn an election, you need to convince those whose votes you are trying nullify- that a serious crime was committed.
Now maybe you can answer this- why the change of heart from Dems and the whistleblower about testifying?? The 180 happened after we discovered Schiff lied about when he received the complaint and about his staff having prior discussions with the WB— is that just a coincidence? And spare us the bullshite excuse of “concern for his safety”- bc we all know that the only fricking people who harass and assault their “political enemies” are your fellow Democrats. Coincidentally, the same party who has a long track record of prosecuting, silencing and/or retaliating against any whistleblowers who is perceived as a threat to their party- see Snowden, Assange, Manning, the recent cbs employee, the list goes on.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 12:01 am to DavidTheGnome
Your ex is just pissed and accuses you of abuse...you have no proof otherwise...do her motives matter now???
Jeeez...
Jeeez...
Posted on 11/11/19 at 12:09 am to DMAN1968
An impeachment inquiry without an impeachment vote is just theater
Dems are running a shadow procedure to try to avoid actual rules and oversite
It really means nothing until Pelosi puts it to a vote to formalize the proceedings
Dems are running a shadow procedure to try to avoid actual rules and oversite
It really means nothing until Pelosi puts it to a vote to formalize the proceedings
Posted on 11/11/19 at 6:32 am to supatigah
When this latest attempt to remove the president fails, Shifty needs to be drawn and quartered, or at least charged for treason. He is a despicable piece of crap.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 6:35 am to CDawson
quote:
He said “if”. Wtf, it’s dead no matter what.
I think he means that Republican leadership in the Senate will simply ignore the House's vote and won't even bother setting up a trial in the Senate.
This post was edited on 11/11/19 at 6:38 am
Posted on 11/11/19 at 8:14 am to WPBTiger
Whistleblower doesn’t matter. It’s about evidence. The anonymous call to report the robbers entering the bank means nothing. It’s the evidence of the act that matters.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 8:15 am to dolamite
quote:
When this latest attempt to remove the president fails
I think we all know that the Senate will not vote to remove Trump from office.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News