- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NY Times: Sondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo
Posted on 11/5/19 at 1:56 pm
Posted on 11/5/19 at 1:56 pm
quote:
In a substantial update to his initial account, Gordon D. Sondland recounted how he told Ukrainian officials military aid was tied to their commitment to investigations President Trump wanted.
...
The disclosure from Gordon D. Sondland, the United States ambassador to the European Union, in four new pages of sworn testimony released on Tuesday, confirmed his involvement in essentially laying out a quid pro quo to Ukraine that he had previously not acknowledged.
The testimony offered several major new details beyond the account he gave the inquiry in a 10-hour interview last month. Mr. Sondland provided a more robust description of his own role in alerting the Ukrainians that they needed to go along with investigative requests being demanded by the president’s personal lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani. By early September, Mr. Sondland said, he had become convinced that military aid and a White House meeting were conditioned on Ukraine committing to those investigations...
LINK
20
Posted on 11/5/19 at 1:57 pm to lalouisiane
Was he lying now or then?
quote:
he had become convinced
Oh boy.
This post was edited on 11/5/19 at 1:59 pm
Posted on 11/5/19 at 1:58 pm to lalouisiane
Very interesting. Will the building pressure be enough to cause the Republican Party to turn on this Outsider who is trying to de-rail the Trillion Dollar Gravy Train?
Posted on 11/5/19 at 1:58 pm to lalouisiane
Gordon D. Sondland: Oh damn, I almost forgot. Could ypou please add this part. Not sure how significant it is or why I didn't bring it up initially.
Posted on 11/5/19 at 1:58 pm to lalouisiane
Mr. Sondland had to go back and rewrite it to satisfy the dims. 
They'll get his arse one way or another.
They'll get his arse one way or another.
Posted on 11/5/19 at 1:59 pm to lalouisiane
So was he lying the first time or is he lying this time.
But either way he's a liar.
But either way he's a liar.
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:00 pm to Janky
quote:
Was he lying now or then?
If he wishes to maintain his cushy Wash DC career, he'd better turn on Trump the Outsider.
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:01 pm to lalouisiane
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:02 pm to lalouisiane
Sondland was told his testimony would not qualify him for the televised hearings.
He then asked to amend his testimony.
True story.
He then asked to amend his testimony.
True story.
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:03 pm to VoxDawg
Was his testimony done under oath?
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:04 pm to Janky
quote:Neither. His interpretation was Biden was part of the deal. When he verified with the WH, he was told there is no QPQ related to Biden. However, there was a desire to force EU contributions, and to ensure US money wasn't getting tossed into a corrupt sewer.
Was he lying now or then?
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:04 pm to VoxDawg
check fricking mate
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:05 pm to bamarep
Im guessing if you are going to lie, it is better to do it in a text message vs under oath in a congressional hearing
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:12 pm to lalouisiane
Congrats on completely discrediting yourself.
Interested to see if any evidence is introduced to prove this statement is accurate.
Like the text that states "no quid pro quo" of any kind...
Interested to see if any evidence is introduced to prove this statement is accurate.
Like the text that states "no quid pro quo" of any kind...
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:13 pm to lalouisiane
Hmmmm. I wonder if his updated testimony has anything to do with the Project Veritas video dropped today saying ABC has all the info on the pedos Epstein helped. These webs are crazy.
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:14 pm to VoxDawg
Apparently Sondland corrected his testimony in light of the evidence that contradicts his testimony.
That’s pretty significant.
That’s pretty significant.
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:14 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Neither. His interpretation was Biden was part of the deal. When he verified with the WH, he was told there is no QPQ related to Biden. However, there was a desire to force EU contributions, and to ensure US money wasn't getting tossed into a corrupt sewer.
This is interesting. So, what you are saying is they were not withholding because of Biden, but because they didn't want the funds to be used for nefarious reasons?
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:15 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
Hmmmm. I wonder if his updated testimony has anything to do with the Project Veritas video dropped today saying ABC has all the info on the pedos Epstein helped. These webs are crazy.
I'm thinking it has more to do with him not wanting to go to jail for lying to congress. He had his memory "refreshed".
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:17 pm to lalouisiane
LOL
Yes, completely contradicting prior sworn testimony with your "impressions" is a solid choice.
Yes, completely contradicting prior sworn testimony with your "impressions" is a solid choice.
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:17 pm to lalouisiane
Ohh... does this mean that they've actually got him this time?
Page 1 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News