Started By
Message

re: Skeptic or Not, Can we agree on the meeting?

Posted on 3/19/19 at 11:03 pm to
Posted by ellessuuuu
Member since Sep 2004
8537 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 11:03 pm to
He's not a confessed felon, he actual took the case to trial. Bill Self "discussed" shady activity with him as well, as did Sean Miller.

You seem to have bought exactly what the Advocate and Dellenger were fed by LSU over the weekend. Peel back the layers, LSU has no reason fire WW with cause, no Pat Forde's blog is not "cause". Unless LSU wants to pay him $9MM not to coach, they'll have no to choice but to eventually reinstate him.

Unfortunately, our inept administration will end up doing after we get bounced in the first weekend of the tournament.
This post was edited on 3/19/19 at 11:04 pm
Posted by Irish LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2014
2456 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 11:22 pm to
quote:

He's not a confessed felon

Dawkins has accepted a plea deal.....that makes him a convicted felon.
quote:

Bill Self "discussed" shady activity with him as well, as did Sean Miller.

So.
quote:

LSU has no reason fire WW with cause

Well.......IF (and it's a big IF) LSU wanted to terminate WW for not attending the meeting, I think they would be on good legal ground. However, I think LSU will wait until the NCAA announces their findings and that will be what LSU uses to get rid of WW. If LSU did not really believe WW is guilty of MAJOR NCAA VIOLATIONS, they would not have suspended him.
quote:

Unless LSU wants to pay him $9MM not to coach, they'll have no to choice but to eventually reinstate him.

They already have cause......they are just waiting for additional/official findings from the NCAA so it will be a slam dunk.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram