Started By
Message
locked post

DOJ tells Mueller his testimony must remain "within boundaries" of report

Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:21 pm
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20931 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:21 pm

LINK

quote:

A Justice Department official told former Special Counsel Robert Mueller that his upcoming testimony to House lawmakers "must remain within the boundaries" of the public, redacted version of his report, in a letter obtained by Fox News on Monday evening.

quote:

The letter, obtained exclusively by Fox News, signed by Associate Deputy Attorney General Bradley Weinsheimer, states: “Dear Mr. Mueller: I write in response to your July 10, 2019 letter concerning the testimonial subpoenas you received from the House Judiciary Committee (HJC) and House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI).

“Your letter requests that the Department provide you with guidance concerning privilege or other legal bars applicable to potential testimony in connection with those subpoenas."

quote:

After stating the decision to testify is Mueller's to make, the letter continues: "But the Department agrees with your stated position that your testimony should be unnecessary under the circumstances. The Department generally does not permit prosecutors such as you to appear and testify before Congress regarding their investigative and prosecutorial activity.

quote:

"Should you testify, the Department understands that testimony regarding the work of the Special Counsel's Office will be governed by the terms you outlined on May 29 -- specifically, that the information you discuss during your testimony appears in, and does "not go beyond," the public version of your March 22, 2019 report to the Attorney General or your May 29 public statement."

quote:

It continued: "Finally, any testimony must remain within the boundaries of your public report because matters within the scope of your investigation were covered by the executive privilege, including information protected by law enforcement, deliberative process, attorney work product, and presidential communications privileges.

Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
73201 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:22 pm to
Good.

It is an abuse of the legal system to talk shite on people not charged with a crime
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:22 pm to
Well duh.

Bill Barr is not fricking around when it comes to the DOJ policy against disparaging uncharged individuals.

Comey disobeyed that policy when he revealed to the world that he was investigating Trump and his campaign in March 2017 during testimony on the house.
Posted by airlinehwypanhandler
Airline Highway
Member since Feb 2019
2130 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:23 pm to
This is going to be the boringest inquiry of all time.

Media networks will hype it up big time and all pre-empt their daytime schedules to air it live, and we will get nothing but "No comment" and "I can't comment on an ongoing DOJ investigation" over and over again.

It will be like that time Washington D.C. all went to bars to hear Comey's congressional testimony that one day thinking it was going to be the end of Trump.
Posted by Clark14
Earth
Member since Dec 2014
26234 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:23 pm to
Hmmmm,an admission that there is a lot to hide.

But we shouldn't be concerned about that.
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20931 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

an admission that there is a lot to hide.

Where in the DOJ letter does it admit that there is a lot to hide?

Also, what is being hidden?
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
75295 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:26 pm to
frick Mueller.
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20931 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

frick Mueller.

/thread
Posted by airlinehwypanhandler
Airline Highway
Member since Feb 2019
2130 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:27 pm to
I think the likes of Jim Jordan will try to ask tough questions but they will all be deflected or shut down with "Can't comment on that"

The real person who needs to be questioned is Weissman
Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
33191 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

Hmmmm,an admission that there is a lot to hide.


“interesting” take
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6733 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:27 pm to
So the dems are only going to get the answers that are in the report but reps are going to be able to grill him on sleazy tactics used?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
74307 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:27 pm to
Just concerned with posters making sh!t up.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
52362 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:27 pm to
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!




Muh Honest Bob is being silenced!




REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
52362 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:28 pm to
The report is out there for you to read yourself you moron!



Quick, run along and read it and let us know what there is to hide.


Hurry back!
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112665 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:28 pm to
Oopsie.

Nadless and Schiff-for-brains ain't gonna like that.
This post was edited on 7/22/19 at 6:30 pm
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
57082 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:30 pm to
quote:

Hmmmm,an admission that there is a lot to hide.


Or you know, well established rules not regarding non-disclosure of grand jury proceedings. Dummy.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
87581 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

Hmmmm,an admission that there is a lot to hide.


Hmmmm, SOMEBODY sounds disappointed that the Democrats might not get those campaign sound bytes they’re looking for.
This post was edited on 7/22/19 at 6:32 pm
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
101956 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:33 pm to
This will cause a melt. The rabid idiots on the networks will spin headlines like "Barr warns Mueller to restrict testimony".

When in reality, it would appear Mueller asked for guidance on what he can discuss. DOJ says he can publicly discuss the report he made public. These are the facts Mueller himself made available, anything else brings the question, why wasnt that in the report.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162869 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:35 pm to
A judge rebuked honest Bob for muh russia lies and Barr for releasing the report. but yeah honest Bob go ahead and read the trifling load of oppo reseach fairy tale of lawfare bloggers.
Posted by airlinehwypanhandler
Airline Highway
Member since Feb 2019
2130 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

When in reality, it would appear Mueller asked for guidance on what he can discuss. DOJ says he can publicly discuss the report he made public. These are the facts Mueller himself made available, anything else brings the question, why wasnt that in the report.



Here is what will happen

Democrat: "Mr. Mueller, do you believe Trump committed any crimes"

Mueller: "I am not at liberty to speculate"

Democrat: "Mr. Mueller, do you believe Trump should be impeached"

Mueller: "This is not my place to speculate"

Democrat: "Nothing Further."

Media: "BREAKING: MUELLER REFUSES TO SAY WHETHER OR NOT TRUMP COMMITTED A CRIME. THE FACT HE DID NOT DENY TRUMP COMMITTED A CRIME IS A BAD LOOK FOR THE PRESIDENT"
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram