- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Mueller's line about the President not being exonerated is a bullcrap cheap shot
Posted on 3/24/19 at 10:55 pm
Posted on 3/24/19 at 10:55 pm
It's like your typical run of the mill prosecutor being salty and bitter after a jury/judge declines to accept criminal charges for a defendant or the defendant is a acquitted by a jury.
The prosecutor saying just because the defendant wasn't found guilty doesn't mean he was exonerated.
That's how much contempt some prosecutors like Mueller have for the notion of being presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
The prosecutor saying just because the defendant wasn't found guilty doesn't mean he was exonerated.
That's how much contempt some prosecutors like Mueller have for the notion of being presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 10:57 pm to Sentrius
What is implied is that he isn’t exonerated when it comes to obstruction of justice. But since the charge of Russian collusion has been indisputably dismissed, how could Trump have obstructed justice based on a false allegation and lie? That’s just defending yourself.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 11:02 pm to Sentrius
Like I do when I think most people on this board are being psycho I will treat the other side the same way. I sure did think there was collusion. I was wrong. On the count of obstruction of justice, id like to see that play out through the proper channels.
R/politics is quite frankly psychotic right now. A lot of talk about how if mueller found no evidence of Russia interference they would accept the results and it’s just the opposite. I’m not sure I understand the line of logic behind thinking an AG is going to lie and the people who prepared the report aren’t going to say anything about it. The results are in, I’m glad there was an investigation, but it’s innocent until proven guilty even if your personal opinion is that the accused is guilty. There are people on the left who are refusing to accept that and actually seem sorta angry that there was no collusion. I don’t get it.
R/politics is quite frankly psychotic right now. A lot of talk about how if mueller found no evidence of Russia interference they would accept the results and it’s just the opposite. I’m not sure I understand the line of logic behind thinking an AG is going to lie and the people who prepared the report aren’t going to say anything about it. The results are in, I’m glad there was an investigation, but it’s innocent until proven guilty even if your personal opinion is that the accused is guilty. There are people on the left who are refusing to accept that and actually seem sorta angry that there was no collusion. I don’t get it.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 11:05 pm to Sentrius
Investigating whether someone did not obstruct a criminal investigation of a crime that didnt happen, is like asking a prosecutor to prove you didn't NOT do something
How can anyone be exonerated from not doing something? fricking semantics and a parting jab by Mueller, whose entire job was to cover up his own legacy IC
How can anyone be exonerated from not doing something? fricking semantics and a parting jab by Mueller, whose entire job was to cover up his own legacy IC
Posted on 3/24/19 at 11:25 pm to Sentrius
No one is ever declared "Innocent".
They are declared "Not Guilty".
They are declared "Not Guilty".
Posted on 3/25/19 at 12:24 am to DyeHardDylan
quote:
But since the charge of Russian collusion has been indisputably dismissed, how could Trump have obstructed justice based on a false allegation and lie? That’s just defending yourself
This is what I'm screaming at the TV every time a leftist is on
Posted on 3/25/19 at 12:28 am to DyeHardDylan
quote:
ow could Trump have obstructed justice based on a false allegation and lie? That’s just defending yourself.
Exactly. If you're coming after me with completely fabricated bullshite then I'm probably obstructing the frick out of you
Posted on 3/25/19 at 12:30 am to SirWinston
Stop screaming. CNN is for IQ's of 80 and below.
For those people it is truth, reality, and it makes sense.
To the above average intelligence that can cognitively analyze in real time how obscene and dumb the point being made truly is, you wonder who the frick buys this low grade beef?
And we know who does.
For those people it is truth, reality, and it makes sense.
To the above average intelligence that can cognitively analyze in real time how obscene and dumb the point being made truly is, you wonder who the frick buys this low grade beef?
And we know who does.
Posted on 3/25/19 at 1:53 am to Odysseus32
quote:
On the count of obstruction of justice, id like to see that play out through the proper channels.
It did. The only obstruction was Vile Bob covering for a rotten DOJ.
Posted on 3/25/19 at 6:48 am to Sentrius
quote:
The prosecutor saying just because the defendant wasn't found guilty doesn't mean he was exonerated.
Due process disagrees.
Posted on 3/25/19 at 6:55 am to Sentrius
It's time to start investigating Mueller!
Posted on 3/25/19 at 7:06 am to Sentrius
quote:
That's how much contempt some prosecutors like Mueller have for the notion of being presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
Yes /\
This statement alone takes away any 'integrity' of Mueller in his handling of this case.
He SHOULD have said - "I sent my best rabid pitbulls out there to persecute this S.O.B. and found exactly NOTHING!! This whole mess was a HOAX. I should have shut it down in three weeks! Now I recommend another Special Counsel to root out all the instigatiors of this SEDITIOUS act."
This post was edited on 3/25/19 at 7:08 am
Posted on 3/25/19 at 7:11 am to Smeg
quote:
No one is ever declared "Innocent".
They are declared "Not Guilty".
Yes - and that is after a PUBLIC TRIAL
When the DA refuses to even indict a person of murder, there is a good chance that the man is, in fact, not a murderer.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News