- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why is Fox hiring Brazil and not Lara Logan?
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:37 am
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:37 am
Remember the hot chick from 60 Minutes? Seems she would be a better choice: Logan
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:38 am to rebelrouser
Fox News is Controlled Opposition.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:39 am to rebelrouser
The Murdoch Boys are Globalist Cucks.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:43 am to rebelrouser
They needed someone to rig the debates.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:43 am to rebelrouser
On a more sophomoric level: Logan's got the Hogans.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:55 am to rebelrouser
One is much easier on the eyes than the other. That should always be a deciding factor to a viewing audience. Appears FOX didn't get that memo.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 9:00 am to Stingray
quote:
Fox News is Controlled Opposition.
How open minded folks can't see this is beyond me.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 9:01 am to Stingray
quote:
Fox News is Controlled Opposition.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 9:02 am to rebelrouser
quote:
Why is Fox hiring Brazil and not Lara Logan?
Fox is dead. The old guy was a global elitist, but he was also an astute entrepreneur who was content to go along with the business model of having a conservative-leaning network that was raking in the revenue like crazy.
5he sons are already rich, and they want to fit in with the Manhattan cocktail party crowd. So do their wives. That's why lyin' fool Donna Brazile gets hired, while the consummate professional journalist Lara Logan does not.
Shep Smith has a bright future at Fox. Hannity, Tucker and a few others should understand by now that they won't have a long-term future there.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 9:04 am to KCT
quote:
Shep Smith has a bright future at Fox.
Unless the #hetoo story has legs and gets (any) traction.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 9:16 am to IslandBuckeye
quote:
Shep Smith has a bright future at Fox.
Unless the #hetoo story has legs and gets (any) traction.
I think Chris Wallace would go into mourning and start wearing a black veil if he ever lost his little buddy.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 9:28 am to rebelrouser
Logan gave an interview a couple of months ago where she said she was going to write a series of books and do selective freelance reporting.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 9:34 am to KCT
quote:
KCT
Between yesterday and this Morning. Cuck Wallace is trying to find a way for the report to find Trump guilty of something. He And Juan are Not Happy. And people think FOX is conservative. Right
Posted on 3/24/19 at 9:38 am to rebelrouser
Lara Logan would be as good as Tucker. It's amazing to me that Fox would not like that increase in ratings and revenue.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 1:55 pm to cajuncarguy
I've seen more of Logan on Fox since the Brazile hiring than I've seen of Brazile.
Some of the pro-conservative people here are as narrow minded as the DU idiots. A fair and balanced news network can not be a pure pom-pom waving, cartwheel turning group of cheerleaders for either party. Fair and balanced means when the Democrats do something stupid you point it out and cover the story. When Republicans do something stupid (and if Republicans never did anything stupid this country would be in a lot better shape today than it is) you point it out and cover the story. If Democrats do something good (Yeah, I know, but humor me and use your imagination) you point it out and cover the story. If Republicans do something good you point it out and cover the story. I don't want news networks to be propaganda factories for either party. I want them to be news networks. Turning media outlets into Pravdas for either political party is bad if you are interested in actually being informed as to what is going on in either party. I swear the way some people have reacted to Fox in the last couple of days you would have thought they had replaced Hannity with Don Lemon.
Some of the pro-conservative people here are as narrow minded as the DU idiots. A fair and balanced news network can not be a pure pom-pom waving, cartwheel turning group of cheerleaders for either party. Fair and balanced means when the Democrats do something stupid you point it out and cover the story. When Republicans do something stupid (and if Republicans never did anything stupid this country would be in a lot better shape today than it is) you point it out and cover the story. If Democrats do something good (Yeah, I know, but humor me and use your imagination) you point it out and cover the story. If Republicans do something good you point it out and cover the story. I don't want news networks to be propaganda factories for either party. I want them to be news networks. Turning media outlets into Pravdas for either political party is bad if you are interested in actually being informed as to what is going on in either party. I swear the way some people have reacted to Fox in the last couple of days you would have thought they had replaced Hannity with Don Lemon.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 2:26 pm to KingOrange
That was a Fat Thumb downvote on iPhone. I went back and upvoted to balance out. But, you are dead right
Posted on 3/24/19 at 2:27 pm to Stingray
quote:
Fox News is Controlled Opposition.
Bingo.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News