- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump vs. Mazars
Posted on 6/26/19 at 10:09 am
Posted on 6/26/19 at 10:09 am
So how melty is this board going to be when the Mazars case gets upheld and SCOTUS refuses to take up writs??
And then the Court in the Deutsche Bank/Capitol One case uses that decision as precedent?
I'd put it at about a 5.5-6.5. Slightly melty, but not democrats on 11/8/16 melty.
And then the Court in the Deutsche Bank/Capitol One case uses that decision as precedent?
I'd put it at about a 5.5-6.5. Slightly melty, but not democrats on 11/8/16 melty.
3
Posted on 6/26/19 at 10:10 am to tandrews37
I haven’t a clue what you are talking about
Posted on 6/26/19 at 10:19 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
That would an historically bad decision. Allowing congress to obtain financial records for political purposes is scary. Where would it stop?
Posted on 6/26/19 at 11:33 am to ljhog
quote:
Where would it stop?
probably at the point where it's no longer political.
that wasn't very hard.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 11:35 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:12 pm to tandrews37
quote:
probably at the point where it's no longer political.
that wasn't very hard.
Trump! made alot of money, paid alot of taxes.
Not political.
that wasn't very hard.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:35 pm to Meauxjeaux
quote:
Trump! made alot of money, paid alot of taxes.
Not political.
that wasn't very hard.
1)
LINK
2)
It's not about him making money. It is about him inflating his wealth when he wanted to take out loans, and deflated his wealth when he wanted to skirt around paying taxes.
It's almost as if you have absolutely no idea whatsoever what exactly happened that led to Trump suing his own accounting firm.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:38 pm to ljhog
What's scary is "progressives" absolutely cheering on police state tactics.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:40 pm to tandrews37
Want to explain what the hell you are talking about?
You will get no discussion if you drive-by post without giving context.
ETA: I googled your case since you didn’t provide anything at all. What exactly is it that you think will come from this case again? And what does the Capital One case have to do with anything?
Further, beyond political ammunition, what is it that you think will come out of the Oversight Committee reviewing these records? Because after all, that is the only purpose they have in requesting them.
You will get no discussion if you drive-by post without giving context.
ETA: I googled your case since you didn’t provide anything at all. What exactly is it that you think will come from this case again? And what does the Capital One case have to do with anything?
Further, beyond political ammunition, what is it that you think will come out of the Oversight Committee reviewing these records? Because after all, that is the only purpose they have in requesting them.
This post was edited on 6/26/19 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:49 pm to Indefatigable
tandrews is an alter, just ask yourself, how many posters are as ignorantly dumb as Ebbanflow ??
Not many, so here's to you Ebbanflow/tandrews !!
You get the trophy for most ignorant pussy on the rant !!
717 posts since 6-19-19 Working overtime, to prove how fricking retarded he is , gets as many down votes in the recruiting section as he does here !!
Not many, so here's to you Ebbanflow/tandrews !!
You get the trophy for most ignorant pussy on the rant !!
717 posts since 6-19-19 Working overtime, to prove how fricking retarded he is , gets as many down votes in the recruiting section as he does here !!
This post was edited on 6/26/19 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:53 pm to tandrews37
Hey tarzana
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:56 pm to tandrews37
quote:
and deflated his wealth when he wanted to skirt around paying taxes.
Please explain this and be very specific.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:56 pm to Tony Tiger89
Wait it’s the “no caravans to the border” retard
I would change to something else too
I would change to something else too
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:58 pm to Bunyan
As equally as dumb as Tarzana, but it's not Tarzana !!
tandrews stinks up the recruiting section daily, never saw Tarzana in the recruiting section !!
tandrews stinks up the recruiting section daily, never saw Tarzana in the recruiting section !!
Posted on 6/26/19 at 1:08 pm to Janky
quote:
Please explain this and be very specific.
There was a 41 page opinion written by the judge. Why don't you give that a whirl hotshot.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 1:11 pm to tandrews37
I know the case but does it not bother you that the Chairman of the House Ways and Means can subpoena and obtain any citizen's taxes for shits and grins? The law screams political weaponization of private information ...but I suppose it"s OK if it can embarrass The Orange One. Fourth Amendment protections be damned!!!!
Posted on 6/26/19 at 1:11 pm to tandrews37
So, you got nothing as expected.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 1:11 pm to tandrews37
Do you work for a gov agency?
Posted on 6/26/19 at 1:12 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Want to explain what the hell you are talking about?
You will get no discussion if you drive-by post without giving context.
Trump vs. Mazars. The President sued his accounting firm.
quote:
And what does the Capital One case have to do with anything?
Both cases were lost by Trump. The judge in the Capitol One / Deuschthe Bank case cited the Mazars' judges ruling. They both deal with Trump trying to prevent the congressional committees from obtaining financial records for trump.
Oral argument in this case will be in like 2 months or less.
I'd imagine the Capitol One/ Deutsche Bank case will be fast tracked as well. Trump will likely lose both on appeal. He will appeal to SCOTUS. SCOTUS will deny his writs in both cases and affirm the lower courts' ruling against Trump.
The entities will all be forced to comply with the subpoenas and trump will have shot his shot as far as stopping it from happening.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 1:13 pm to tandrews37
You are delusional.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News