- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NY Times: Sondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:21 pm to Tiger985
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:21 pm to Tiger985
quote:
Sondland was told his testimony would not qualify him for the televised hearings.
He then was coached on how to reword his testimony.
True story.
FIFY
0
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:22 pm to SSpaniel
quote:
Ohh... does this mean that they've actually got him this time?
He's the Teflon Don 
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:26 pm to lalouisiane
It's not hard at all to remember the truth.
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:29 pm to kcpawpoint
Two posts in 18 months, both are today. 
kcpawpoint
kansas city, mo
Member since May 2018
2 posts
Online
kcpawpoint
kansas city, mo
Member since May 2018
2 posts
Online
This post was edited on 11/5/19 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:29 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
LINK
Kyle Cheney
@kyledcheney
READ: Sondland submitted this amendment to his testimony, saying other witnesses refreshed his recollection tha tmilitary aid was withheld as part of Trump's push to get a Biden investigation going.
Maybe I spoke too soon, this looks bad. Why does sondland think it was Quid pro quo when Trump told him it wasn't before? this is just confusing.
Kyle Cheney
@kyledcheney
READ: Sondland submitted this amendment to his testimony, saying other witnesses refreshed his recollection tha tmilitary aid was withheld as part of Trump's push to get a Biden investigation going.
Maybe I spoke too soon, this looks bad. Why does sondland think it was Quid pro quo when Trump told him it wasn't before? this is just confusing.
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:31 pm to kcpawpoint
quote:
Sondland submitted this amendment to his testimony, saying other witnesses refreshed his recollection
"Well, by golly, if THEY thought it was a quid pro quo, then I guess I better think it's one as well."
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:31 pm to kcpawpoint
But the aid wasn’t withheld and wasn’t spoken about in the call.
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:31 pm to kcpawpoint
quote:
military aid was withheld as part of Trump's push to get a Biden investigation going.
But it wasn't. The aid was given WITHOUT any Biden investigation
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:31 pm to Jbird
quote:
Two posts in 18 months, both are today.
been lurking off and on, decided to pop the cherry
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:32 pm to kcpawpoint
quote:
witnesses refreshed his recollection tha tmilitary aid was withheld as part of Trump's push to get a Biden investigation going.
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:32 pm to JayDeerTay84
quote:
But the aid wasn’t withheld and wasn’t spoken about in the call.
He did that part via mind waves or ESP or something.
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:33 pm to SSpaniel
It’s like asking a kid the same question 40 times. After 5 times they ain’t so fricking sure.
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:33 pm to kcpawpoint
quote:
been lurking off and on, decided to pop the cherry
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:33 pm to lalouisiane
Convinced in early September by whom? And hadn’t the financial aid started flowing by then?
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:34 pm to kcpawpoint
quote:
saying other witnesses refreshed his recollection tha tmilitary aid was withheld as part of Trump's push to get a Biden investigation going.
That would make his testimony tainted, wouldn't it?
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:34 pm to kcpawpoint
quote:
Why does sondland think it was Quid pro quo when Trump told him it wasn't before? this is just confusing.
Because he's lying.
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:34 pm to kcpawpoint
quote:
saying other witnesses refreshed his recollection
And this is why only two recollections of the matter are important:
Both of them come from Presidents. They have facts.
Gordon Sondland and company are not Presidents. They have opinions.
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:36 pm to kcpawpoint
I highly doubt, you popped any cherries in your life time !!
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:36 pm to lalouisiane
Update? You mean lie I was lying then or I'm lying now. Sounds like he's lying now since he has already been captured saying the reverse. Why? who knows.
A circle jerk is all we have about nothing. Since no laws have been broken. The president sets foreign policy and it is based on what's good for the American people. The president is constitutionally bound to enforce the law when it comes to tax payer's money. And he insisted on that.
A circle jerk is all we have about nothing. Since no laws have been broken. The president sets foreign policy and it is based on what's good for the American people. The president is constitutionally bound to enforce the law when it comes to tax payer's money. And he insisted on that.
Posted on 11/5/19 at 2:37 pm to Big Jim Slade
quote:
Convinced in early September by whom?
Adam Schiff. "Amb. Sondland, you see what Muelller did to Flynn and a few other people that did absolutely nothing wrong. We can do that too. They are in jail and/or their lives are ruined. Now, I'm not pressuring you or anything, but what, again, do you think your recollection of Trump's interaction with Ukraine was?"
"umm... now that I think about it, a quid pro quo?"
*Schiff nods approvingly* "There, that wasn't so hard, was it? Now just amend your testimony and we'll be good."
This post was edited on 11/5/19 at 2:39 pm
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News