- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
So is Mueller going to testify or not? He's been a ghost as far as public appearances go.
Posted on 4/18/19 at 4:04 pm
Posted on 4/18/19 at 4:04 pm
So much of a ghost that his spokesman was hired to say no comment to damn near every single press inquiry, call, or email.
The only time he's spoken has been pretty much through court filings and secondhand statements from his spokesman and the AG and DAG.
Why do democrats expect that he's just magically going to break his two year Oz like silence and appearance just because Jerry Nadler said so?
The only time he's spoken has been pretty much through court filings and secondhand statements from his spokesman and the AG and DAG.
Why do democrats expect that he's just magically going to break his two year Oz like silence and appearance just because Jerry Nadler said so?
Posted on 4/18/19 at 4:06 pm to Sentrius
That is the way it should be
Posted on 4/18/19 at 4:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Muh subpoenas!
Remember when Decatur was acting like it was a forgone conclusion that they were going to subpoena Trump for an interview or grand jury testimony?
He was acting like that while in reality Mueller and his team didn't even have the balls to actually inquire about getting a subpoena against POTUS in court.
Posted on 4/18/19 at 4:42 pm to Sentrius
The Dems are going to play it as an important stone left unturned, as if THAT will produce the smoking gun. All they've got is creating clouds of suspicion and confusion. Take that arrow from their quiver ASAP by getting Mueller in there and fast.
This post was edited on 4/18/19 at 4:43 pm
Posted on 4/18/19 at 5:33 pm to Sentrius
there is no way, NO WAY, the dimms do that.
if they do then the republican half of the committy gets to ask him questions too.
as soon as they ask a simple question,
"yes or no answer only, did donald trump break and laws or obstruct justice in any way?
as soon as mueller says no, they cant impeach or continue investigations for the next 15 months, and they very well know and understand this.
having mueller testify and put an end to any and all avenues of speculation is the last thing they want or would allow
if they do then the republican half of the committy gets to ask him questions too.
as soon as they ask a simple question,
"yes or no answer only, did donald trump break and laws or obstruct justice in any way?
as soon as mueller says no, they cant impeach or continue investigations for the next 15 months, and they very well know and understand this.
having mueller testify and put an end to any and all avenues of speculation is the last thing they want or would allow
This post was edited on 4/18/19 at 6:06 pm
Posted on 4/18/19 at 5:35 pm to Sentrius
I'd like to hear him explain when "exoneration" became the job of investigators/prosecutors.
That will be a good one.
That will be a good one.
Posted on 4/18/19 at 5:38 pm to gthog61
Yep. Exoneration. Word choice is important.
Posted on 4/18/19 at 5:49 pm to gthog61
Mueller has to avoid all of these topics under oath if he can...
Mueller would have to explain why they wanted to interview Trump well after they accepted no collusion occurred.
Why they avoided discussion in the collusion parts that painted the FBI (and Fusion gps) in a bad light.
Why they neglected to discuss the intelligence ties of many of those that were involved and how all of this swirls around the FISA court
Why they knew there was no collusion early on and yet continued the investigation for as long as they did
Why did he staff his special council with so many people that were directly tied to the Clinton and Trump investigations
Why did he selectively investigate and prosecute parts of the collusion narrative and not others (Podesta etc)
What was the official mandate and when was it determined
There are so many land mines in this that it would be a blood bath if he does appear
Mueller would have to explain why they wanted to interview Trump well after they accepted no collusion occurred.
Why they avoided discussion in the collusion parts that painted the FBI (and Fusion gps) in a bad light.
Why they neglected to discuss the intelligence ties of many of those that were involved and how all of this swirls around the FISA court
Why they knew there was no collusion early on and yet continued the investigation for as long as they did
Why did he staff his special council with so many people that were directly tied to the Clinton and Trump investigations
Why did he selectively investigate and prosecute parts of the collusion narrative and not others (Podesta etc)
What was the official mandate and when was it determined
There are so many land mines in this that it would be a blood bath if he does appear
Posted on 4/18/19 at 5:50 pm to laxtonto
I’m not sure but he will definitely mull it over!
Posted on 4/18/19 at 6:15 pm to Sentrius
They better off getting someone like Weismann to testify.
He's a slimy Trump hater and will likely agree with all their bullshite.
Yeah Mueller was the boss but what can he do? Disagree with his own report.
It's ludicrous. How many times do the Democrats want to hear "no obstruction, no collusion"?
Seems like a lot.
He's a slimy Trump hater and will likely agree with all their bullshite.
Yeah Mueller was the boss but what can he do? Disagree with his own report.
It's ludicrous. How many times do the Democrats want to hear "no obstruction, no collusion"?
Seems like a lot.
This post was edited on 4/18/19 at 6:17 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News