- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Study: All Humanity Comes From One Couple.................... You don't say
Posted on 11/28/18 at 5:44 pm to blackrose890
Posted on 11/28/18 at 5:44 pm to blackrose890
Human population growth. Any of them. Just google.
1
Posted on 11/28/18 at 5:52 pm to rickyh
you mean graphs like this that have greater than 8 people at year 2500 BCE?
Posted on 11/28/18 at 5:54 pm to blackrose890
Or this one?
Posted on 11/28/18 at 5:54 pm to blackrose890
Or maybe this one?
Posted on 11/28/18 at 6:07 pm to blackrose890
Do you know how long 2.5 million years is and ridiculous it is to believe human population stayed stagnant that long. There are many out there better than these. But they purposely leave the line above when they know before that this is incorrect. It impossible for this to be true.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 6:08 pm to blackrose890
The first graph is the most honest.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 6:10 pm to rickyh
quote:
Do you know how long 2.5 million years is and ridiculous it is to believe human population stayed stagnant that long. There are many out there better than these. But they purposely leave the line above when they know before that this is incorrect. It impossible for this to be true.
It's not ridiculous at all, you're applying modern standards to people hunting mammoths with sticks tipped with sharp rocks.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 6:11 pm to rickyh
quote:
The first graph is the most honest.
The first graph still shows millions. Populations greater than a million for the majority of history.
This post was edited on 11/28/18 at 6:11 pm
Posted on 11/28/18 at 6:22 pm to Boatshoes
quote:
... Uh, the length of a planetary day is determined by the speed at which that planet rotates.
Yes, but we're talking about the beginning of mankind. At that point it wasn't even known that the earth wasn't the center of the universe and was in fact not flat.
Without the sun to help orientate the Earth's position, early man wouldn't have been able to track rotations/days.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 6:24 pm to rickyh
quote:
Human population growth. Any of them. Just google.
quote:
Do you know how long 2.5 million years is and ridiculous it is to believe human population stayed stagnant that long.
He tells you to pick any of them then gets angry because you didn't pick the right ones*.
*The ones Kent Hovind created.
This post was edited on 11/28/18 at 6:25 pm
Posted on 11/28/18 at 6:52 pm to Azkiger
It comes from not understanding the modeling. If you have a predetermined year total with a predetermined population on both ends of the graph. All you have to do is pick a formula that resembles the curve and adjust the last remaining variable.
It's no different than when Muslims say something like: the Quran predicted atoms and subatomic particles. No you retroactively applied a new definition onto already pre determined outcomes and came up with a new reading of an already previously accepted term.
It's no different than when Muslims say something like: the Quran predicted atoms and subatomic particles. No you retroactively applied a new definition onto already pre determined outcomes and came up with a new reading of an already previously accepted term.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 7:52 pm to rickyh
quote:
Do you know how long 2.5 million years is and ridiculous it is to believe human population stayed stagnant that long.
It is almost as if they were not as well adapted and needed to evolve to become better at pro-creating...
Also there is evidence that humans almost died out about 1000 years ago, and they believe it to be a supervolcano that put earth into an ice age. Then the population was super stagnant because of population bottlenecking because only strong genes survived.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:20 pm to rickyh
quote:
You may have started from a single cell. Not me.
Wanna bet?
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:28 pm to rickyh
quote:
You may have started from a single cell. Not me. Trying to explain time to someone who doesn't understand that from God's perspective, time is meaningless. Before He created our Sun, Moon and Earth. What constituted a day? Or our or minute. Man created the calendar and clock. He studied the amount of time it took for the Earth to circle the Sun. The Earth to make one complete revolution and the moon to orbit the Earth. How long did it take God to create these? Only God Knows. But what is his measurement of time? Or does he measure it at all? Not one of the graphs that I asked you to post has been posted. Does that mean, that none of you took the time to look? You just want to argue and insult. You people are a waste of time. That is what time is. Trying to explain something to someone who knows to much already. Okay Sheeple. I will not post on this subject again unless someone posts one of the graphs that I asked you to post.
like this one?
Posted on 11/29/18 at 12:25 am to blackrose890
quote:
I can dismantle this whole post with one truth.
No, you can't.
quote:
There's no evidence for the biblical flood and no you can't prove the bible with the bible.
Two geologists at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory say evidence point to the Black Sea.
There are many many theories.
However, as usual, you don't want honest conversation on it.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 12:34 am to Azkiger
He tells you to pick any of them then gets angry because you didn't pick the right ones*.
I didn't get angry. Why would you say that? I was just pointing out how crazy that is.2 and a half million years and the population stayed the same. That is laughable. please tell me that none of you are that , what's the word to be nice? The scientist have found ruins that pre date 6000 years ago. And there was civilization before the flood. They totally ignore the restart. It is easier to believe in our Creator than to believe in this nonsense. Think about it. People are just going to stay in one place and not populate. That's insane.
I didn't get angry. Why would you say that? I was just pointing out how crazy that is.2 and a half million years and the population stayed the same. That is laughable. please tell me that none of you are that , what's the word to be nice? The scientist have found ruins that pre date 6000 years ago. And there was civilization before the flood. They totally ignore the restart. It is easier to believe in our Creator than to believe in this nonsense. Think about it. People are just going to stay in one place and not populate. That's insane.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 12:46 am to rickyh
From Fast moving water to Conglomerate to Redwall and other beds to Decay rate of fish fossils to Massive plant and animal graveyards to Widely diverse fossil mixtures....
There is a ton of evidence for a flood.
We find fossils of sea creatures in rock layers that cover all the continents. For example, most of the rock layers in the walls of Grand Canyon (more than a mile above sea level) contain marine fossils. Fossilized shellfish are even found in the Himalayas.
Ton of evidence
There is a ton of evidence for a flood.
We find fossils of sea creatures in rock layers that cover all the continents. For example, most of the rock layers in the walls of Grand Canyon (more than a mile above sea level) contain marine fossils. Fossilized shellfish are even found in the Himalayas.
Ton of evidence
Posted on 11/29/18 at 12:55 am to Jjdoc
quote:
Two geologists at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory say evidence point to the Black Sea.
There are many many theories.
One, that would not be a global flood. Two, the rise of the Black sea was a steady rise from rising sea levels. So it doesn't fit the biblical narrative at all. Of course you've already misrepresented my position and substituted it with nonsense so I guess I can't expect you to actually research the topic.
quote:
Ton of Evidence
Zero Evidence of a global flood as according to the text of the bible.
This post was edited on 11/29/18 at 12:56 am
Posted on 11/29/18 at 1:02 am to Jjdoc
quote:
We find fossils of sea creatures in rock layers that cover all the continents. For example, most of the rock layers in the walls of Grand Canyon (more than a mile above sea level) contain marine fossils. Fossilized shellfish are even found in the Himalayas.
You realize the Himalayas were once at below the sea because the plates hadn't yet pushed them up right? The majority of the USA was at one point under water in prehistory due to global ice depletion.
You're making the assumption that waters have never risen except for the flood.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 1:30 am to blackrose890
Thank you for posting the graphs. I just can't understand why people can't see the obvious. In 4000 years our population has exploded at a steady and constant rate. Wars and disease has taken a huge toll but even that didn't change the steady climb. And people can believe humanity lived here 2 and a half million years and did nothing. You or no one else can justify this logic. 4,000 compared to 2,500.000. Really. I don't have enough faith to believe that. How? Why? The math don't work. This world would have died well over 2.4 million years ago. 
Page 21 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News