Started By
Message

Veterans: How much use does a military pistol actually get in deployment?

Posted on 12/15/18 at 8:45 am
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30461 posts
Posted on 12/15/18 at 8:45 am
How much have we heard about the pistol contracts recently?
Non-Military here, so wanting vets opinion on this.

I can see how important they could be during peace time or military police action.

But what about you Afghan/Iraq vets that were carrying your rifle all day?

Did you carry your pistol?
Did you ever have to draw it?
Did you have to fire it?
Why?
Did you have to draw it because your primary weapon failed?
Did you have to draw it because your assailant was too close for rifle?
Could you give a percentage of how many combatants were actually shot with a pistol?



Seems to me, that the lightweight m4 eliminates the need for a side arm and you could carry more mags instead of toting a 2 lb pistol and it other 2-3 mags.
This post was edited on 12/15/18 at 8:52 am
Posted by MC5601
Tyler, Texas
Member since Jan 2010
3898 posts
Posted on 12/15/18 at 9:04 am to
While I agree with the majority of your post, the main purpose of a sidearm is as a backup when your main weapon fails. While a pistol is by no means a substitute for a battle rifle, it’s purpose is to allow you to fight your way to another rifle. Also, the size and easy manipulation of a pistol can be a life saver during hand to hand combat.
Posted by YawBaw7
Your Mom's house
Member since Jan 2017
414 posts
Posted on 12/15/18 at 9:26 am to
The pistol is an impractical combat weapon. There is arguably no use for it on the battlefield. If you are carrying an m16 or m4, you absolutely don’t need a pistol. Only effective at short ranges and highly inaccurate. Plus there is zero need to conceal weapons in the military.

Marine infantry here with 2 combat tours in Iraq ‘04 and ‘05. Sgt when I got out and I’ve never even touched a pistol.
Posted by mooseofterror
USA
Member since Dec 2012
1339 posts
Posted on 12/15/18 at 9:43 am to
8 year Army Vet - Commissioned officers and Warrant Officers normally carried sidearms. Most shooting they see is typically at the range. I can honestly say that I never had a pistol malfunction , FF etc while qualifying at the range ;) All other answers are classified...
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16632 posts
Posted on 12/15/18 at 9:51 am to
There's a historical, traditional aspect to issuing officers and NCO's a personal weapon. Way back when it was a sword. In terms of modern combat for frontline troops it's not practical or useful unless you are SOF, the Marine Corps is phasing out handguns for M4's for all enlisted ranks and officers below O-5. I still think handgun training is important and should be taught as a part of marksmanship training regardless of whether or not one would be issued. US Army, 20+ years here.
Posted by Skeezer
Member since Apr 2017
2296 posts
Posted on 12/15/18 at 11:18 am to
I spent 14 months in Iraq, and saw combat on a fairly regular basis. The only time I ever fired a sidearm was at the range.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 12/15/18 at 11:25 am to
Never.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30118 posts
Posted on 12/15/18 at 1:13 pm to
its like a knife, its there as a last ditch backup weapon, nothing more
Posted by Capital Cajun
Over Yonder
Member since Aug 2007
5527 posts
Posted on 12/15/18 at 6:39 pm to
My brother in law spent 25 years in the infantry and was deployed several times.

Never carried a pistol, just his m16 or m4. His reason is that ounces lead to pounds and they already have enough shite to carry.
Posted by 10MTNTiger
Banks of the Guadalupe
Member since Sep 2012
4139 posts
Posted on 12/15/18 at 7:26 pm to
Afghanistan and Iraq here.

As an initial matter, yes, a long gun is always, always preferred.

That said, there were multiple situations every day when I was glad to have a sidearm. For example, you don’t spend all day kitted up and the vast majority of folks work in a toc or motorpool where they don’t carry rifles all day.

Secondly, I cannot count the number of meetings that I would attend with local nationals which were semi-formal, damn glad to have a handgun for those situations as otherwise you’re left with a pocket knife or trying to beat someone to death with a chai pot until someone with a gun gets there. With the number of green on blue, especially in the last few years, I am far more worried about getting popped inside the wire than I am outside - same exact rationale why we all conceal carry here.

Lastly, it is far easier to manipulate a handgun in a vehicle with body armor, radios and the rest of the shite on. You could also run a radio with one hand and fire with one hand if need be, of course this is a bad scenario if you’re doing that, but it’s an option.
Posted by namvet6566
Member since Oct 2012
6766 posts
Posted on 12/15/18 at 9:08 pm to
Never
Posted by Billyraychubbs
Member since Mar 2018
1151 posts
Posted on 12/15/18 at 11:18 pm to
Infantry marine machine gunner. Carried one on a couple of patrols as a backup to my 240. Running around in a firefight I realized it was a pain in the arse flipping on my hip and putting it on my chest fricked up my prone. Ended up leaving it inside my pack the entire deployment. Never was issued one on my next 2 deployments.

