Started By
Message

re: looks like a push to change the limit on spcks in LA is coming or....

Posted on 6/26/19 at 2:33 pm to
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30152 posts
Posted on 6/26/19 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

yeah - I just hope this improves the spawning mass and the drop is not habitat related, as is my hunch.


well all you idiots refuse to see the truth

they did this in big lake, the home of the largest trophy trout fishing anywhere.

the result was an immediate reduction in sizes of fish and numbers of fish. it devastated the fishery there and it has never recovered, its now just an average fishery.

just because you dont want to keep fish doesnt mean you have the right to deny others the ability to put fish in the freezer and feed their families.

you act like socialist democrats saying even though science says we dont need to reduce limits, i feel good virtue signaling by asking everyone to be penalized for no reason at all

the level of stupid is beyond the pale when its clear the reductions in fish are directly linked to fish die off from the bad freezes we had over the last 5 years. hell 2 years in a row the pelicans were dying all over the state from lack of food when the freeze killed all the marsh fish they feed on.

limits are fine as they are, but go ahead and keep begging the government to take your rights away, raise taxes, and disregard science and over regulate
Posted by Elusiveporpi
Below I-10
Member since Feb 2011
2577 posts
Posted on 6/26/19 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

limits are fine as they are


Based on your gut feeling, not facts, right?
Posted by marinebioman
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Feb 2005
3396 posts
Posted on 6/26/19 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

well all you idiots refuse to see the truth they did this in big lake, the home of the largest trophy trout fishing anywhere. the result was an immediate reduction in sizes of fish and numbers of fish. it devastated the fishery there and it has never recovered, its now just an average fishery. just because you dont want to keep fish doesnt mean you have the right to deny others the ability to put fish in the freezer and feed their families. you act like socialist democrats saying even though science says we dont need to reduce limits, i feel good virtue signaling by asking everyone to be penalized for no reason at all the level of stupid is beyond the pale when its clear the reductions in fish are directly linked to fish die off from the bad freezes we had over the last 5 years. hell 2 years in a row the pelicans were dying all over the state from lack of food when the freeze killed all the marsh fish they feed on. limits are fine as they are, but go ahead and keep begging the government to take your rights away, raise taxes, and disregard science and over regulate


So if the trend that you are blaming continues and freezes happen more often, resulting in more poor recruitment years, thereby lowering the trout population, we should still keep our current limits and wipe out the fishery? It’s called being proactive instead of reactive. It’s a concept so many ignorant people fail to grasp. Reactive management is destined to fail.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81955 posts
Posted on 6/26/19 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

the result was an immediate reduction in sizes of fish and numbers of fish. it devastated the fishery there and it has never recovered, its now just an average fishery.
Wait, what did?
Posted by Bedhog
Denham Springs
Member since Apr 2019
3741 posts
Posted on 6/26/19 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

well all you idiots refuse to see the truth

they did this in big lake, the home of the largest trophy trout fishing anywhere.
fish Big Lake a bunch. Oyster reef raping and the regulation of the wiers killed the fishery. But I still see Jared Adam's AND Jeremy Waltrip killing the trout all the time.
Posted by redneck
Los Suenos, Costa Rica
Member since Dec 2003
53641 posts
Posted on 6/26/19 at 3:22 pm to
at "feeding your family" with limits of trout. If you are truly worried about "feeding your family" you can buy groceries for a lot cheaper than a fishing trip.
Posted by Drunken Crawfish
Member since Apr 2017
3829 posts
Posted on 6/26/19 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

they did this in big lake, the home of the largest trophy trout fishing anywhere.

the result was an immediate reduction in sizes of fish and numbers of fish. it devastated the fishery there and it has never recovered, its now just an average fishery.


I don't think that them lowering the creel limit has anywhere near the impact on the fishery as the hard freezes in 2017 and the amount of freshwater intrusion from spring rains that the lake has had the last 5 years.
Posted by TxWadingFool
Middle Coast
Member since Sep 2014
4425 posts
Posted on 6/27/19 at 2:46 pm to
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram