- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Simple Question
Posted on 3/14/19 at 8:56 pm to JPLSU1981
Posted on 3/14/19 at 8:56 pm to JPLSU1981
Lsu1981?? Really???
Lsu didn’t have “ no comment” regarding itself ... stated two issues has been addressed by them and the NCAA .. withholding further comment bcus it’s not completely their issue ..
Wade did not say this
Lsu didn’t have “ no comment” regarding itself ... stated two issues has been addressed by them and the NCAA .. withholding further comment bcus it’s not completely their issue ..
Wade did not say this
Posted on 3/14/19 at 8:56 pm to LSUJML
quote:
Was an NCAA investigator present for Millers meeting?
Thank you. I love how people leave out details to fit talking points into their agenda.
Posted on 3/14/19 at 8:57 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:if you have nothing to hide, you speak.
What if you were called to a meeting by your superiors to discuss you paycheck and when you showed up the IRS was there? That’s a better analogy
If you’re dirty, you bail.
Posted on 3/14/19 at 8:58 pm to LSUJML
LSUJML!!!
Post if the day ... walk into the meeting with representation and only answer what you feel you can and are comfortable
Post if the day ... walk into the meeting with representation and only answer what you feel you can and are comfortable
Posted on 3/14/19 at 8:59 pm to Cromulent
quote:
If the FBI stated to not speak on the matter as it’s an ongoing investigation then I would relay that to my superiors and end up not going.
If all that is true.... and if you are lucky, you would only be suspended and not fired.
Posted on 3/14/19 at 9:03 pm to bigcatfish
You are pretty simple. Are you not?
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 3/14/19 at 9:03 pm to bigcatfish
You are pretty simple. Are you not?
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 3/14/19 at 9:04 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
Terrible analogy dumbass What if you were called to a meeting by your superiors to discuss you paycheck and when you showed up the IRS was there? That’s a better analogy
But obvious question ... what’s wrong with your standing that you'll Slight the investigative body??
Most should realize ... helping investigations help you .... derailing investigations of time and money only set them out after you more than their initial pursuits
Posted on 3/14/19 at 9:07 pm to atltiger6487
quote:
if you have nothing to hide, you speak. If you’re dirty, you bail.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
You would just answer questions from the IRS because your employer wanted you to?
I’d be happy to speak to my employer but I don’t want to talk to the IRS unless they need to talk to me
Wade could easily screw himself on something else just by the NCAA being there. It’s a bad idea if it’s not necessary
Posted on 3/14/19 at 9:08 pm to ABSK_007
quote:
But obvious question ... what’s wrong with your standing that you'll Slight the investigative body??
Nothing.
I just know that organizations like the NCAA and IRS are just looking to frick people. That’s their job.
Maybe I made an honest mistake on my taxes. Why would I want to incriminate myself infront of them if they didn’t want to talk to me in the first place?
I think you are all talk
This post was edited on 3/14/19 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 3/14/19 at 9:09 pm to Cromulent
quote:
If the FBI stated to not speak on the matter as it’s an ongoing investigation
Link?
It would be very surprising for the FBI to ask this of someone who is not their witness but instead someone the defense may call (he has not even been subpoenaed yet).
Considering Wade has said he has done no business with Dawkins and that nothing on the tapes we've seen is relevant to either trial (that's why the first tape was excluded in the first trial), I doubt he'll be called as a witness. The tapes were released by the defense attorney becauseit won't be allowed. He's attempting to taint the coaches and rehabilitate his slimy client.
Speaking of the slimeball Dawkins, no doubt the FBI has many tapes of him with many other coaches (I believe they have tapes of 3 Dawkins/Wade conversations) no doubt they'll be leaking a lot more tapes as the trial grows near.
This post was edited on 3/14/19 at 9:13 pm
Posted on 3/14/19 at 9:10 pm to bigcatfish
Either you're a troll or you're a mark. I don't know what's worse.
Posted on 3/14/19 at 9:12 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
If the FBI stated to not speak on the matter as it’s an ongoing investigation then I would relay that to my superiors and end up not going.
Perhaps and yet Smart and his family have spoken to NCAA. We will see if it helps or hurts Smart.
Posted on 3/14/19 at 9:15 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
Honest tax mistake
Young?
Wade would have his legal team in an advisory compacity..
Lawyers can protect you from mistakes ... a little bit of their privileged purpose ...
No one is “just talking”
Easy stuff compadre
This post was edited on 3/14/19 at 9:15 pm
Posted on 3/14/19 at 9:18 pm to ABSK_007
And if your lawyer advised you not to go to the meeting, you are saying you would go?
Posted on 3/14/19 at 9:19 pm to bigcatfish
Well dummy we are not contracted employees we mostly all live in a right to work state Unless we have a contract so go frick off
Posted on 3/14/19 at 9:24 pm to makinskrilla
And yet he isn’t fired. Hum. Wonder why?
Posted on 3/14/19 at 9:26 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
And if your lawyer advised you not to go to the meeting, you are saying you would go?
My lawyers would advise me not to For a simple tax MISTAKE?
Aaah, but Wade ...
Now you see, now you see ..
If your lawyers advise you to stay away.... maybe it ain’t so simple compadre .....maybe you need more than legal advice, but avoid self-criminalization
This post was edited on 3/14/19 at 9:28 pm
Posted on 3/14/19 at 9:32 pm to Cromulent
quote:
If the FBI stated to not speak on the matter as it’s an ongoing investigation then I would relay that to my superiors and end up not going.
The FBI has not made any such request. WW is trying to "take the fifth" with his employer. You can do that in court, but not with your employer. WW's lawyer is the one advising WW not to talk with his bosses (not the FBI).
BTW....WW did speak to his bosses concerning the earlier portion of the wiretapped conversation (the part he felt comfortable denying). Why the change? Same case. Same FBI. Same bosses. When your boss (JA) calls you to a meeting, your boss can invite ANYONE he pleases to attend...especially since it is written into WW's contract that he MUST cooperate with any investigation by the SEC or NCAA.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)