If you or someone else is using a pistol shite has hit the fan. Just like fixing bayonets.
Posted by WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot
poolside at Cocal (UA since 2010)
Member since Dec 2009
2055 posts
Posted on 12/16/18 at 2:44 am to
quote:

How much use does a military pistol actually get in deployment?

It's extremely rare that a pistol would be used in combat.
Normally, a pistol sees a couple of thousand rounds a year at the range (including both quals and drills.)
A pistol is better suited for defense, but in CQB, it's quicker to transition to your sidearm than it is to perform remedial action on your primary weapon.

ETA: If you have to draw your sidearm in a tactical situation, you and your team are probably having a very bad day!
This post was edited on 12/16/18 at 2:47 am
Posted by tigersownall
Thibodaux
Member since Sep 2011
15360 posts
Posted on 12/16/18 at 10:21 am to
Sgt York used it.
Posted by PSUMMERS
Ms
Member since Sep 2014
388 posts
Posted on 12/16/18 at 11:19 am to
Could you give a percentage of how many combatants were actually shot with a pistol?

2 tours and I knew of only one. A detainee slipped his zip cuffs charged a guy they went to the ground. SM got to his pistol and put one in his ear.
This post was edited on 12/16/18 at 11:21 am
Posted by FrenchJoe
H 861
Member since Aug 2006
1031 posts
Posted on 12/16/18 at 8:36 pm to
It all depends on your MOS. As a corpsman in the Nam I was issued a Colt 45 and when they asked me if I wanted a weapon I said Hell yeah, give me an M-16. There's this thing called fire superiority. That 45 is for special occasions. I fired the 16 at the bad guys a few times but never the pistol. Unfortunately one of my marines accidentally killed his bunker mate while cleaning his damn pistol. Our FO (forward observer) used his pistol for a kill, but then again, it was a special occasion and FOs are carrying a radio and binoculars. I used the M-16 as a disguise although the Unit One (medical bag) probably gave me away. I was I loved my Colt but felt like I was naked without the 16.
Posted by TennesseeFan25
Honolulu
Member since May 2016
8391 posts
Posted on 12/16/18 at 8:41 pm to
A deployment of mine was just watching third country nationals and local nationals that came on the base to do jobs fill sandbags, help build new long term shelters etc.

In those situations we carried M-16 and M-9. It was important for us though as we are in the middle of sleeping quarters. If we had to use our weapons M-9 having less velocity is better than M-16 considering what's on the other side of our targets
This post was edited on 12/16/18 at 8:43 pm
Posted by NoMoreKnees
Pulaski, TN
Member since Jan 2017
313 posts
Posted on 12/16/18 at 10:06 pm to
I have two stories shared by my father and a platoon member who shared with me at a reunion that my father hosted at his home after his retirement. Both were how his sidearm saved his life. In WWII he survived the Iwo Jima landing and he was guarding his buddy while sleeping in a naval shell hole with his .45 in his hand. One night a shell exploded and illuminated a Japanese soldier attempting to bayonet his buddy. My father shot the Japanese with his pistol and saved his buddy and himself. He was discharged by the Marines and went to school and got his commission in the Army prior to Korea. In Korea on July 31, 1950 his company was overrun by the North Koreans and he was wounded through the thigh with a Burp Gun. He was of one of six out of the entire rifle company to survive the attack. He was able to get down the hill with his .45 in stomach of a South Korean who spoke to the North Koreans on the way down the hill.
This post was edited on 12/16/18 at 10:28 pm
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65049 posts
Posted on 12/20/18 at 10:03 am to
Veteran pistol carrier checking in. The Colt .45 was my primary weapon in the Army. It was because my MOS required me to carry around a tripod and a surveying transit (scope looking thing). So I couldn't carry a rifle and all of that shite with me at the same time.

And the colt was a beautiful pistol and a massive pile of shite. It was so old that it couldn't shoot straight. I was scared to death that they wouldn't give me an M16 if the shite ever hit the fan. Because if it did hit the fan I was better off throwing my pistol at the enemy. Our pistols were old and worn out. They were so worn out that at the end of my tenure we moved to the Beretta which was a fine piece of weaponry.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:21 pm to
I was an 0331 with a rifle company during my first deployment and then a weapons company during my second and was stuck with an M9 on my thigh. Never drew it outside the wire and never fired it overseas.
I'd estimate very little combatants were shot with a pistol.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram