- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Can Barr arrest Nadler...
Posted on 5/6/19 at 11:31 pm to djmicrobe
Posted on 5/6/19 at 11:31 pm to djmicrobe
quote:It’s interesting though that when the DOJ was resisting Nunes’ fight for the release of information regarding an on-going investigation, many were calling for those in the DOJ to be arrested, despite the DOJ also raising valid legal and practical concerns.
for trying to coerce Barr to commit a crime by unredacting Grand Jury testimony?
Frankly, I think both are examples of hack politicians just being the partisan hacks that so many love when they are hacking it up on their side.
4
Posted on 5/6/19 at 11:38 pm to buckeye_vol
No, they are scum trying to keep thereselves out of jail and keep the money flowing in. SCUM of the earth.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:23 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
It’s interesting though that when the DOJ was resisting Nunes’ fight for the release of information regarding an on-going investigation, many were calling for those in the DOJ to be arrested, despite the DOJ also raising valid legal and practical concerns.
Nunes was asking for info unrelated to a Grand Jury investigation. DOJ could have permitted the underrated info to be viewed in a secure place, just like Barr.
Nadler is asking Barr to commit a crime. Nunez requested info which could be legally permitted to view.
Also, the DOJ was redacting info to cover up their own actions which looked questionable. They were covering up the truth.
Barr is covering up nothing.
These 2 situations are very different, if you have educated yourself to the facts.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:38 am to buckeye_vol
quote:Perhaps you can cite that?
It’s interesting though that when the DOJ was resisting Nunes’ fight for the release of information regarding an on-going investigation, many were calling for those in the DOJ to be arrested
I remember similar conversations re: Issa and Holder. Of course Holder subsequently became the first U.S. Attorney General in history to be held in both criminal and civil contempt. He was held, by a bipartisan 255–67 vote, in contempt by the House of Representatives. At that point, he probably should have been arrested.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 5:28 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
I "think" both are examples of hack politicians just being the partisan hacks that so many love when they are hacking it up on their side.
SO - an oversight committee seeking information a about how a disastrous, possibly illegal, policy = Fast & Furious = that resulted in the death of a US Law enforcement can be stonewalled and ignore subpoenas. = no problem
BUT - a totally stupid request - devoid of ANY valid purpose except political advantage - demanded that the AG break the law by revealing Grand Jury information to the DEMOCRAT operatives, MUST be honored or be arrested, ALL THE WHILE the information being DEMANDED is available in full in a SECURE location (where a leak can be traced) - and NOT ONE Democrat has bothered to look at it, meanwhile the minimally redacted version is available to the PUBLIC.
This is not an equivalent in the least.
This post was edited on 5/7/19 at 5:30 am
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News