- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: looks like a push to change the limit on spcks in LA is coming or....
Posted on 6/26/19 at 1:09 pm to KemoSabe65
Posted on 6/26/19 at 1:09 pm to KemoSabe65
quote:yeah - I just hope this improves the spawning mass and the drop is not habitat related, as is my hunch.
Will happen at the fall commission meeting with zero objections.
4
Posted on 6/26/19 at 2:31 pm to choupiquesushi
I don't think it's 100% habitat, maybe 95%.
Any Wahoo could catch a limit ten+ years ago on plastic, not so much today even on the eastside. There's absolutely no consistency from one day to the next anymore. We need the COE to rock the ship channel on Cal which would decrease the silt in the lake and dredging costs.
Any Wahoo could catch a limit ten+ years ago on plastic, not so much today even on the eastside. There's absolutely no consistency from one day to the next anymore. We need the COE to rock the ship channel on Cal which would decrease the silt in the lake and dredging costs.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 2:33 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:
yeah - I just hope this improves the spawning mass and the drop is not habitat related, as is my hunch.
well all you idiots refuse to see the truth
they did this in big lake, the home of the largest trophy trout fishing anywhere.
the result was an immediate reduction in sizes of fish and numbers of fish. it devastated the fishery there and it has never recovered, its now just an average fishery.
just because you dont want to keep fish doesnt mean you have the right to deny others the ability to put fish in the freezer and feed their families.
you act like socialist democrats saying even though science says we dont need to reduce limits, i feel good virtue signaling by asking everyone to be penalized for no reason at all
the level of stupid is beyond the pale when its clear the reductions in fish are directly linked to fish die off from the bad freezes we had over the last 5 years. hell 2 years in a row the pelicans were dying all over the state from lack of food when the freeze killed all the marsh fish they feed on.
limits are fine as they are, but go ahead and keep begging the government to take your rights away, raise taxes, and disregard science and over regulate
Posted on 6/26/19 at 3:57 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:
yeah - I just hope this improves the spawning mass and the drop is not habitat related, as is my hunch.
Every single time this has been scientifically examined it has led to the conclusion that your hunch is correct and limits have nothing to do with it. Recreational anglers simply aren’t successful enough for it to matter. Lowering limits is popular because it makes people feel like something is being done about them not catching fish, but in reality it’s all about the habitat.
Posted on 6/30/19 at 1:07 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:
yeah - I just hope this improves the spawning mass and the drop is not habitat related, as is my hunch.
The drop is absolutely habitat related. You have the same regulations for years and only NOW the trout population takes a hit.
Marsh erosion has been known to be sending this problem our way for a long time.
Do not expect a reduced creel and size limit to make a difference. We could change the law to zero creel and the trout would not rebound to the levels they were at 12ish years ago.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News